Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02401919
Other study ID # 520002003
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received March 11, 2015
Last updated March 24, 2015
Start date May 2014
Est. completion date May 2019

Study information

Verified date March 2015
Source Radboud University
Contact Maud Heinen, PhD
Phone +31 (0)24 3619750
Email Maud.Heinen@radboudumc.nl
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority Netherlands: ZonMw, Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and DevelopmentNetherlands: Medical Ethics Review Committee (METC)
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

COMMUNICATION - Feasibility and effectiveness 'Tell-us Cards' in hospital patients

- Objective - To investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of 'Tell-us Cards' on patient participation in basic care in hospital settings.

- Design - Cluster randomised controlled early trial design (Phase 2B, MRC Framework). Patients of two surgical and two medical wards (n=140) will be included in this study. Before and after the introduction of the intervention, assessments will take place in patients and nurses at these wards.

- Intervention - The 'Tell-us card' is a tool to elicit patients preferences and needs in basic care. Patients are invited to write down their specific questions and concerns. The cards are handed out to patients admitted to the hospital (daily). Patients and informal caregivers are invited to use the cards to state their preferences. Nurses are instructed to use the cards as a tool in their dialogue with the patient in making care plans, during ward rounds or for discharge information sessions.

- Comparison - Usual care

- Primary outcome - Patient perception of participation in care (Individualized Care Scale (ICS)

- Secondary - Use and content of the 'Tell-us Cards' actions taken by nurses as a consequence of what patients 'tell them' by means of the 'Tell-us Cards', Quality from the Patients' perspective (QPP), EQ-5D, and CQ satisfaction with communication & care in general


Description:

Feasibility and effectiveness of the 'Tell-us Card' Communication Tool on hospital patients' perception of participation and quality of Care.

The use of 'Tell-us Cards' in basic care is an intervention facilitating communication for enhanced patient participation in basic care. The effectiveness of the card is tested by Jangland et al (18) in a population of patients admitted to the hospitals surgical wards. The use of the 'Tell-us Card' in this patient group resulted in significant improvements in patients abilities to participate in decisions about their nursing and medical care. In our study we will investigate feasibility and effectiveness of the 'Tell-us cards' in three different hospital settings; patients admitted to the hospitals' surgical and medical wards and in patients attending the hospitals' emergency department.

Aim: The aim of this study is to investigate feasibility and effectiveness of 'Tell-us Cards' for patients participation in basic care in three different hospital settings. Description of the Intervention: The 'Tell-us card' (18) is a tool to elicit patients preferences and needs in basic care. Patients are invited to write down their specific questions and concerns for the day or before discharge. 'Tell-us Cards' are handed out on a daily basis to patients admitted to the hospital. Patients and their informal caregivers are invited to use the 'Tell-us Card' to state their preferences in basic care during their stay in the hospital. Nurses are instructed to use the 'Tell-us card' as a tool in their dialogue with the patient in making care plans, during ward rounds or for discharge information sessions.

Design: Feasibility and effectiveness of the 'Tell-us Card' will be tested in a controlled early trial design (Phase 2B, MRC Framework). Trained nurses will be handing out the 'Tell-us Cards' on a daily basis to patients admitted to the hospital. Baseline assessments on patient participation will be conducted at all wards in patients and nurses before the introduction of the 'Tell-us Cards'. For the baseline assessment; Nurses and patients will be asked to fill in a questionnaire. The nurses receive a questionnaire in their postbox at the ward they are working on with an envelope for returning the questionnaire to the researcher. Patients will be asked to fill in a questionnaire one week after discharge from the hospital or one week after their visit to the emergency department. Assessment of effects of the intervention in patients at T1 will start 3 months after the introduction of the 'Tell-us Cards' at the intervention wards. Nurses will be asked to fill in the questionnaire again 6 months after they filled in the first questionnaire.

Patients & Settings: Hospital patients admitted to two surgical wards and two medical wards (n=4x35=140) will be included in this study. One surgical ward, one medical ward will be randomly assigned to the intervention and control group. Baseline and follow up assessments will take place in 35 patients per assessment per ward, resulting in 165 assessments at baseline, and 165 assessments at follow-up. Outcomes: Primary outcome is patient perception of participation in individualised care. For measurement of patient participation in patients admitted to the hospital we will use the Individualized Care Scale for patients (19-23). Secondary outcomes will comprehend perception of quality of care, assessed with the Quality from the Patients' perspective (QPP) questionnaire (24, 25) as well as the use and content of the 'Tell-us Cards' and the actions taken by nurses as a consequence of what patients 'tell them' by means of the 'Tell-us Cards'. As generic tools we will use the EQ-5D for measurement of Quality of life (www.euroqol.org) and one question from the consumer Quality index for patient experience (www.centrumklantervaringindezorg). Furthermore nurses' perception of individualised care will be assessed at baseline and follow-up with the Individualized Care Scale for nurses.

Analysis: Results are clustered at ward level. We will therefore perform a random effects regression model to estimate the effects on (surgical and medical) patients' perceptions of Individualised Care for the intervention versus the usual care group at follow-up. In this analysis, ward will be entered as random effect, and covariates in the model are patients' perceptions of Individualised Care at each ward at baseline.

Descriptive analysis will reveal the topics patients regard as most important during their stay. A thorough process analysis on the use of the Card en the actions taken as a consequence of the content of the cards, will give insight in feasibility and effectiveness of the 'Tell-us Card' in daily practice.

Timeline (21 months): 1-6 (6m):Preparation time; 7-9 (3m):T0-Baseline assessment; 10-12 (3m):'Tell-us Card' Intervention Introduction; 13-15 (3m):T1-assessment; 16-21 (6m):Data analysis and study reporting


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 175
Est. completion date May 2019
Est. primary completion date December 2015
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Speaking the Dutch language

Exclusion Criteria:

- No serious cognitive impairments

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Subject), Primary Purpose: Supportive Care


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Behavioral:
Tell-us Card
Patients will be invited on a daily basis, during their stay in the hospital, to state what is important for them at that moment or before discharge

Locations

Country Name City State
Netherlands Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis Den Bosch Noord Brabant
Netherlands Radboud university medical center Nijmegen Gelderland

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Radboud University Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Netherlands, 

References & Publications (3)

Jangland E, Carlsson M, Lundgren E, Gunningberg L. The impact of an intervention to improve patient participation in a surgical care unit: a quasi-experimental study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 May;49(5):528-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.10.024. Epub 2011 Nov 20. — View Citation

Suhonen R, Gustafsson ML, Katajisto J, Välimäki M, Leino-Kilpi H. Nurses' perceptions of individualized care. J Adv Nurs. 2010 May;66(5):1035-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05256.x. Epub 2010 Mar 9. — View Citation

Suhonen R, Schmidt LA, Katajisto J, Berg A, Idvall E, Kalafati M, Land L, Lemonidou C, Välimäki M, Leino-Kilpi H. Cross-cultural validity of the Individualised Care Scale - a Rasch model analysis. J Clin Nurs. 2013 Mar;22(5-6):648-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04238.x. Epub 2012 Aug 9. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Change in the Individualised Care Scale score Patients will receive a questionnaire at discharge For patients at baseline and 4 months after the start start of the implementation proces No
Primary Change in Quality of Care Scale score Patients will receive a questionnaire at discharge At baseline and 4 months after the start start of the implementation proces No
Secondary Process analysis 'Content of the Tell-us Card' The content of what patients report to be important for them during their stay or before discharge will be inventorized 3 months (after finalising implementation) No
Secondary Process analysis 'follow-up activities on content of Tell-us Card' The follow up activities by patients or nurses or other health professionals involved in care will be inventorized as well as the number of patients receiving the card, the number of patients indicating what is important for them during their stay or before discharge, 3 months (after finalising implementation) No
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05203146 - PIMPmyHospital: a Mobile App to Improve Emergency Care Efficiency and Communication N/A
Completed NCT04105751 - Testing a Novel Manual Communication System for Mechanically Ventilated ICU Patients N/A
Completed NCT04595695 - The Effect of Clear Masks in Improving Patient Relationships N/A
Completed NCT05540444 - RadConnect Communication Application
Recruiting NCT04317664 - Intervention to Improve Driving Practices Among High-Risk Teen Drivers Phase 3
Completed NCT05812599 - Understanding COVID-19 Testing Knowledge and Practices Among 2-1-1 Helpline Callers N/A
Completed NCT03221985 - ESM Pilot: Mobile Phones and Psychology N/A
Completed NCT03203018 - Health Literacy and Cardiovascular Knowledge Workshop in Women From Disadvantaged Communities N/A
Completed NCT02695316 - Barrier-free Communication in Maternity Care of Allophone Migrants N/A
Completed NCT02619474 - The Effect of Whiteboards on Patient Satisfaction N/A
Completed NCT02267265 - Pilot Study of Novel Postpartum Educational Video Intervention N/A
Completed NCT01933789 - Improving Communication About Serious Illness N/A
Completed NCT01697137 - Patient and Physician Intervention to Increase Organ Donation N/A
Completed NCT01459744 - An Intervention to Improve Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Deactivation Conversations N/A
Recruiting NCT01170000 - Timely End-of-Life Communication to Parents of Children With Brain Tumors N/A
Completed NCT01040975 - Teen CHAT: Improving Physician Communication With Adolescents About Healthy Weight N/A
Completed NCT03044145 - The Cultural Formulation Interview-Engagement Aid N/A
Recruiting NCT04533126 - Channels of Communication & Brain Functioning: Pilot fMRI Study
Withdrawn NCT03901547 - Emotion Regulation and Burnout Impact on Communication Documentation N/A
Completed NCT06081660 - Advance Care Planning for Older Latinos With Chronic Illness N/A