Supraclavicular Nerve During Clavicle ORIF

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

Clavicle fractures are a common orthopedic injury and make up 2.6%-5% of all fractures. Despite the benefits of operative management, post-operative chest wall paresthesia is a well-known complication among surgeons and is well described in the literature. Studies reporting on the natural history of post-operative paresthesia report an incidence of chest wall numbness anywhere from 10-80% and this is attributed to iatrogenic injury of the branches of the supraclavicular nerve that provide sensation over the clavicle, anteromedial shoulder and proximal chest. While this may seem like an easy complication to avoid, anatomic studies give insight into the complex and unpredictable branching of the supraclavicular nerve. The aim of this study was to compare the area (cm2) and change in size over time of post-operative paresthesia (includes hypesthesia and dysesthesia) following ORIF of displaced clavicle fractures between nerve-sacrificing and nerve-preserving procedures.

Clinical Trial Description

This is a prospective, partially-blinded, single center, randomized controlled trial to compare the post-operative outcomes of paresthesias and morbidity between nerve-preserving and nerve-sacrificing procedures after surgical fixation of clavicle fractures. Although prior studies explore different incision orientation, most fail to specify whether or not the supraclavicular nerve branches were identified and protected and also lack a patient questionnaire that focuses on paresthesia characteristics and patient quality of life as it relates to the measured area of postoperative numbness. In this proposed study, the investigators will be able to fill this gap in knowledge and give insight into whether or not a nerve-sparing technique should be used to decrease the morbidity of postoperative chest wall paresthesia following operative fixation of clavicle fractures. This research will be important to the scientific community because it will help guide a physician's pre-operative counseling and establish realistic expectations for their patients. It could also guide a physician's surgical technique in a manner to decrease post-operative morbidity for patient's undergoing surgical fixation of clavicle fractures. 1. Group 1 - Operative treatment utilizing a supraclavicular nerve-sacrificing procedure 2. Group 2 - Operative treatment utilizing a supraclavicular nerve-preserving procedure ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT06050473
Study type	Interventional
Source	HealthPartners Institute
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase	N/A
Start date	November 2, 2016
Completion date	August 10, 2023

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Recruiting	`NCT03094481` - Interscalene vs. Superficial Cervical Block vs. Combination for Analgesia After Clavicle Fracture	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04161534` - KT Tape for Pediatric Clavicle Fractures	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT05579873` - Double Plating Versus Single Plating Techniques in Midshaft Clavicle Fractures
Not yet recruiting	`NCT05262998` - Intramedullary Screw Versus Plate in Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures	N/A
Completed	`NCT02769117` - Bone Ultrasound to Access Fracture Healing	N/A
Withdrawn	`NCT04986553` - A Multi-Center, Prospective Registry to Evaluate the Continued Safety and Performance of Clavicle Plates
Recruiting	`NCT05810129` - Crossed Education in Relation to Muscle Mass in Patients Operated of Clavicular Fracture	N/A
Enrolling by invitation	`NCT05327959` - A.L.P.S. Clavicle Plating System PMCF	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05867355` - Surgically Treated Displaced Mid-diaphyseal Clavicle Fractures
Completed	`NCT00872105` - Conservative Treatment Versus Operative Plate Fixation for Acute, Displaced Fractures of the Distal Clavicle	N/A
Withdrawn	`NCT00849771` - Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment for Scapula Fractures	N/A
Completed	`NCT05268874` - The Effectiveness of Clavipectoral Fascia Plane Block for Clavicle Surgery	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04250415` - Multi-Center Adolescent Clavicle Fracture Trial: Operative vs. Non-Operative Treatment
Withdrawn	`NCT01133769` - Operative Versus Non-Operative Treatment of Clavicle Fracture in PolyTrauma	N/A
Completed	`NCT06269562` - SPSIPB and CPB on Clavicle Surgeries	N/A
Completed	`NCT01405703` - Percutaneous Versus Open Plate Fixation of Diaphyseal Clavicle Fractures	N/A
Completed	`NCT01410032` - Reconstruction Plate Compared With Flexible Intramedullary Nailing for Midshaft Clavicular Fractures	Phase 2
Suspended	`NCT05454306` - Anser Clavicle Pin for Surgical Management of Midshaft Clavicle Fractures	N/A
Completed	`NCT03402269` - Treatment of Pediatric Mid-shaft Clavicle Fractures: A Prospective, Observational Study
Active, not recruiting	`NCT04622137` - Kinesiotaping Therapy for Clavicular Fractures FRACTURES:	N/A

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.