Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT03901651 |
Other study ID # |
RV03-2019 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
January 2, 2019 |
Est. completion date |
January 1, 2021 |
Study information
Verified date |
June 2021 |
Source |
Instituto Ecuatoriano de Enfermedades Digestivas |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Colonoscopy is the standard of care for the detection of colorectal polyps and adenoma, and
colorectal cancer detection. Despite a meticulous evaluation of the colonic mucosa during
colonoscopy, a substantial number of colorectal polyps might be missed and colorectal cancer
might not be prevented.
Previous studies described a 12-28% of miss-rate for all polyps, a 31% for hyperplastic
polyps and 6-27% for adenomas, with a higher miss rate noted for smaller polyps. The lesion
missing rate depends on several factors, such as the location on difficult areas to be
evaluated with conventional colonoscopes (the proximal side of the ileocecal valve, haustral
folds, flexures or rectal valves), a flat shape, an inadequate bowel preparation and
inadequate endoscopy technique, a time-limited colonoscope withdrawal.
If the standard 140º angle of view colonoscope is used approximately 13% of the colonic
surface is unevaluated. The incorporation of colonoscopes with a 170-degree wide angled could
improve adenoma detection rate.
The introduction of high definition (HD) colonoscopes and visual image enhancement
technologies, such as narrow band imaging (NBI, Olympus America, Center Valley, PA), I-SCAN™
(Pentax Medical, Montvale, NJ) and Fuji Intelligent Chromo-Endoscopy (FICE™, Fujinon
Endoscopy, Wayne, NJ) have improved the lesion characterization; however, several studies
have failed to prove an increase in the adenoma detection rates.
The Third Eye Retroscope (Avantis Medical Systems, Sunnyvale, CA) is a disposable retrograde
viewing device advanced through the accessory channel of a standard colonoscope. It allows
retrograde viewing behind colonic folds and flexures simultaneously with the forward view of
the colon. Although it shows an increase in the adenoma detection rate by 11%-25%, it has
many disadvantages. First, it requires a separate processor and the device is disposable,
increasing the cost of the procedure. Second, it occupies the working channel of the
colonoscope, limiting the ability to suction. Third, if a polyp is detected, the viewing
device has to be removed in order to perform the polypectomy. Fourth, the optic is not high
definition and finally, the endoscopist has to get used to visualizing and processing two
simultaneous video streams from the colonoscopy and from the retroscope device.
Description:
The Retroview™ (Pentax Medical, HOYA Co.) colonoscope has a short turning radius at the
colonoscope tip, that allows a retroflexed view of the colon during withdrawal. This might
allow the detection of polyps hidden behind flexures, folds, and valves, from the cecum to
the rectum.
This device offers many advantages, such as the ability to provide a high definition view of
the proximal aspects of colonic folds, flexures, and valves with no additional equipment or
device costs. The image quality is high definition and the colonoscope also incorporates the
I-SCAN technology. The suction/work channel of the colonoscope is available for therapeutic
procedures. Polypectomy can be performed with the colonoscope during retroflexion, without
losing view of the polyp. The only disadvantages are the higher consumed withdrawal time
because the additional retroflexed withdrawal to the standard withdrawal and that a small
portion of the colon is obscured by the shaft of the colonoscope in retroflexion that may be
the reason why combined standard withdrawal with retroflexed withdrawal has proved to be
better than retroflexed withdrawal alone.
The aim of this study is to determinate the polyp and adenoma detection rate via performing a
colonoscopy using a conventional scope with standard withdrawal (forward view) and a combined
forward and retroflexed withdrawal technique using the RetroView™ colonoscope.
Lesion's dimensions and characteristics will be recorded to determine a difference between
both techniques.
MATERIALS AND METHODS Setting: Instituto Ecuatoriano de Enfermedades Digestivas (IECED), Omni
Hospital Academic Tertiary Center. We will include patients from January 2019 to November
2019. The study protocol and consent form has been approved by the Institutional Review Board
of our institution and will be conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki. Patients
will provide written informed consent.
Intervention: endoscopic technique. Participants will be submitted to two colonoscopies on
the same day. First, a standard colonoscopy will be performed using a conventional HD
colonoscope with I-Scan (EC 3490LK, PENTAX, Montvale, NJ) that has a 13.2 mm tube diameter
and a total length of 2023 mm). Then a second procedure, combining the standard forward view
and retroflexed withdrawal will be performed using the Retroview™ colonoscope (EC34-i10TL,
Pentax Medical, Montvale, NJ), that has an 11.6 mm tube diameter and 2023 mm length.
The endoscopy images will be seen on a 27-inch, flat panel, HD LCD monitor (Radiance™
ultra-SC-WU27-G1520 model). All participants will have the same colonic preparation with 4
liters of polyethylene glycol (PEG) the day before and bowel preparation will be evaluated
using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale.
Two endoscopists with proficiency in retroflexed withdrawal will perform the colonoscopies.
Colonoscopies will be performed in a tandem, random manner. First one endoscopist will
perform the conventional colonoscopy using standard withdrawal technique with standard
colonoscopes and then the second endoscopist blinded to the first colonoscopy results will
perform the second colonoscopy with the Retroview scope and combination withdrawal
(retroflexed with standard withdrawal). The operator assigned to each colonoscopy will be
chosen randomly. A minimum withdrawal time of 10 minutes will be required for each procedure.
After the examination, endoscopist will fill a questionnaire describing each polyp and
adenoma found, including the size and location. The withdrawal time spent in each procedure
will be measured.
Statistical analysis: Baseline characteristics will be analyzed using Chi-square o Fisher
Test for categorical variable and Mann-Whitney Test for continuous variables. If there is
more than one polyp in one patient it will be considered individually for statistical
purposes. A P value of less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. All the
statistical analysis will be performed using R.
Limitations: The protocol will be performed in a single-center by six endoscopists. A lack of
a control group because the intention is to compare two endoscopic techniques in the same
setting.