Congenital Ptosis Clinical Trial
Official title:
Standard Levator Aponeurosis / Muscle Resection With Three Point Fixation Versus Two Point Fixation Tucking for Congenital Ptosis With Fair to Good Levator Function
Verified date | July 2017 |
Source | Cairo University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
to evaluate the surgical effect of levator aponeurosis resection Versus two point fixation levator aponeurosis Tucking for Congenital Ptosis
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 40 |
Est. completion date | July 2017 |
Est. primary completion date | July 2017 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 2 Years to 12 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Unilateral or bilateral simple isolated congenital ptosis. 2. Levator function more than 4mm Exclusion Criteria: 1. Congenital ptosis associated with other ocular syndromes. 2. Recurrent ptosis following any attempt for repair. 3. Traumatic ptosis or acquired ptosis 4. -ve bell's phenomenon. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Egypt | HEBA | Cairo city | Zahraa Al Maadi |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Heba Hamdy Ibrahim Mohammed |
Egypt,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Comparison of surgical efficacy of standard levator aponeurosis resection and two point fixation tucking regarding MRD1 | MRD1:distance between upper lid margin and corneal light reflex measured in mm by transparent ruler | 6 to 9 months |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05895695 -
Levator Muscle Reaction for Unilateral Congenital Ptosis Repair as Compared to Levator Plication
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04537169 -
Clinical Significance of Whitnall Ligament Structure
|