Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03412474
Other study ID # suprazygomatic block
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 2
First received
Last updated
Start date January 14, 2018
Est. completion date August 31, 2018

Study information

Verified date September 2018
Source Assiut University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Cleft palate (CP) is a common congenital malformation, with an incidence ranging from 0.1 to 1.1 per 1000 births depending on the population group (liau et al, 2010). Early surgery is necessary to reduce phonation and feeding difficulties and reduce complications such as frequent sinusitis and other respiratory tract infections (Takemura et al., 2002).

CP repair is painful, necessitating high doses of intravenous (I.V.) opioids. Therefore, the risk of postoperative respiratory depression and airway obstruction is important, and continuous monitoring is required during the initial 48h postoperatively (Roulleau et al, 2003).

Maxillary nerve block using the suprazygomatic approach is used in children since it presents a lower rate of complications (Captier et al, 2009). By this way, one can reach the nerve as it exits the skull at the foramen rotundum within the pterygopalatine fossa, before the location where its nervous branches innervate the palate (Prigge et al, 2014). This simple, reliable and almost risk-free approach can yield an effective and prolonged anesthesia with a clear decreased use of morphine agents during and after cleft lip-palate surgery in small children (Mesnil et al, 2010). The nerve block must be bilateral. The local anesthetic (LA) is directly injected in the middle part of the fossa at a distance from the foramen rotundum to avoid any trauma to the nerve or vascular injury, as soon as the tip of the needle has crossed the temporal muscle (Binet et al, 2015).

Various adjuvants to local anesthetics to increase the duration of block are described in the literature and used in the daily clinical practice. Dexmedetomidine is a selective alpha 2 (α2) adrenergic agonist with both analgesic and sedative properties. Animal studies showed that perineural dexmedetomidine added to bupivacaine or ropivacaine prolongs the duration of sensory and motor block (Brummett et al, 2011). Other clinical studies investigated the use of dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing ulnar nerve, axillary brachial and greater palatine nerve blocks, showed faster onset time and longer duration of block (Marhofer et al, 2013/ Esmaoglu et al, 2010& Obayah et al, 2010).


Description:

Preoperative assessment:

The day prior to surgery, all patients will undergo pre-anesthetic checkup including detailed history, physical, systemic examination and weight of the patient. All patients will be investigated for exclusion of any of the above mentioned contraindications. Laboratory work needed will include: Complete Blood Count (CBC); Prothrombin Time and Concentration (PT& PC); Partial Thromboplastin Time (PTT) and Bleeding Time (BT). All children will be kept nil per mouth 6-8 h for solids and 2 h for clear liquids.

Preparation of the patient:

Written consent and emergency resuscitation equipments including airway devices, pediatric advanced life support drugs for LA toxicity will be available.

Intraoperative management:

All patients in this study will be anesthetized by the same team of anesthesiologists and operated upon by the same surgeon who will be unaware of the study medications.

General anesthesia will be standardized for all patients in both groups using 8 MAC sevoflurane in 100% O2 with appropriate size face mask. Intraoperative monitoring will include ECG, pulse oximetry, noninvasive blood pressure, capnography and temperature probe. After intravenous access securing, endotracheal intubation with appropriate size to the patient's age will be performed after administration of 2 mg/kg propofol.

After orotracheal intubation, assisted mechanical ventilation using Ayre's T- piece will be used to maintain end-tidal carbon dioxide at 35±5 mmHg. General anesthesia will be maintained with 2-3 MAC sevoflurane.

Intraoperatively, patients will receive an infusion of normal saline 0.9% solution 4ml/ kg / h.

Bilateral SMB will be performed before surgery in anesthetized children, after aseptic preparation of the skin. The patient will be in supine position with the head in neutral position. The puncture site will be at the frontozygomatic angle, at the junction of the upper edge of the zygomatic arch and the frontal bone. A needle with 50 mm length and 25 gauge will be inserted perpendicular to the skin. It will be advanced to reach the greater wing of sphenoid at approximately 20 mm depth, then withdrawn a few millimeters and will be redirected toward the nasolabial fold in a 20° forward and 10° downward direction. The progression in the pterygopalatine fossa will be 35 to 45 mm. Loss of resistance after passing through the temporalis muscle will assist in determining the puncture depth. After a negative blood aspiration test, 0.2 ml/kg of the blinded study solution will be injected on each side (Captier et al, 2009).

MAP, HR, SPO2 and end-tidal CO2 will be recorded before induction of anesthesia, before block, after the block and every 10 minutes till end of surgery. Skin incision will be made 20 minutes after SMB block. An increase in HR and MAP above 20% of baseline values with skin incision will be considered as a sign of inadequate analgesia. In this case, fentanyl 1 µg/kg will be given intravenously, and the case will be excluded from the study.

Immediate complications related to regional anesthesia will be recorded:

- Systemic toxicity related to local anesthetics (seizures, heart rhythm, or conduction disorder)

- Bleeding at puncture site

- Pupil alteration and ocular lesion

Before the end of surgery, IV paracetamol 15 mg/kg and dexamethasone 0.2 mg/kg will be administered.

After completion of the surgical procedure, extubation will be done after ensuring adequate orogastric suction and patients will be transferred to the postanesthesia care unit (PACU).

In PACU: MAP, HR, modified CHEOPS, POV and sedation score will be recorded on admission to PACU, 1, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24h postoperatively by an observer who will be unaware of the study protocol.

Postoperative pain will be measured using a modified Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) (Taddio et al, 1995).

CHEOPS = SUM (points for all 6 parameters)

Interpretation:

- minimum score: 4

- maximum score: 13 Patients with modified CHEOPS > 6 will be given rescue analgesia with 15 mg/kg paracetamol intravenously. Those with modified CHEOPS of 4-5 will be given paracetamol 25-40 mg/kg as suppository. Pain scores will be recorded every 10 minutes after administration of rescue analgesia to evaluate pain relief or need for further rescue analgesia. The number of children who will need postoperative rescue analgesics and the duration of analgesia that will be taken at the time when an analgesic is required will be recorded.

Postoperative vomiting episodes will be recorded and treated with intravenous metoclopramide 0.5 mg/kg. Postoperative sedation will be assessed using sedation score described by Culebras et al, 2001 (1. Awake and alert. 2. Sleeping but easily arouses to voice or light touch. 3. Arouses to loud voice or shaking. 4. Arouses with painful stimuli only. 5. Unarousable).

Delayed complications of the blocks will be also investigated and recorded as hematoma, restricted mouth opening, vision, sensory or motor deficit, eating disorder, and local infection.

The parents will be asked to evaluate their satisfaction regarding pain control at the end of 48h postoperatively through 5-point Likertscale (1 = very satisfied, 2 = satisfied, 3 = neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 4 = dissatisfied, 5 = very dissatisfied).

Patients will be discharged from the hospital when they are pain free and there is no other medical reason to admit them to a surgical ward.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 80
Est. completion date August 31, 2018
Est. primary completion date August 31, 2018
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 1 Year to 5 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Age between 1 and 5 years

- Children scheduled for primary surgery for soft palate cleft or soft and hard palate clefts

- Gender: both

Exclusion Criteria:

- Parent refusal

- History of developmental delay or mental retardation, which will make observational pain intensity assessment difficult

- Hypersensitivity to any local anesthetics

- Bleeding diathesis

- Children with co-morbid conditions like congenital heart disease, respiratory pathology and central nervous system disorders

- Skin lesions or wounds at the puncture site of the proposed block

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Bupivacaine
The study drugs will be prepared by an anesthesiologist not involved in performing the block, patient care or in data collection. Patients will be randomly allocated into two groups of 40 patients each: Group A: will receive 0.2 ml/kg/side of bupivacaine (0.125%).
Dexmedetomidine
Group B: will receive 0.2 ml/kg/side of bupivacaine (0.125%) + 0.5 µ/kg of dexmedetomidine.
paracetamol
paracetamol

Locations

Country Name City State
Egypt Assiut University Hospital Assiut

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Assiut University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Egypt, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary modified Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) postoperative pain assessment in children minimum score: 4, maximum score: 13 Patients with modified CHEOPS > 6 will be given rescue analgesia 24 hours
Secondary time to first analgesia time of intravenous paracetamol requirment postoperatively 24 hours
Secondary 5-point Likert scale parent satisfaction score
(1 = very satisfied, 2 = satisfied, 3 = neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 4 = dissatisfied, 5 = very dissatisfied)
24 hours
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT00340977 - Svangerskap, Arv, Og Miljo (Pregnancy, Heredity and Environment)
Completed NCT05166408 - Fistiulation Rate Following Primary Cleft Repair≤ N/A
Recruiting NCT03839290 - Development of the Palate in Bilateral Orofacial Cleft Newborns One Year After Early Neonatal Cheiloplasty
Recruiting NCT01867632 - Acellular Dermal Matrix in Primary Furlow Palatoplasty N/A
Completed NCT02900014 - Validation of a Production Method of Stem Cell Isolated From the Nasal Cavity for an Innovative Cell Therapy of Cleft Palate N/A
Withdrawn NCT02953145 - The Use of Fibrin Sealant to Reduce Post Operative Pain in Cleft Palate Surgery Phase 4
Completed NCT04725370 - Characterization of Cleft Lip and Palate Conditions in Guatemala
Withdrawn NCT03572907 - Use of Titanium Plate in Rhinoplasty in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate : Aesthetic and Functional Impact.
Enrolling by invitation NCT02702869 - Allied Cleft & Craniofacial Quality-Improvement and Research Network (ACCQUIREnet)
Completed NCT02583100 - Improving Outcomes in Cleft Palate Surgery N/A
Recruiting NCT06072495 - Etiological Study of Persistent Velopharyngeal Insufficiency in Children With Operated Velopalatine Cleft by Analysis of Velopharyngeal Motor Skills in Static and Dynamic MRI N/A
Completed NCT04718558 - Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Measurement in Cleft Palate Repair
Not yet recruiting NCT05357092 - Effects of AlignBabyCleft (ABaCleft) N/A
Completed NCT01500109 - Efficacy of Oral Versus Intravenous Acetaminophen for Primary Pediatric Cleft Palate Repair N/A
Completed NCT01252264 - FaceBase Biorepository
Completed NCT00397917 - Oral Cleft Prevention Program Phase 3
Enrolling by invitation NCT03632044 - Evaluation of Trigeminal Nerve Blockade Phase 4
Completed NCT04277273 - Characteristics of a Maxillofacial Prosthesis Consultation Within Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris N/A
Completed NCT05405738 - Cleft Palate Technique and Maxillary Growth
Completed NCT03170505 - Using of Acellular Dermal Matrix in Cleft Palatal Fistula and Compare With Use of Conchal Cartolage N/A