View clinical trials related to Common Wart.
Filter by:This is a Post-Market clinical Follow-up investigation to evaluate the safety and performed of the medical device Wortie Freeze Plus in the treatment of common and plantar warts.
A Phase 3 Study of A-101 Topical Solution Applied Twice a Week in Subjects with Common Warts
Phase 3 Study of A-101 Topical Solution in Subjects with Common Warts
A Phase 3 Study of A-101 Topical Solution Applied Twice a Week in Subjects with Common Warts
This is a Phase 2, open label study (Study number VP-102-105; referred to as COVE-1 [Cantharidin and Occlusion in Verruca Epithelium]) to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of VP-102 treatment in subjects with common warts. This study has two Cohorts.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of A-101 compared to Vehicle when applied to 1 Target common wart on the trunk or extremities twice a week.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of A-101 compared to vehicle when applied to 1 common target wart on the trunk or extremities.
Warts are benign epidermal tumors caused by human papilloma virus, which are epitheliotropic non-enveloped double stranded DNA viruses. Transmission of warts occurs from direct person-to-person contact or indirectly by fomites . Warts appear in various forms including verruca vulgaris, plane, plantar, filiform, digitate and periungual.
This study is a double-blinded, controlled clinical intervention trial to evaluate the efficacy of duct tape occlusions therapy for the treatment of common warts. 80 patients completed this study, and were randomized 1:1 to receive pads which contained either moleskin+transparent duct tape or moleskin alone. The patients wore the pad over the target wart for 7 days at a time, removed the pad on the evening of the 7th day, and replaced the pad on the 8th day. This cycle was repeated for 8 weeks or until the wart resolved. The hypothesis was that duct tape occlusion therapy would be more therapeutic than moleskin for the treatment of the common wart. However, in our study there was only 21% resolution rate in the duct tape arm vs. 22% in the control group.