Clinical Efficacy Clinical Trial
Official title:
Ridge Preservation Comparing the Clinical and Histologic Healing of a PTFE Non-resorbable vs. a Collagen Membrane With an Intrasocket Mineralized Cancellous Allograft Plus a Facial Overlay Bovine Xenograft.
Verified date | May 2014 |
Source | University of Louisville |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | United States: Institutional Review Board |
Study type | Interventional |
A non-resorbable PTFE (teflon) membrane will be compared to a resorbable collagen membrane when used for a post-extraction ridge preservation procedure to prevent the bone loss that typically occurs. The hypothesis is that there will be no difference in the clinical and histologic results between the two membranes.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 30 |
Est. completion date | November 2013 |
Est. primary completion date | November 2013 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Have one non-molar tooth requiring extraction that will be replaced by a dental implant. The site must be bordered by at least one tooth. 2. Healthy male or female who is at least 18 years old. 3. Patients must sign an informed consent approved by the University of Louisville Human Studies Committee. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patients with debilitating systemic diseases, or diseases that have a clinically significant effect on the periodontium. 2. Presence or history of osteonecrosis of jaws. 3. Patients who are currently taking IV bisphosphonates or who had IV treatment with bisphosphonates irrespective of duration. 4. Patients who have been treated with oral bisphosphonates for more than three years. 5. Patients with an allergy to any material or medication used in the study. 6. Patients who need prophylactic antibiotics. 7. Previous head and neck radiation therapy. 8. Chemotherapy in the previous 12 months. 9. Patients on long term NSAID (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug) or steroid therapy. 10. Pregnant patients. - |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Graduate Periodontics Clinic, University of Louisville | Louisvile | Kentucky |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University of Louisville |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Crestal ridge width | The crestal ridge width will be measured with a digital caliper at the baseline exam and at the 4 month examination. | Time 4 months | No |
Secondary | Percent vital bone | A trephine core will be taken at 4 months immediately prior to implant placement from the implant osteotomy site. | Time 4 months | No |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT02575755 -
A Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetic and Efficacy Study of Azithromycin Plus Piperaquine as Presumptive Treatment in Pregnant PNG Women
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01902056 -
Implant Placement and Simultaneous Soft Tissue Grafting With Single or Double Layers of Acellular Dermal Matrix
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02467946 -
Hodgkin Lymphoma Treatment With Adcetris and Levact in the Old Patient
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT05144295 -
Lubiprostone for Functional Constipation in the Under 18 Years Patients
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05809258 -
Supraclavicular Versus Axillary Block for Arteriovenous (AV) Fistula Creation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05867784 -
Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on the Efficacy of Ustekinumab in the Treatment of Crohn's Disease
|