Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT04063371 |
Other study ID # |
NEW-33307 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
October 14, 2019 |
Est. completion date |
July 7, 2020 |
Study information
Verified date |
May 2024 |
Source |
Ohio State University |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Observational
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Thus far no large randomized trial has demonstrated a correlation between screening and
improved outcomes. This would need to be done to gain widespread acceptance of screening and
case finding programs. Early detection of cognitive impairment could potentially result in
the appropriate treatment of reversible cognitive impairment conditions or earlier initiation
of pharmacological interventions for the management of a variety of other dementia or Mild
Cognitive Impairment (MCI) conditions. A screening approach that reduces the number of false
positive screens would improve the comfort level of physicians and patients with cognitive
screening programs.
The investigators propose to use the Self-Administered Gerocognitive Examination (SAGE) and
the Electronic Self-Administered Gerocognitive Examination (eSAGE) to identify patients who
score in the cognitive impairment range during an office visit with their primary care
provider. Conversation with an individual who knows the patient well (if possible) will be
performed to ascertain a significant change in the patient's cognitive skills over the
previous year. The investigators wish to determine if screening for cognitive impairment in
this way leads to new diagnoses and management outcomes compared to a group of primary care
providers who use their current usual method in screening for cognitive impairment during
office visits.
Description:
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center has over 100 primary care providers who see
patients at 14 offices in central Ohio. These providers routinely see geriatric patients and
routinely conduct Annual Wellness Visits.
At least two primary care offices will be involved in this trial. At least one location will
serve as the control office and will continue to conduct their visits including screening for
cognitive impairment as they normally do using their usual method based on the primary care
provider's normal practice. At least one different location will serve as the intervention
office where all the providers, as their standard of care, use a standardized method for
screening for cognitive impairment consisting of using the SAGE or eSAGE test and having a
conversation with an individual who knows the patient well (if possible) to ascertain if a
significant change (based on primary care provider opinion) occurred in the patient's
cognitive skills over the previous year.
Chart reviews will be conducted on all of the patients who meet the inclusion/exclusion
criteria for the trial using a 60 day window from the initial visit. The demographics,
medical history and list of current medications will be reviewed. SAGE or eSAGE test results
and the primary care provider's opinion of the informant information regarding the patient's
cognitive change over the previous year will be obtained. Additionally, the charts will be
reviewed for the number of referrals for further evaluation/management of potential cognitive
impairment (including lab work, neuroimaging, neuropsychology testing, neurology/psychiatry,
occupational therapy, physical therapy, speech therapy, counseling, respite care, legal
assistance (DPOA or living will), day care, home health, social work, financial planning, and
cognitive research), the initiation of pharmacological interventions for the management of
cognitive impairment and the diagnosis of cognitive impairment. Charts will also be screened
to assess the number of follow up visits that were scheduled after the office visit for
follow up regarding cognitive issues. For the intervention office, chart reviews will be
conducted on patients who complete the SAGE or eSAGE and on patients who do not complete the
SAGE or eSAGE. Possible reasons for why patients would not complete the SAGE or eSAGE
include: time constraints, patient noncompliance and provider oversight.
There will be 2 control groups. Control group 1 consists of primary care offices that did not
use SAGE or eSAGE for any of their patients and Control group 2 consists of patients handled
by the intervention office who did not complete the SAGE or eSAGE. Intervention group
consists of patients handled by the intervention office who did complete the SAGE or eSAGE.
SAGE and eSAGE test scoring will be compared between the intervention office and the research
site.
Upon completion of the trial, the providers from the intervention group will be requested to
complete a questionnaire to evaluate the practicality and ease of use of the SAGE and eSAGE
test.