Comparative Study Between Millard and Tennison Randall Techniques in Complete and Incomplete Cleft Lip Repair.

Cleft Lip, Unilateral Clinical Trial

Official title:

Comparative Study Between Millard and Tennison Randall Techniques in Complete and Incomplete Cleft Lip Repair.

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT06166238
• Other study ID #: Unilater cleft lip.
• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Start date: December 1, 2024
• Est. completion date: December 1, 2025

Study information

• Verified date: December 2023
• Source: Assiut University
• Contact: Sherif Saleh, officer
• Phone: +201068224
• Email: sherifabdelnasser.20[@]hotmail.com
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

"the investigators will compare the quantitative and qualitative (functional and aesthetic outcomes) of these two surgical approaches for repair of the unilateral cleft lip using an evaluation protocol developed many years ago by the research council of Operation Smile, a non- profit organization based in Virginia Beach, USA. Operation Smile delivers charity management of cleft lip and palate cases in many different developing countries around the world. Under this protocol, a dual rating system has been developed with two scores: one preoperative score concerning the severity of cleft and one score for the postoperative results.

Description:

One of the common congenital malformations in the head and neck is cleft lips. The prevalence of cleft lip is about 1:1000 of live birth; it also more common in boys and tends to present on the left side with a 6:3:1 ratio of left to right to bilateral. Many facial malformations, including cleft lip, are linked with environmental, maternal, and genetic factors, such as exposure to teratogen drugs, including isotretinoin, alcohol, or anticonvulsants. Similarly, some habits or diseases during pregnancy increase the risk of the cleft lip as smoking, pregestational and gestational diabetes, and specific nutritional deficiencies. The treatment begins soon after the child's birth and continues until adulthood. The purpose of cleft treatment is aesthetic and functional rehabilitation. Surgical repair is important for facial growth preservation, normal speech formation and development of proper dentition. The less number of interventions, the less the scaring results and hence, growth retardation Nowadays, the most commonly used techniques in managing unilateral cleft lip (UCL) are Millard's rotation advancement and Tennison Randall's triangular flap repairs. This study aimed to use anthropometric analysis by anthropometric measurements taken pre and post operation to evaluate the quantitative assessment of the modified Millard technique compared with the Tennison Randall technique in UCL repair.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Enrollment: 30
• Est. completion date: December 1, 2025
• Est. primary completion date: November 1, 2025
• Gender: All
• Age group: 3 Months to 6 Months

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patients are generally fit
• Patients with unilateral with or without cleft palate
• Patients with compliance for follow up.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Syndromic cases.
• Patients are generally unfit.
• Secondary cleft lip.
• Age less than 3 months, more than 4 years
• Bilateral cleft lip.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Cleft Lip
• Cleft Lip, Unilateral

Intervention

Procedure:
• Millard and Tension Randal Technique
Millard recognized that the majority of Cupid's bow, one philtral column, and the philtral dimple were intact on the medial aspect of a unilateral cleft lip but required rotation to shift the tissue into a normal anatomic position (Millard, 1964b) The Tennison-Randall technique involves a back-cut that extends from the cleft Cupid's bow peak toward the center of the philtrum that is filled by a laterally based triangular flap whose width is the measured deficiency in lip height.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Assiut University

References & Publications (3)

Jones MC. Facial clefting. Etiology and developmental pathogenesis. Clin Plast Surg. 1993 Oct;20(4):599-606. — View Citation

Parker SE, Mai CT, Strickland MJ, Olney RS, Rickard R, Marengo L, Wang Y, Hashmi SS, Meyer RE; National Birth Defects Prevention Network. Multistate study of the epidemiology of clubfoot. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2009 Nov;85(11):897-904. doi: — View Citation

Willhite CC, Hill RM, Irving DW. Isotretinoin-induced craniofacial malformations in humans and hamsters. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol Suppl. 1986;2:193-209. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	functional and aesthetic outcomes after repair	two scores: one preoperative score concerning the severity of cleft and one score for the Assessment of the results based on the post-operative scoring sheet included items for evaluating the integrity and symmetry of the Cupid's bow, nasal symmetry, lateral lip symmetry, vermilion contour, and white roll continuity. The individual scores for each factor were combined to yield an overall rating of poor, fair, good, and excellent.	6 months