View clinical trials related to Contact Allergy.
Filter by:This study will investigate what concentrations of the most common thiurams and carbamates that elicit allergic contact dermatitis under patch test and what concentrations of the rubber accelerators that elicit allergic contact dermatitis by repeated exposures under simulated use conditions. Further, it will investigate whether a damaged skin barrier as caused by wet work increase the severity of the allergic contact dermatitis. The participants will be assigned to either the SLS (sodium lauryl sulfate)-group or non SLS-group. For the participants of the SLS-group, one volar forearm will be randomized to be pre-irritated with a soap i.e. detergent: sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) for 24 hours to simulate wet work. The participants of the non SLS-group will not be pre-irritated with SLS. Following this, the participants' volar forearms will be exposed to thiurams or carbamates and a control solution every night for 7 nights to simulate the repeated exposure to rubber gloves with accelerators. The skin reactions will be read cf. current international guidelines and further quantified using laser Doppler flowmetry. During the study, all participants will be patch tested on the upper back with rubber accelerators to investigate their current degree of sensitization and the dose-response relationships.
Rationale: Foot ulcers among diabetics are common. The presence of a contact allergy limits the healing process. Contact allergies for wound dressings are common among patients with ulcers caused by venous insufficiency but less is known about contact allergies in diabetic patients with ulcers. Objective: To determine the prevalence of contact allergies for wound dressings in patients with diabetic foot ulcers. Study design: A prospective multicenter study. Study population: Patients (n=139) with diabetic foot ulcers caused by type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus treated at Rijnstate Hospital Arnhem, the Netherlands. Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary study parameter is the presence of contact allergies for wound dressings. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: An allergy test is standard procedure at Rijnstate Hospital, there is no direct technique-related burden or risk for the patient. In addition, wound dressings can be adjusted in patients where a contact allergy is determined which will benefit the prognosis of these patients. The data of this study will give insight in the prevalence of contact allergies for wound dressings in patients with diabetic foot ulcers.