Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT06105099
Other study ID # 12ZO323N
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date October 1, 2022
Est. completion date September 30, 2026

Study information

Verified date October 2023
Source University Ghent
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Speech therapy in children with a palate deals with two scientific challenges that will be addressed in this project. The first challenge is selecting the best speech approach for a child with a specific cleft speech characteristic (CSC). Many speech therapists use a 'one-size-fits-all' approach to treat compensatory CSCs resulting in poor short- and long-term speech outcomes. To increase the effectiveness and quality of cleft speech care, it is necessary to find the best match between a specific therapy and a given type of CSC. Therefore, this proposal will compare the effect of 3 different speech approaches on the speech and quality of life in Dutch speaking children with different types of CSCs. The second challenge is selecting the best speech approach to enhance long-term learning and transfer of newly established speech skills to untrained consonants. To date, research mainly focused on immediate therapy effects. It is unknown if permanent speech changes occur. Hence, this project will also investigate the short-term and long-term learning effects (retention and transfer) of the different speech approaches from the first objective. This proposal will improve evidence-based and patient-tailored cleft speech therapy.


Description:

Objective 1: To compare the (immediate) effect of three speech therapy approaches (i.e. a motor-phonetic approach, a phonological approach, and a combined phonetic-phonological approach) on the speech and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in Belgian Dutch-speaking children with a CP±L and different subtypes of compensatory CSCs (anterior oral CSCs, posterior oral CSCs, or non-oral CSCs) measured by perceptual and psychosocial outcome measures. Objective 2: To measure the short-term effects (performance to learning) and the long-term learning effects (retention and transfer) of the three different speech therapy approaches (i.e. a motor-phonetic approach, a phonological approach, and a combined phonetic-phonological approach) on the speech and HRQoL in Belgian Dutch-speaking children with a CP±L and different subtypes of compensatory CSCs measured by perceptual and psychosocial outcome measures.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 135
Est. completion date September 30, 2026
Est. primary completion date September 30, 2025
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 4 Years to 12 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Belgian Dutch-speaking children with a cleft palate with or without a cleft lip - Aged between 4 and 12 years - Presence of at least one compensatory speech error in their speech based on the perceptual assessment of one experienced speech-language pathologist Exclusion Criteria: - Children with syndromic clefts - Oronasal fistula - Velopharyngeal insufficiency - Hearing disabilities based on pure tone audiometry (>25 dB HL) - Cognitive and/or related learning disabilities or neuromuscular disorders

Study Design


Intervention

Behavioral:
Motor-phonetic intervention
Children will receive phonetic articulation therapy treating consonants in a phoneme-by-phoneme basis, emphasizing phonetic placement and shaping techniques. Phonetic articulation therapy includes a progression of the target consonant from isolated level, syllable level, word level, sentence level, spontaneous speech level in five different steps: identification of the target consonant using visual, tactile, and auditory feedback techniques, discrimination between the used and targeted consonant, (3) variation and correction, (4) stabilize the target, and (5) maintenance of the target. A next level will be introduced when the child is able to correctly produce the sound in 90% of the time with minimal cues from the therapist.
Phonological intervention
The phonological approach consists of two phases. In the first phase, the child's attention is drawn to the contrastive features of the speech sound system which are relevant to the target consonants. Terms that describe the sound features will be introduced using words on the child's level, e.g. in the case of active nasal fricatives the words 'nose' and 'mouth' will be used. Child-friendly games will be played to illustrate the contrast between the concepts followed by activities that focus on the contrasts in non-speech sounds, in which child and therapist will alternate between being listener and speaker. At the end of this phase, minimal word pairs (e.g. tap/cap), only produced by the therapist, will be used to facilitate the child's awareness of sounds in words and meaningful differences based on distinctive features. In the second phase, the child will produce minimal pairs providing the opportunity to monitor his/her speech and to make self-corrections.
Combined phonetic-phonological intervention
Children will receive motor-phonetic articulation therapy supplemented with phonological principles. Therapy will be provided following the same five steps as the 'motor-phonetic group'. However, articulation errors will not be treated in a phoneme-by-phoneme basis. In contrast, multiple errors will be targeted simultaneously by focusing on a process. For example, if the child produces glottal stops for the /t/ and the /p/, these sounds will be treated simultaneously as sounds requiring oral front placements. Exercises will be embedded in meaningful language contexts such as minimal pairs

Locations

Country Name City State
Belgium Department of Rehabilitation Sciences Ghent

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University Ghent Research Foundation Flanders

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Belgium, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Consonant proficiency Consonant proficiency will be measured in terms of percentage correctly produced consonants (%) Assessment immediately pre-intervention
Primary Consonant proficiency Consonant proficiency will be measured in terms of percentage correctly produced consonants (%) Assessment immediately post-intervention
Primary Consonant proficiency Consonant proficiency will be measured in terms of percentage correctly produced consonants (%) Assessment at 1 month post-intervention
Primary Consonant proficiency Consonant proficiency will be measured in terms of percentage correctly produced consonants (%) Assessment at 3 months post-intervention
Primary Consonant proficiency Consonant proficiency will be measured in terms of percentage correctly produced consonants (%) Assessment at 6 months post-intervention
Secondary Intelligibility in Context To assess possible transfer of learned speech skills to contexts outside the therapy setting, the Intelligibility in Context Scale (ICS) will be administered before and after intervention. The ICS rates the degree to which children's speech is understood by different partners (caregivers, immediate and extended family, friends, acquaintances, teachers, and strangers) on a 5-point scale (1 - never intelligible to 5 - always intelligible) Assessment immediately pre-intervention
Secondary Intelligibility in Context To assess possible transfer of learned speech skills to contexts outside the therapy setting, the Intelligibility in Context Scale (ICS) will be administered before and after intervention. The ICS rates the degree to which children's speech is understood by different partners (caregivers, immediate and extended family, friends, acquaintances, teachers, and strangers) on a 5-point scale (1 - never intelligible to 5 - always intelligible) Assessment immediately post-intervention
Secondary Intelligibility in Context To assess possible transfer of learned speech skills to contexts outside the therapy setting, the Intelligibility in Context Scale (ICS) will be administered before and after intervention. The ICS rates the degree to which children's speech is understood by different partners (caregivers, immediate and extended family, friends, acquaintances, teachers, and strangers) on a 5-point scale (1 - never intelligible to 5 - always intelligible) Assessment at 1 month post-intervention
Secondary Intelligibility in Context To assess possible transfer of learned speech skills to contexts outside the therapy setting, the Intelligibility in Context Scale (ICS) will be administered before and after intervention. The ICS rates the degree to which children's speech is understood by different partners (caregivers, immediate and extended family, friends, acquaintances, teachers, and strangers) on a 5-point scale (1 - never intelligible to 5 - always intelligible) Assessment at 3 months post-intervention
Secondary Intelligibility in Context To assess possible transfer of learned speech skills to contexts outside the therapy setting, the Intelligibility in Context Scale (ICS) will be administered before and after intervention. The ICS rates the degree to which children's speech is understood by different partners (caregivers, immediate and extended family, friends, acquaintances, teachers, and strangers) on a 5-point scale (1 - never intelligible to 5 - always intelligible) Assessment at 6 months post-intervention
Secondary Health-related quality of life To evaluate the psychosocial impact of the interventions, the Velopharyngeal insufficiency Effects on Life outcomes (VELO) questionnaire will be administered before and after the intervention. This tool consists of a caregiver and child report (for children older than 8 years) addressing different domains: speech limitation, swallowing problems, situational difficulty, emotional impact, perception by others, and caregiver impact.
The higher the score, the better the quality of life. The VELO-scores range from 0 (minimal quality of life) to 100 (maximal quality of life).
Assessment immediately pre-intervention
Secondary Health-related quality of life To evaluate the psychosocial impact of the interventions, the Velopharyngeal insufficiency Effects on Life outcomes (VELO) questionnaire will be administered before and after the intervention. This tool consists of a caregiver and child report (for children older than 8 years) addressing different domains: speech limitation, swallowing problems, situational difficulty, emotional impact, perception by others, and caregiver impact.
The higher the score, the better the quality of life. The VELO-scores range from 0 (minimal quality of life) to 100 (maximal quality of life).
Assessment immediately post-intervention
Secondary Health-related quality of life To evaluate the psychosocial impact of the interventions, the Velopharyngeal insufficiency Effects on Life outcomes (VELO) questionnaire will be administered before and after the intervention. This tool consists of a caregiver and child report (for children older than 8 years) addressing different domains: speech limitation, swallowing problems, situational difficulty, emotional impact, perception by others, and caregiver impact.
The higher the score, the better the quality of life. The VELO-scores range from 0 (minimal quality of life) to 100 (maximal quality of life).
Assessment at 1 month post-intervention
Secondary Health-related quality of life To evaluate the psychosocial impact of the interventions, the Velopharyngeal insufficiency Effects on Life outcomes (VELO) questionnaire will be administered before and after the intervention. This tool consists of a caregiver and child report (for children older than 8 years) addressing different domains: speech limitation, swallowing problems, situational difficulty, emotional impact, perception by others, and caregiver impact.
The higher the score, the better the quality of life. The VELO-scores range from 0 (minimal quality of life) to 100 (maximal quality of life).
Assessment at 3 months post-intervention
Secondary Health-related quality of life To evaluate the psychosocial impact of the interventions, the Velopharyngeal insufficiency Effects on Life outcomes (VELO) questionnaire will be administered before and after the intervention. This tool consists of a caregiver and child report (for children older than 8 years) addressing different domains: speech limitation, swallowing problems, situational difficulty, emotional impact, perception by others, and caregiver impact.
The higher the score, the better the quality of life. The VELO-scores range from 0 (minimal quality of life) to 100 (maximal quality of life).
Assessment at 6 months post-intervention
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Enrolling by invitation NCT05876169 - How Does Orthognathic Surgery Affect Jaw and Neck Motor Function? N/A
Recruiting NCT04455035 - DynaCleft® Effects on Soft Tissues and on Quality of Life for Incomplete Unilateral Cleft Lip Infants N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05031039 - Skeletal and Dental Maturational Stages in a Sample of Egyptian Subjects With Cleft Lip and Palate Deformity
Recruiting NCT03839290 - Development of the Palate in Bilateral Orofacial Cleft Newborns One Year After Early Neonatal Cheiloplasty
Recruiting NCT04771156 - Ketorolac in Palatoplasty Phase 4
Completed NCT04725370 - Characterization of Cleft Lip and Palate Conditions in Guatemala
Enrolling by invitation NCT02702869 - Allied Cleft & Craniofacial Quality-Improvement and Research Network (ACCQUIREnet)
Active, not recruiting NCT05971914 - Alveolar Cleft Hard- and Soft Tissue Reconstruction With an Autogenous Tooth Derived Particulate Graft N/A
Completed NCT03708406 - Otologic and Rhinologic Outcomes in Children With Clef Palate
Completed NCT06075069 - Evaluation of the Effect of Prosthetic Management for Congenital Cleft Lip and Palate Infants on the Middle Ear Function N/A
Completed NCT04384276 - Weigh Easy: Simplifying Home Weight Monitoring for Infants N/A
Recruiting NCT04619030 - Augmented Reality (AR): The Future of "Patient Information Leaflets N/A
Recruiting NCT03065686 - Identification of Genetic Factors Implicated in Orofacial Cleft Using Whole Exome Sequencing N/A
Completed NCT02845193 - Effect of Novel Nasoalveolar Molding Techniques on Parents' Satisfaction and Short Term Treatment Outcomes in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial N/A
Completed NCT03308266 - Electromyographic Analysis of the Masticatory Muscles in Cleft Lip and Palate Children With Temporomandibular Disorders N/A
Completed NCT01932164 - Use of Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Alveolar Bone Tissue Engineering for Cleft Lip and Palate Patients N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06411444 - Effect of Different Nasal Stent Designs With Nasoalveolar Molding Appliance N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06292234 - Patient Specific Implant Versus Miniplates for Advancement of Hypoplastic Maxilla N/A
Recruiting NCT05081258 - Influence of Presurgical Orthodontic Molding on the Growth of Newborns With Unilateral Cleft Lip Palate N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04791813 - Assessment of Maxillary Arch Depth and Width in a Group of Surgically Repaired Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Children Versus Normal Children .