Study of Interpersonal Therapy and Complicated Grief Treatment in Adults 50 Years and Older

Complicated Grief Clinical Trial

— CGTOA  

Official title:

Complicated Grief Treatment in Older Adults

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT01244295
• Other study ID #: 5645
• Secondary ID: R01MH070741
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• First received: November 18, 2010
• Last updated: January 15, 2014
• Start date: March 2008
• Est. completion date: December 2013

Study information

• Verified date: January 2014
• Source: New York State Psychiatric Institute
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: United States: Institutional Review Board
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

A comparison study of 16 week treatment with either specialized psychotherapy for complicated grief (CGT) or with standard interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) in older adults with complicated grief.

Description:

According to the National Council on Aging (1), in 2005, there were more than 10 million older Americans who were widowed (8.6 million women (43%) and 2.1 million men (14%) over the age of 65). These people are at risk for a debilitating reaction called Traumatic or Complicated Grief (CG: the term now used for this condition). Studies confirm that Complicated Grief can be reliably identified and occurs in about 10-20% of bereaved individuals. CG appears to carry much of the risk for negative outcomes of bereavement. CG can affect health status and influence decisions about personal health care. The risk of hypertension is 10 times greater among widowed subjects who meet consensus criteria for CG compared to those who do not, while subjects with CG are 17 times less likely to have visited a physician in the months since the death. Despite its high prevalence and significant morbidity, there are no proven efficacious treatments. The PI of this project developed a novel psychotherapy called Complicated Grief Treatment (CGT), and has now completed a study (MH60783) comprised of adults over age 18, that confirmed efficacy of this approach. Participants ≥ age 60 (n=29) were less likely to be employed and more likely to live alone. We observed better response to CGT than IPT, as in younger adults. However, confirmation of efficacy among seniors is important, since older people have different vulnerabilities and different problems in adjusting to grief than younger adults. We plan to conduct a randomized controlled study of CGT v IPT in individuals > 50 years of age who meet criteria for complicated grief and have no contraindications to study participation. Our specific aims are: 1) To compare results of 16 sessions of either CGT or standard IPT. We hypothesize that CGT will produce a higher response rate and shorter time to response than IPT, and that responders will show significantly greater reduction in associated symptoms and impairment than non-responders.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 151
• Est. completion date: December 2013
• Est. primary completion date: June 2013
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 50 Years to 95 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Complicated Grief is the most important problem

• Ability to give informed consent

• Fluent in English

• Willingness to have sessions audiotaped

• Willing to undergo random assignment

Exclusion Criteria:

• Diagnosis of one or more of the following disorders: Schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder, current (past 6 months) substance abuse or positive urine toxicology exam, Bipolar Disorder, current manic episode, Dementia

• Acute, unstable or severe medical illness such as (but not limited to) stroke, epilepsy, or other neurodegenerative disorders, metastatic or active cancer, hepatic disease, or primary renal disease requiring dialysis

• Pending or active disability claim or lawsuit related to the death

• Concurrent psychosocial therapy

• Judged to be at serious risk to self or others

• For people currently taking antidepressant medications, to be included in the study they must be on the medication for at least 3 months and for at least 6 weeks on the same dose

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Complicated Grief

Intervention

Behavioral:
• Complicated Grief Treatment
Complicated Grief Treatment (CGT) is a targeted psychotherapy for complicated grief. The treatment integrates principles, strategies and techniques from interpersonal psychotherapy, trauma-focused cognitive behavioral treatment and motivational interviewing. Treatment includes 16 sessions provided weekly.
• Interpersonal Therapy
Standard form of interpersonal psychotherapy delivered for 16 sessions weekly.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	Columbia University Medical Center	New York	New York

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
New York State Psychiatric Institute	National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (1)

Shear K, Frank E, Houck PR, Reynolds CF 3rd. Treatment of complicated grief: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005 Jun 1;293(21):2601-8. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Responder status on Complicated Grief Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale	Brief rating scale frequently used in clinical trials. For this study, version modified for complicated grief will be used. The rating will be done by the Independent Evaluator.	Week 20	No
Secondary	Change in score on Inventory of Complicated Grief (ICG) Scale	The ICG is a 19-item self-report instrument that assesses symptoms of CG. This scale has been utilized previously in treatment studies of CG. Random regression model will be applied to evaluate the score trajectory from baseline to week 20 and from week 20 to week 48.	Up to 48 weeks from baseline	No
Secondary	Change in score on Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS)	The WSAS is a modification of a scale introduced by Hafner and Marks (1976), consisting of 0-8 point ratings of the extent to which symptoms interfere with five areas of daily functioning: work, home management, private leisure, social leisure, and family relationships. It is a well-validated, widely used self-report measure. Random regression model will be applied to evaluate the score trajectory from baseline to week 20 and from week 20 to week 48.	Up to 48 weeks from baseline	No
Secondary	Change in score on Grief Related Avoidance Questionnaire (GRAQ) Scale	GRAQ is a questionnaire developed by the study investigators to elicit information related to avoidance of common situations and activities following the death. This scale has good psychometric properties and will be used to assess avoidance as a possible moderator predicting better outcome with CGT. It will be analyzed using random regression model.	Up to 48 weeks from baseline	No
Secondary	Change in results from Structured Interview for Complicated Grief (SCI-CG)	The SCI-CG is a clinician-administered structured interview developed for the study. It includes a composite of diagnostic criteria proposed by Horowitz and Prigerson. The interview was piloted and refined in the initial phase of current study.	Up to 16 weeks from baseline	No
Secondary	Change in results on Typical Beliefs Questionnaire (TBQ)	TBQ is a 34 item questionnaire evaluating how strongly subjects endorse certain beliefs that are common during bereavement related to self, the relationship, and perceptions of the world.	Up to 16 weeks from baseline	No

External Links

•   Study website