Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03347422
Other study ID # EFC16216
Secondary ID 2017-003539-12BI
Status Completed
Phase Phase 3
First received
Last updated
Start date March 17, 2018
Est. completion date December 3, 2021

Study information

Verified date December 2022
Source Sanofi
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of Part A was to determine whether sutimlimab administration resulted in a greater than or equal to (>=)1.5 grams per deciliter (g/dL) increase in hemoglobin (Hgb) level and avoidance of transfusion in participants with primary cold agglutinin disease (CAD) without a recent history of blood transfusion. The purpose of Part B was to evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of sutimlimab in participants with primary CAD.


Description:

The planned total study duration per participant was approximately 1.5 to 2.5 years.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 42
Est. completion date December 3, 2021
Est. primary completion date December 3, 2021
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion criteria: - Body weight of >=39 kg at screening. - Confirmed diagnosis of primary CAD based on the following criteria: a) Chronic hemolysis, b) Polyspecific direct antiglobulin test (DAT) positive, c) Monospecific DAT strongly positive for C3d, d) Cold agglutinin titer >= 64 at 4 degree Celsius, and e) Immunoglobulin G DAT less than or equal to (<=) 1+, and, f) No overt malignant disease. - Hemoglobin level <= 10.0 g/dL. - Bilirubin level above the normal reference range, including participants with Gilbert's Syndrome. Exclusion criteria: - Cold agglutinin syndrome secondary to infection, rheumatologic disease, or active hematologic malignancy. - History of blood transfusion within 6 months of screening, or history of more than one blood transfusion within 12 months of screening. - Clinically relevant infection of any kind within the month preceding enrollment (example, active hepatitis C, pneumonia). - Clinical diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus; or other autoimmune disorders with anti-nuclear antibodies at screening. Anti-nuclear antibodies of long-standing duration without associated clinical symptoms would be adjudicated on a case-by-case basis during the confirmatory review of participant eligibility. - Positive hepatitis panel (including hepatitis B surface antigen and/or hepatitis C virus antibody) prior to or at screening. - Positive human immunodeficiency virus antibody at screening. - Treatment with rituximab monotherapy within 3 months or rituximab combination therapies (example, with bendamustine, fludarabine, ibrutinib, or cytotoxic drugs) within 6 months prior to enrollment. The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
sutimlimab (BIVV009)
Pharmaceutical form: solution for injection Route of administration: intravenous (i.v.)
placebo
Pharmaceutical form: solution for injection Route of administration: intravenous (i.v.)

Locations

Country Name City State
Australia Ballarat Oncology & Haematology Ballarat Victoria
Australia USC Health Clinics Buderim Queensland
Australia Monash Medical Centre Clayton Victoria
Australia Perth Blood Institute West Perth Western Australia
Austria Medical University of Vienna Vienna
Belgium ZNA Stuivenberg Antwerpen
Belgium University Hospitals Leuven Leuven
Canada McGill University Health Center Montréal Quebec
Canada St. Michael's Hospital Toronto Ontario
France CHU d'Angers Angers Cedex 9
France Hôpital de Caen Caen
France Centre Hospitalier Henri Mondor Créteil
France Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud Pierre-Bénite
Germany Gemeinschaftspraxis Hämatologie-Onkologie Dresden
Germany Universitätsklinikum Essen Essen
Germany Univ Ulm, Inst Klin. Transfusions. Immungen Ulm
Israel Hadassah Medical Center Jerusalem
Israel Laniado Hospital Netanya
Italy A. O. Spedali Civili di Brescia Brescia
Italy Fondazione IRCSS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Milan
Italy U.O.C. Ematologia- Policlinico "A. Gemelli" Rome
Italy U.O.C. Ematologia Ospedale San Bortolo Vicenza
Japan Japanese Red Cross Society Himeji Hospital Himeji Hyogo
Japan Saitama Medical University Hospital Iruma-gun Saitama-Ken
Japan Tokai University Hospital Isehara Kanagawa
Japan Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital Kanazawa Ishikawa-ken
Japan Aichi Medical University Hospital Nagakute
Japan Osaka University Hospital Suita Osaka
Netherlands Academisch Medisch Centrum Amsterdam
Netherlands Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum Leiden
Norway Haukeland University Hospital Bergen
Norway St Olavs Hospital, Avdeling for blodsykdommer Trondheim
Spain Hospital Clinci i Provincial de Barcelona Barcelona
Spain Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda Madrid
Spain Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio Sevilla
Spain Hospital Universitario Dr. Peset Valencia
United Kingdom St James Hospital, Leeds Leeds
United Kingdom Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital London
United Kingdom University College London London
United States Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston Massachusetts
United States Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts
United States Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio
United States Georgetown University Medical Center Georgetown District of Columbia
United States East Carolina University Greenville North Carolina
United States USC/Keck School of Medicine Los Angeles California
United States UW Hospitals and Clinics Madison Wisconsin
United States Montefiore Medical Center New York New York
United States Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania
United States University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
United States Washington University School of Medicine Saint Louis Missouri
United States Arizona Oncology Associates PC Tucson Arizona
United States New York Medical College at Westchester Medical Center Valhalla New York
United States Cleveland Clinic Florida Weston Florida

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Bioverativ, a Sanofi company

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  Australia,  Austria,  Belgium,  Canada,  France,  Germany,  Israel,  Italy,  Japan,  Netherlands,  Norway,  Spain,  United Kingdom, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Part A: Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment A participant was considered a responder: if he or she did not receive blood transfusion from Week 5 through Week 26 (end of treatment) and did not receive treatment for CAD beyond what was permitted per protocol. Additionally, participant's hemoglobin (Hgb) level must have increased to >=1.5 grams per deciliter (g/dL) from baseline (defined as last Hgb value before administration of first dose of study drug) at treatment assessment timepoint (defined as average of values from the Week 23, 25, and 26 visits). Percentage of responders was calculated together with 95% exact Clopper-Pearson confidence interval (CI). From Week 5 through Week 26
Primary Part B: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs (SAEs) Adverse Event (AE): any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. Treatment emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was congenital anomaly/birth defect, was medically important event. Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs): AEs that developed, worsened or became serious during the treatment-emergent (TE) period (from first investigational medicinal product [IMP] administration in Part B to last IMP administration + 9 weeks follow-up period). Part B, 6.5 g cohort: From first dose (Week 26) up to 149 weeks of treatment + 9 weeks of follow-up (i.e., up to Week 184); Part B, 7.5 g cohort: From first dose (Week 26) up to 137 weeks of treatment + 9 weeks of follow-up (i.e., up to Week 172)
Secondary Part A: Mean Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin (Hgb) Level at the Treatment Assessment Timepoint Mean change from baseline (Week 0) in Hemoglobin (Hgb) at the treatment assessment timepoint is reported in this outcome measure. Treatment assessment timepoint was defined as the average of the values from the Week 23, 25, and 26 visits. Least squares (LS) mean and 95 % confidence interval (CI) was assessed by Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) approach using heterogeneous Toeplitz (TOEPH) covariance matrix with change from baseline as the dependent variable and baseline value and visits as independent variables. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value prior to the first administration of study drug. Baseline (Week 0), treatment assessment timepoint (i.e., average of Week 23, 25 and 26)
Secondary Part A: Mean Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scale Score at the Treatment Assessment Timepoint FACIT-Fatigue scale consists of 13 questions assessed using a 5-point scale (0=not at all; 1 = a little bit, 2 = somewhat, 3 = quite a bit and 4 = very much). Responses to each question were added to obtain a total score. Total score ranged from 0 to 52, with higher score indicating more fatigue. Treatment assessment timepoint was defined as the average of the values from the Week 23, 25, and 26 visits. LS mean and 95% CI was assessed by MMRM approach using TOEPH covariance matrix with change from baseline (Week 0) as the dependent variable and baseline value and visits as independent variables. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value prior to the first administration of study drug. Baseline (Week 0), treatment assessment timepoint (i.e., average of Week 23, 25 and 26)
Secondary Part A: Mean Change From Baseline in Total Bilirubin Levels at the Treatment Assessment Timepoint Mean change from baseline (Week 0) in total bilirubin at the treatment assessment timepoint is reported in this outcome measure. Treatment assessment timepoint was defined as the average of the values from the Week 23, 25, and 26 visits. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value prior to the first administration of study drug. Baseline (Week 0), treatment assessment timepoint (i.e., average of Week 23, 25 and 26)
Secondary Part A: Mean Change From Baseline in Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) at the Treatment Assessment Timepoint Mean change from baseline (Week 0) in LDH at the treatment assessment timepoint is reported in this outcome measure. Treatment assessment timepoint was defined as the average of the values from the Week 23, 25, and 26 visits. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value prior to the first administration of study drug. Baseline (Week 0), treatment assessment timepoint (i.e., average of Week 23, 25 and 26)
Secondary Part A: Percentage of Participants With Solicited Symptomatic Anemia at Week 26 Symptomatic anemia was defined as having following symptoms: i. Fatigue; ii. Weakness; iii. Shortness of breath; iv. Palpitations, fast heartbeat; v. Light headedness and/or vi. Chest pain. Percentage of participants with solicited symptomatic anemia symptoms was reported in this outcome measure. Week 26
Secondary Part B: Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin (Hgb) Level at Each Specified Time Points Change from baseline (Week 0) in Hgb levels at each specified time points (i.e., Week 27, 29, 31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43,45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 63, 65, 67, 69, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, 83,85,87, 89,91, 93, 95, 97, 99,101,103, 105, 107,109, 111,113,115,117,119, 121,123, 125, 127,129,131,133,135,137,139,141,143,145,147,149,151,153, 155,157,159,161,163,165,167,169,171,173,175 and ET/SFU Visit) is reported in this outcome measure. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value prior to the first administration of study drug in Part A. Early Termination (ET) visit/safety follow up (SFU) visit was 9 weeks after administration of last dose (i.e., up to Week 184). Here, "0" in the number analyzed field signifies that none of participants were available for assessment at the specified timepoints. Baseline (Week 0), every 2 weeks starting from Week 27 till Week 175 and at ET/SFU visit (i.e., up to Week 184)
Secondary Part B: Change From Baseline in Total Bilirubin Levels at Each Specified Time Points Change from baseline (Week 0) in total bilirubin levels at each specified time points (i.e., Week 27, 29, 31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 63, 65,67,69,71,73,75, 77, 79, 81,83, 85, 87, 89, 91, 93, 95, 97, 99,101,103, 105, 107,109, 111,113,115,117,119, 121, 123, 125, 127,129,131,133,135,137,139,141,143, 145,147,149,151,153,155,157,159, 161,163,165,167,169,171,173,175 and ET/SFU Visit) is reported in this outcome measure. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value prior to the first administration of study drug in Part A. ET visit/SFU visit was 9 weeks after administration of last dose (i.e., up to Week 184). Here, "0" in the number analyzed field signifies that none of participants were available for assessment at the specified timepoints. Baseline (Week 0), every 2 weeks starting from Week 27 till Week 175 and at ET/SFU visit (i.e., up to Week 184)
Secondary Part B: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scale Score (Quality of Life) at Each Specified Time Points FACIT-Fatigue scale consists of 13 questions assessed using a 5-point scale (0=not at all; 1 = a little bit, 2 = somewhat, 3 = quite a bit and 4 = very much). Responses to each question were added to obtain a total score. The Total score ranged from 0 to 52, with higher score indicating more fatigue. Baseline (Week 0) was defined as the last non-missing value prior to the first administration of study drug in Part A. ET visit/SFU visit was 9 weeks after administration of last dose (i.e., up to Week 184). Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 39, 51, 63, 75, 87, 99, 111, 123, 135, 147, 159, 171 and ET Visit/SFU visit (i.e., up to Week 184)
Secondary Part B: Change From Baseline in 12-Item Short-Form Survey (SF-12) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) Scores at Each Specified Time Points SF-12: 12 item-questionnaire assessed health-related quality of life (HRQOL), contained 12 items, categorized into 8 domains (subscales) of functioning and well-being: physical functioning, role-physical, role emotional, mental health, bodily pain, general health, vitality and social functioning, with each domain score ranged from 0 (poor health) to 100 (better health). Higher scores = good health condition. These 8 domains were further summarized into 2 summary scores, PCS and MCS that ranged from 0 (poor health) to 100 (better health). Higher scores = better HRQOL. Baseline (Week 0): last non-missing value prior to first administration of study drug in Part A. ET visit/SFU visit: 9 weeks after administration of last dose (i.e., up to Week 184). Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 39, 51, 63, 75, 87, 99, 111, 123, 135, 147, 159, 171 and ET Visit/SFU visit (i.e., up to Week 184)
Secondary Part B: Change From Baseline in 5-level European Quality of Life 5- Dimensions 5-Level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Health State Utility Index and VAS Scores at Each Specified Time Points EQ-5D-5L included 2 components: health state utility index (descriptive system) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). EQ-5D descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 response option: no problem, slight problem, moderate problem, severe problem and extreme problems measured with Likert scale. EQ-5D-5L responses converted into single index utility score between 0 to 1. Higher score=better health. EQ-5D-5L VAS rated participant's current health state on scale from 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health). Baseline (Week 0): last non-missing value prior to first administration of study drug in Part A. ET visit/SFU visit: 9 weeks after administration of last dose (i.e., up to Week 184). Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 39, 51, 63, 75, 87, 99, 111, 123, 135, 147, 159, 171 and ET Visit/SFU visit (i.e., up to Week 184)
Secondary Part B: Number of Participants With Response to Participant's Global Impression of (Fatigue) Severity (PGIS) Questionnaire at Each Specified Time Points The PGIS is a self-reported scale. The PGIS is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participant's impression of disease severity using a 5-point scale ranging from 1 to 5, where 1=none, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe, 5=very severe. Higher scores indicated greater severity. ET visit/SFU visit was 9 weeks after administration of last dose (i.e., up to Week 184). Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 39, 51, 63, 75, 87, 99, 111, 123, 135, 147, 159, 171 and ET Visit/SFU visit (i.e., up to Week 184)
Secondary Part B: Number of Participants With Response to Participant's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Questionnaire at Each Specified Time Points PGIC is a self-administered questionnaire to evaluate the improvement or worsening compared to the start of the study. PGIC was assessed on a 7-point Likert scale ranged from 1 (greatly improved) to 7 (greatly worsened). Categories were defined based on the PGIC scores as follows: 1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved, 4=no change, 5=minimally worse, 6=much worse and 7=very much worsen. Higher scores indicated greater severity. ET visit/SFU visit was 9 weeks after administration of last dose (i.e., up to Week 184). Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 39, 51, 63, 75, 87, 99, 111, 123, 135, 147, 159, 171 and ET Visit/SFU visit (i.e., up to Week 184)
Secondary Part B: Mean Change From Baseline in Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) Level at Each Specified Time Points Change from baseline (Week 0) in LDH levels at each specified time points (i.e., Week 27, 29, 31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 63, 65, 67, 69, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, 83, 85, 87, 89, 91, 93, 95, 97, 99, 101, 103, 105, 107,109, 111, 113, 115, 117, 119, 121,123, 125, 127,129,131,133,135,137,139,141,143,145,147, 149, 151,153,155,157,159,161,163,165,167,169, 171, 173, 175 and ET/SFU Visit) is reported in this outcome measure. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value prior to the first administration of study drug in Part A. ET/SFU visit was 9 weeks after administration of last dose (i.e., up to Week 184). Baseline (Week 0), every 2 weeks starting from Week 27 till Week 175 and at ET/SFU visit (i.e., up to Week 184)
Secondary Part B: Number of Blood Transfusions Per Participant A participant was to receive a transfusion if his or her Hgb level met either of the following criteria: Hgb was <9 g/dL and the participant had symptoms of anemia or Hgb was <7 g/dL and the participant was asymptomatic. From Week 27 up to 149 weeks of treatment (i.e., up to Week 176)
Secondary Part B: Mean Change From Baseline in Haptoglobin Values at Each Specified Time Points Change from baseline (Week 0) in haptoglobin values at each specified time points (i.e., Week 27, 29, 31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 63, 65, 67, 69, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, 83, 85, 87, 89, 91, 93, 95, 97,99,101,103, 105, 107,109, 111,113,115,117,119, 121,123, 125, 127, 129,131,133,135,137,139,141,143, 145,147,149,151,153,155,157,159, 161,163,165,167,169,171,173,175 and ET/SFU Visit) is reported in this outcome measure. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value prior to the first administration of study drug in Part A. ET/SFU visit was 9 weeks after administration of last dose (i.e., up to Week 184). Haptoglobin values <0.2 were imputed as 0.2. Baseline (Week 0), every 2 weeks starting from Week 27 till Week 175 and at ET/SFU visit (i.e., up to Week 184)
Secondary Part B: Number of Healthcare Visits by Type In this outcome measure, number of healthcare visits which included non-study healthcare resource utilization visit (consisted mainly of extra visits to the office of the study doctor, visit to a generalist doctor or visit to a specialist doctor), hospitalization visit and visit to hospital emergency is reported. From Week 27 up to 149 weeks of treatment (i.e., up to Week 176)
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Suspended NCT05096403 - A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Pegcetacoplan in Patients With Cold Agglutinin Disease (CAD) Phase 3
Completed NCT05132127 - Sutimlimab (BIVV009) for the Adult Participants With Cold Agglutinin Disease (CAD) Who Have Completed Phase 3 Studies (CARDINAL or CADENZA) in Japan Phase 3
Completed NCT00960713 - The RITAI Cohort: An Observational Study on Rituximab Off-label Use for Auto-immune Disorders N/A
Completed NCT00373594 - Therapy for Chronic Cold Agglutinin Disease Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05931718 - Prospective Evaluation of Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients With Autoimmune Cytopenias Including Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia, Immune Thrombocytopenia, and Chronic Idiopathic/Autoimmune Neutropenia
Recruiting NCT05757570 - An Open-label Study of Povetacicept in Subjects With Autoimmune Cytopenias Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed NCT02689986 - Bendamustine and Rituximab Combination Therapy for Cold Agglutinin Disease Phase 2
Completed NCT01303952 - Therapy of Chronic Cold Agglutinin Disease With Eculizumab Phase 2
Completed NCT03226678 - Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Efficacy and PK of APL-2 in Patients With Warm Type Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia (wAIHA) or Cold Agglutinin Disease (CAD) Phase 2