View clinical trials related to Cochlear Hearing Loss.
Filter by:Patients with hearing loss who use cochlear implants (CIs) show significant deficits and strong unexplained intersubject variability in their perception and production of spoken emotions in speech. This project will investigate the hypothesis that "cue-weighting", or how patients utilize the different acoustic cues to emotion, accounts for significant variance in emotional communication with CIs. The results will focus on children with CIs, but parallel measures in postlingually deaf adults with CIs will be made, ensuring that results of these studies benefit social communication by CI patients across the lifespan by informing the development of technological innovations and improved clinical protocols.
Within-subject comparison. Remotely Evaluating latest Advanced Bionics Marvel Sound Processor for cochlear implants, from two adult groups.
This is a prospective study designed to evaluate the safety and performance of the HiResTM Ultra Cl HiFocusTM SlimJ Electrode and HiResTM Ultra 3D Cl HiFocusTM SlimJ Electrode (Ultra X) under normal conditions of use as it is approved for this device. Participants receive interventions as part of routine medical care.
In this clinical trial, an un-controlled, repeated measures open design with within-subject comparison will be used to evaluate the effect of Naída Link M90 hearing aid and Naída CI M90 sound processor on sound perception. This design was shown to be successful in previous studies for the evaluation of sound coding strategies. Furthermore, a within-subject comparison decreases the variance in the results allowing for fewer subjects when the population that uses the investigational device is not large in general.
The main objective of this study is to evaluate the correspondence between eCochG and residual hearing by adding two modifications. First, a novel technique for placing and maintaining the probe in place during the whole insertion will be used. Second, a new metric for estimating the eCochG response will be evaluated (eCochG trauma index). The secondary objective is to find other markers of the cochlear trauma insertion associated to eCochG measures. This will be used to evaluate to which extend a traumatic insertion will be deleterious for the patient's post-operative hearing, and ultimately to prevent trauma to the inner ear. Finally, the potential differences in cochlear trauma resulting of the electrode array insertion from two different surgery techniques will be investigated; Either using a manual insertion or using a robotic arm that will drive the insertion automatically.
In this clinical trial, an un-controlled, repeated measures open design with within-subject comparison will be used to evaluate the effect of the device under investigation on sound perception. This design was shown to be successful in previous studies for the evaluation of sound coding strategies. Furthermore, a within-subject comparison decreases the variance in the results allowing for fewer subjects when the population using the investigational device is not large in general.
This is a prospective study designed to evaluate the safety and performance of the HiResTM Ultra Cl HiFocusTM MS Electrode and HiResTM Ultra 3D Cl HiFocusTM MS Electrode (Ultra X) under normal conditions of use as it is approved for this device.
We recently developed a new Neuro-immersion system based on virtual reality and 3D (dimension) motion tracking. This tool makes it possible to evaluate and record the spatial localization performance of sounds and to highlight localization deficits in the three dimensions of space in deaf patients. Unfortunately, there is currently no suitable support to compensate for these localization deficits. However, the discomfort felt by the patients is clearly verbalized. Thanks to the new virtual reality system, we are now able to develop a training protocol based on spatial sound localization tasks.
This study aims to understand how to manipulate the electrical stimulation from the cochlear implant to maximize hearing stimulation and minimize facial stimulation. It is know from animal data that the hearing and facial nerves have different sensitivities to things like electrical pulse shape, its pattern, and its duration. It is very unclear however if this applies to human cochlear implant patients, and what the optimal parameters are to selectively stimulate the hearing nerve in humans. The outcomes of this study will be used to more selectively program some patients with severe facial nerve cross stimulation and to inform the development of new types of implant stimulation.
The investigators are interested in an additional hearing aid feature called non-linear frequency compression (NLFC). This aims to improve audibility of high frequency sounds by converting them into lower frequencies and has been shown to benefit those with moderate-severe sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). Cochlear dead regions (DRs) are areas of the inner hearing organ (the cochlea) where there is little or no function and are commonly found in regions responsible for detecting high pitched (frequency) sounds. Not all people with hearing loss have DRs. The investigators would like to determine whether based on the presence or absence of DRs, patients with moderate-severe SNHL perform better or prefer their hearing aids programmed conventionally, or with NLFC activated. To do this, two participant groups will be created based on findings from the threshold equalising noise (TEN) test which identifies cochlear DRs. Two participant groups will be created; one group with DRs and one group without DRs. All participants will receive two hearing aids and will wear these programmed conventionally for ~six weeks and with NLFC activated for ~six weeks in a counterbalanced manner. Following each condition, participants will complete a questionnaire and various speech tests will be performed. This involves participants repeating sentences, words or speech sounds they hear from a speaker in quiet and in the presence of background noise. Individuals' scores will be calculated for each test and their performance when NLFC was activated and deactivated will be compared. This will be analysed alongside the questionnaire data to compare the 'DR' and 'no DR' group in both conditions. Findings may help to determine whether NLFC should be activated for all moderate-severe SNHL patients, or just those with DRs, helping clinicians to optimise hearing aid settings for patients.