Compliant Behavior Clinical Trial
Official title:
Effectiveness of High Fidelity Simulation for Safety in the Medication Process in Intensive Care: Randomized Clinical Trial
Nursing plays an important role in the medication process in intensive care units. The application of active methodologies guided by the simulation strategy can help in the formation of qualified professionals and in the safer promotion of health care. The objectives to evaluate the effectiveness of the high fidelity simulation applied to nursing students in the process of administering drugs to critical patients in the intensive care setting; evaluate knowledge acquisition, satisfaction and self-confidence after the simulation. This is a prospective, single-blinded, controled clinical trial, with a quantitative approach. The sample will be composed of nursing students who are attending or have completed the discipline of critical care. The students will be randomized electronically to the experimental group, whose intervention will be guided by the high fidelity simulation method and, to the control group, the handling of static dummies / traditional teaching will be adopted as teaching strategy. Both strategies will emphasize the safety process during medication administration to critical patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit and will have an expository class dialogued prior to the intervention. Pre and post-tests will be applied at different times to evaluate the evolution of the level of knowledge and its retention and also, scales of satisfaction and self-confidence in learning. Descriptive and inferential statistics will be performed, as appropriate. It is believed that students submitted to simulation will have the opportunity to better consolidate knowledge during the training process, improve clinical and critical thinking, and decision-making, which will positively influence the safety of critically ill patients of the intensive care unit.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 76 |
Est. completion date | December 31, 2019 |
Est. primary completion date | December 31, 2019 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Students enrolled in the undergraduate nursing course of a public university in Brazil; Students coursing or who have completed critical care discipline. Exclusion Criteria: - Students with previous training in health. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Brazil | Breno de Sousa Santana | Brasília | Federal District |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University of Brasilia |
Brazil,
Adams AJ, Wasson EA, Admire JR, Pablo Gomez P, Babayeuski RA, Sako EY, Willis RE. A Comparison of Teaching Modalities and Fidelity of Simulation Levels in Teaching Resuscitation Scenarios. J Surg Educ. 2015 Sep-Oct;72(5):778-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.04.011. Epub 2015 May 20. — View Citation
Bingham AL, Sen S, Finn LA, Cawley MJ. Retention of advanced cardiac life support knowledge and skills following high-fidelity mannequin simulation training. Am J Pharm Educ. 2015 Feb 17;79(1):12. doi: 10.5688/ajpe79112. — View Citation
Choi I, Lee SM, Flynn L, Kim CM, Lee S, Kim NK, Suh DC. Incidence and treatment costs attributable to medication errors in hospitalized patients. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2016 May-Jun;12(3):428-37. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2015.08.006. Epub 2015 Aug 20. — View Citation
Cortegiani A, Russotto V, Montalto F, Iozzo P, Palmeri C, Raineri SM, Giarratano A. Effect of High-Fidelity Simulation on Medical Students' Knowledge about Advanced Life Support: A Randomized Study. PLoS One. 2015 May 8;10(5):e0125685. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125685. eCollection 2015. — View Citation
Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America; Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, editors. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2000. — View Citation
Marvanova M, Henkel PJ. Collaborating on medication errors in nursing. Clin Teach. 2018 Apr;15(2):163-168. doi: 10.1111/tct.12655. Epub 2017 Apr 24. — View Citation
Negri EC, Mazzo A, Martins JCA, Pereira GA Junior, Almeida RGDS, Pedersoli CE. Clinical simulation with dramatization: gains perceived by students and health professionals. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2017 Aug 3;25:e2916. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.1807.2916. English, Portuguese, Spanish. — View Citation
Renata Grou Volpe C, Moura Pinho DL, Morato Stival M, Gomes de Oliveira Karnikowski M. Medication errors in a public hospital in Brazil. Br J Nurs. 2014 Jun 12-25;23(11):552, 553-9. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Previous knowledge about the preparation and administration of intravenous drugs in intensive care (pre-test) | It will be measured by applying a "Knowledge Questionnaire" consisting of 5 objective questions to study participants. The minimum score on the test will be 0 points (worst score) and the maximum score will be 100 points (best score). | Questionnaire application prior to the intervention (pre-test) | |
Primary | Knowledge about the preparation and administration of intravenous drugs in intensive care (post-test) | It will be measured by applying a "Knowledge Questionnaire" consisting of 5 objective questions to study participants. The minimum score on the test will be 0 points (worst score) and the maximum score will be 100 points (best score). | Questionnaire application immediately after the intervention (post-test) | |
Primary | Knowledge about the preparation and administration of intravenous drugs in intensive care (1st retention) | It will be measured by applying a "Knowledge Questionnaire" consisting of 5 objective questions to study participants. The minimum score on the test will be 0 points (worst score) and the maximum score will be 100 points (best score). | Questionnaire application one month after intervention (1st retention) | |
Primary | Knowledge about the preparation and administration of intravenous drugs in intensive care (2nd retention) | It will be measured by applying a "Knowledge Questionnaire" consisting of 5 objective questions to study participants. The minimum score on the test will be 0 points (worst score) and the maximum score will be 100 points (best score). | Questionnaire application three months after intervention (1st retention) | |
Secondary | Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning | It will be measured through the application of the "Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning" scale, composed of 13 items. Each item should be marked on a scale from 1 (worst score) to 5 (best score), where 1 - strongly disagree with the statement; 2 - I disagree with the statement; 3 - I do not agree or disagree; 4 - I agree with the statement; 5 - strongly agree with the statement. | The scale will be applied in two distinct times: Time 1 - before the intervention; Time 2 - immediately after the intervention. | |
Secondary | Perceived gains from high fidelity simulation | It will be measured through the application of the "High-fidelity simulation gains on nursing education" scale, composed of 26 items related to the skills developed through the simulation strategy. Each item should be marked on a scale from 1 (worst score) to 5 (best score), where 1 - I get worse; 2 - remained the same; 3 - I have improved little; 4 - I have improved considerably; 5 - I have improved immensely. | The scale will be applied immediately after the intervention. |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03376152 -
Rural China Electric Kettle Promotion Program
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05775029 -
RSI Observation Follow-up
|
||
Completed |
NCT05031559 -
Episodic Future Thinking and Compassion
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04634019 -
Financially-Incentives to Improve Provider Compliance
|
N/A |