Cleft Palates Clinical Trial
Official title:
Efficacy of Preoperative Prophylactic Antibiotics in Preventing Complications in the Primary Repair of Cleft Palates
Verified date | January 2018 |
Source | University of Pittsburgh |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The primary objective of this study is to determine the efficacy of administering a single
dose of preoperative antibiotics to prevent complications in patients undergoing primary
closure of a cleft secondary palate. Secondary objective of this study is to evaluate the
effects of preoperative antibiotics administered on post operative outcome following primary
closure of cleft secondary palate. The study aims to assess the efficacy of prophylactic
antibiotics in cleft surgery to
- decrease the incidence of surgical sight infections
- speed the progression of postoperative healing
- improve the final quality of wound healing achieved
- decrease the rate of palatal fistula formation
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 224 |
Est. completion date | August 2015 |
Est. primary completion date | August 2015 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 3 Months to 18 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Children diagnosed as having cleft palates undergoing palatoplasty between the ages of 3 months and 18 years will be included in this study. Palatoplasty is the current standard of care in the sequence of treatment for cleft secondary palates. Pediatric plastic surgeons work primarily with children, and have undergone extensive training during their residencies and pediatric surgical fellowships to do so. Children will be evaluated initially at the Cleft-Craniofacial Center at the Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, which is set up to accommodate children of all ages and their families. Approximately 300 children will be required to contribute to a meaningful analysis. Exclusion Criteria: - All patients requiring prophylactic antibiotics for spontaneous bacterial endocarditis, with documented allergic reactions to the ampicillin-sulbactam, and with known immunodeficiencies or immunodeficiency associated syndromes, such as the 22q chromosomal deletion, will be excluded from study participation. - Selection will be based on the parent's willingness to allow their child to participate in the study. - Children already receiving antibiotics at the time of their surgery will be evaluated distinctly, though they will not be included in the antibiotic or the placebo groups |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Joseph Losee |
United States,
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Improved national prevalence estimates for 18 selected major birth defects--United States, 1999-2001. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2006 Jan 6;54(51):1301-5. — View Citation
Chuo CB, Timmons MJ. The bacteriology of children before primary cleft lip and palate surgery. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005 May;42(3):272-6. — View Citation
Crawford JJ, Fischer ND. Oral and respiratory flora of individuals with normal and repaired palatal clefts. Cleft Palate J. 1971 Apr;8:166-76. — View Citation
JOLLEYS A, SAVAGE JP. Healaing defects in cleft palate surgery--the role of infection. Br J Plast Surg. 1963 Apr;16:134-9. — View Citation
Lowbury EJL. Infection of Burns. Proc Soc Med. 1954; 47:231-232; 6. Jackson DM, Lowbury EJL, Topley E. Chemotherapy of Streptococcus pyogenes infection of burns. Lancet. 1951; 2:705-711
Marzoni FA, Kelly DR. Bacteremia following cleft palate repair--a prospective study. Ann Plast Surg. 1983 Jun;10(6):473-4. — View Citation
McClelland RMA, Patterson TJS. The influence of penicillin on the complication rate after repair of clefts of the lip and palate. Br J Plast Surg. 1963; 16:144-145
Mercer NS. The use of preoperative swabs in cleft lip and palate repair. Br J Plast Surg. 2002 Mar;55(2):176-7. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Number of Participants With Fistula or Delayed Wound Healing Following Palatoplasty | Primary outcomes of fistula or delayed wound healing following palatoplasty were measured in two groups of patients. This outcome measure addresses both objectives noted in the summary of the study description. | We anticipate a minimum of less than 2 months to a maximum of 1 year for follow-up will be necessary to document either stage 1 healing or the presence of a palatal fistula in nearly all cases. |