Simulation Training vs Workplace-Based Supervision in Psychiatry

Clinical Skills Training Clinical Trial

— EPIC-OSkER  

Official title:

A Randomised Trial of Simulation Training vs Workplace-Based Supervision for Junior Doctors in Psychiatry

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT01416727
• Other study ID #: 2011/051
• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• First received: August 12, 2011
• Last updated: September 6, 2011
• Start date: August 2011
• Est. completion date: December 2011

Study information

• Verified date: August 2011
• Source: King's College London
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: United Kingdom: National Health Service
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of two forms of clinical skills training for teaching emergency psychiatry skills to doctors who have just started to work in psychiatry

Description:

Junior doctors starting work in psychiatry soon encounter a number of situations in the workplace for which they have had little or no preparation either at medical school or from work in other specialities. They will encounter clinically complex situations such as rapid tranquillisation, crisis presentations of self-harm, suicide risk assessment, overseeing supervised confinement and making decisions to admit or discharge mentally ill patients. Furthermore, many of these situations occur out of hours when there is little direct senior supervision available. The traditional induction programme is delivered in a didactic format, which does not encourage effective learning, nor does it allow any opportunity to practise or acquire hands-on skills or non-technical skills such as interprofessional communication, leadership and situational awareness. In the interests of patient safety and improving the quality of care and patient's experience, there is an urgent need to identify ways of improving induction and quickly equipping junior doctors with the clinical skills necessary to practise safely in psychiatry. We propose to evaluate and compare two approached to improved skills training in psychiatry: 1. workplace-based observation and feedback; 2. simulation training.

All new junior doctors starting work in the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK, in August 2011 will be invited to take part in a randomised controlled trial of training in addition to the standard induction. Following a day of lectures on relevant clinical topics, participants will be randomly allocated to receive either observed workplace-based training by a more senior doctor during their on-call duties, or a two-day simulation-based training course. Before and after the training, assessments of participants' clinical skills and attitudes will be carried out by questionnaires and by observations of simulated clinical encounters. Changes in performance will be compared between the two groups. Longer term evaluation will be carried out by means of qualitative interviews and simulated clinical encounters once participants have been working for several months.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Enrollment: 48
• Est. completion date: December 2011
• Est. primary completion date: September 2011
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 22 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Junior doctors starting work at the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust in August 2011 in any of the following grades: 1. Core Psychiatric Training; 2. Foundation Training; 3. General Practice Vocational Training; 4. Core Trainee 1-3 equivalent posts, e.g. long-term locums

Exclusion Criteria:

• Unwillingness to participate in the study

• Inability to attend the training programme or participate in the evaluation

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor)

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Clinical Skills Training

Intervention

Other:
• Emergency Psychiatry Immersion Course
A two-day simulation-based training course covering assessment of self-harm, capacity, managing aggression, working with the emergency team and medical emergencies in the psychiatric hospital
• Observed SKills in the Emergency Room
For four weeks, participants will be accompanied by a senior psychiatric registrar or consultant psychiatrist, who has received training in giving feedback, during their on-call duties. Each participant will receive between 8-12 hours of 1:1 training.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United Kingdom	Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London	London

Sponsors (4)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
King's College London	Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, South London and Maudsley Charitable Funds, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United Kingdom, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Change in global clinical skills	Participants will participate in a single simulated clinical encounter. Encounters will be video-recorded and then rated by observers, who are blind to the allocation status and time point of each video, using a global rating scale.	Baseline; 4 weeks; 16 weeks	No
Secondary	Change in technical clinical skills	Participants will participate in a single simulated clinical encounter. Encounters will be video-recorded and then rated by observers, who are blind to the allocation status and time point of each video, using a checklist-based rating scale.	Baseline; 4 weeks; 16 weeks	No
Secondary	Change in attitudes towards teamworking	The Operating Room Management Attitudes Questionnaire will be modified to be appropriate for working in psychiatry.	Baseline; 4 weeks; 16 weeks	No
Secondary	Change in attitudes towards self-harm	The Attitudes to Deliberate Self-Harm Questionnaire	Baseline; 4 weeks; 16 weeks	No
Secondary	Self-reported views on usefulness and acceptability of the training programmes	Post-course feedback questionnaire	4 weeks	No
Secondary	Qualitative evaluation	Focus groups will be conducted to evaluate how participants have learned to manage psychiatric emergencies, and the contribution of the courses to their learning.	8 - 12 weeks	No