Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT04728594 |
Other study ID # |
2021-0128 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
January 15, 2021 |
Est. completion date |
January 20, 2021 |
Study information
Verified date |
July 2021 |
Source |
Geisinger Clinic |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
In this evaluation, two versions of emails will be sent to Geisinger employees who have not
been vaccinated against COVID-19. A delayed-contact control group will be emailed after a
delay of at least two days. The researchers hypothesize that either of the emails - which use
content informed by behavioral nudge theory - will lead to more COVID-19 vaccinations than
the delayed-contact control group.
Description:
The researchers aim to evaluate the effectiveness of email reminders in promoting COVID-19
vaccinations among Geisinger employees. The project will compare two emails, which will vary
in the subject line and email content. Both emails will test different approaches that draw
from principles in behavioral science: social proof, reframing, and scarcity. Employees
receiving these emails will be compared with employees in a delayed-contact group, who will
not receive emails. Employees in the control group will later receive one of the emails.The
responses to the emails will help determine the communications later sent to the control
group.
All emails will ask recipients if they want to receive a COVID-19 vaccination. If they click
on a hyperlink indicating yes, they will be forwarded to an online registration and
scheduling homepage. If they click on a hyperlink indicating no, they will be forwarded to an
online questionnaire surveying people about their main reason for declining the vaccine at
this time. The questionnaire will automatically present information intended to assuage the
specific concern that people endorse, followed by a hyperlink to the scheduling site.
The data will be analyzed with logistic regression models with the control group as the
reference group, to compare the two email conditions versus the control group. This set of
analyses will only be conducted for scheduling a vaccination appointment as opposed to email
engagement outcomes (e.g., number of emails opened), which will not be applicable for the
control group. A second set of logistic regression models predicting scheduling a vaccination
appointment and email engagement will also be run, comparing the two email conditions against
each other. The data will be examined two days later (to help decide which email to send to
the delayed-control group) and four days later (when the policy for employee vaccination will
change, making the content of the email irrelevant).
Update: The researchers looked at 3 days of data - as the emails to the delayed contact group
were only sent at that time - and 4 days of data when the policy for employee vaccinations
changed.