Clinical Trials Logo

Communication Disabilities clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Communication Disabilities.

Filter by:
  • Recruiting  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT05808478 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Communication Disabilities

Eye-tracking Technology for Severe Communication Disability

Start date: January 22, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The aim of this project is to develop an Augmentative and Alternative Communication intervention through the use of Eye tracker system.

NCT ID: NCT04697212 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Communication Disabilities

Improving Communication and Healthcare Outcomes for Patients With Communication Disabilities

Start date: December 13, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

In the United States, 14% of all adults report a speech, language, voice, and/or hearing disability (collectively known as communication disabilities, CD). Patients with CD, experience inequities in receipt of and access to high-quality healthcare services, including primary care. Poor patient-provider communication is a significant contributor to these disparities. When healthcare providers use evidence-based communication strategies, patients with CD have improved communication outcomes and satisfaction. Unfortunately, providers rarely use the strategies in practice. The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness and implementation of two interventions to increase primary care providers' use of communication strategies, improving the quality of their communication with patients with CD. Using a stepped-wedge study design and guided by the RE-AIM framework, we will compare a healthcare team-directed intervention (training) to a healthcare team-directed intervention + patient-directed intervention (patient-prompt list). In the healthcare team-directed intervention, the team will receive training on evidence-based communication strategies for patients with CD. In the patient-directed intervention, patients with CD will complete a "patient prompt" list that elicits strategies that they prefer the healthcare team to use during their visit. The primary aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of the interventions on patient-reported experience in primary care practices across 4 healthcare systems using a stepped-wedge randomized controlled trial. Hypothesis 1: Patients with CD will report a higher quality of health, more positive experience, and greater self-efficacy when they use the patient-directed tool (intervention A+B) as compared to patients with CD in the healthcare team education-only phase (intervention A). Hypothesis 2. Providers will use more patient-centered communication and strategies with the patient-directed intervention. The second aim is to examine the adoption, implementation, and short-term sustainability of the interventions.