Colon Cleansing Efficacy With 1L vs. 2L vs. 4L-PEG for Colonoscopy Among Inpatients

Colon Disease Clinical Trial

— INTERPRET  

Official title:

Colon Cleansing Efficacy With 1L PEG Versus 2L PEG and 4L PEG for Colonoscopy Among Inpatients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT04708366
• Other study ID #: INTERPRET
• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Phase: Phase 4
• Start date: February 1, 2021
• Est. completion date: May 15, 2022

Study information

• Verified date: January 2021
• Source: University of Bologna
• Contact: Lorenzo Fuccio
• Phone: +39 051 2143338
• Email: lorenzofuccio[@]gmail.com
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

An adequate level of bowel preparation before colonoscopy has an extremely relevant impact on lesion detection and procedure success. The inpatient status represents a well-known independent predictor for inadequate colon cleansing. A recent prospective, multicentre, Italian study among inpatients showed that an adequate colon cleansing was achieved in 60-70% of patients, far below the ideal threshold of 90%. Interestingly, a higher rate of adequate colon cleansing was reported for a very low-volume (1L) polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based preparation when compared to 4L and 2L PEG-based solutions. However, this finding has to be confirmed as the study was not controlled and the PEG-1L group was much smaller than the other two.

Aim of the present multicenter randomized controlled study will be to assess and compare the efficacy and safety of a novel very-low volume (1L) PEG-based preparation vs. standard-of-care low-volume (2L) and high-volume (4L) PEG-based purge, among inpatients who undergo colonoscopy.

Description:

An adequate level of bowel preparation before colonoscopy has an extremely relevant impact on lesion detection and procedure success. The inpatient status represents a well-known independent predictor for inadequate colon cleansing. A recent prospective, multicentre, Italian study among inpatients showed that an adequate colon cleansing was achieved in 60-70% of patients, far below the ideal threshold of 90%. Such a low efficacy has several negative consequences: first, it leads to repetition of colonoscopy, therefore prolonging patients' in-hospital stay and increasing the risk of adverse events and costs; second, it augments the risk of missing colorectal lesions, negatively affecting patients' management and increasing costs due to the need for adjunctive diagnostic studies.

Current recommendations on bowel preparation among difficult-to-prepare patients are mostly based on expert opinions, the high-volume 4L polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based prep being considered as the gold standard, possibly with further additional solution. On the other hand, compliance to the bowel preparation has been related to an adequate colon cleansing, and it may be argued that inpatients might find it difficult to take high-volume purge. A recent Italian prospective multicentre study among inpatients showed similar rates of adequate bowel preparation between patients who underwent bowel preparation with and without additional solution. Interestingly, a higher rate of adequate colon cleansing was reported for a very low-volume (1L) polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based preparation when compared to 4L and 2L PEG-based solutions. However, this finding has to be confirmed as the study was not controlled and the PEG-1L group was much smaller than the other two.

Aim of the present randomized multicenter controlled study will be to assess and compare the efficacy and safety of a novel very-low volume (1L) PEG-based preparation vs. standard-of-care low-volume (2L) and high-volume (4L) PEG-based purge, among inpatients.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Enrollment: 846
• Est. completion date: May 15, 2022
• Est. primary completion date: March 15, 2022
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Inpatients scheduled for elective colonoscopy

• bowel preparation performed inside the hospital

• =18 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

• known or suspected ileus

• gastrointestinal obstruction

• gastric retention

• bowel perforation

• toxic colitis, or megacolon

• phenylketonuria

• glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency

• active intestinal bleeding

• emergency colonoscopy

• dementia or illness requiring nasogastric tube for bowel prep administration

• refusal to participate or inability to sign the informed consent

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Colon Disease
• Colonic Diseases

Intervention

Drug:
• NER1006
Patients will be randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive 1L PEG (PLENVU; Norgine, Amsterdam, Netherlands), administered as a 2-day evening/morning split-dosing, or the 2L PEG + ascorbate preparation (2LPEG - MOVIPREP; Norgine), or the 4L PEG (SELG-ESSE; Alfasigma Bologna, Italy), both administered as a 2-day evening/morning split-dosing regimen.
• MoviPrep
Patients will be randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive 1L PEG (PLENVU; Norgine, Amsterdam, Netherlands), administered as a 2-day evening/morning split-dosing, or the 2L PEG + ascorbate preparation (2LPEG - MOVIPREP; Norgine), or the 4L PEG (SELG-ESSE; Alfasigma Bologna, Italy), both administered as a 2-day evening/morning split-dosing regimen.
• Macrogol 400
Patients will be randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive 1L PEG (PLENVU; Norgine, Amsterdam, Netherlands), administered as a 2-day evening/morning split-dosing, or the 2L PEG + ascorbate preparation (2LPEG - MOVIPREP; Norgine), or the 4L PEG (SELG-ESSE; Alfasigma Bologna, Italy), both administered as a 2-day evening/morning split-dosing regimen.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Italy	Policlinico Sant'Orsola-Malpighi	Bologna

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University of Bologna

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Italy, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Proportion of patients with adequate colon cleansing	Efficacy will be assessed as the percentage of patients with adequate bowel cleansing, as rated according to the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). This scale gives 0-3 points to each of the three colonic segments (i.e. right colon, transverse colon, and left colon); 0 points are assigned for the worst segment cleansing, whereas at least 2 points stand for adequate segment cleansing. Adequate colon cleansing is defined when at least 2 points are reached in each colonic segment.	During the procedure.