Clinical Trials Logo

Clavicle Fracture clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Clavicle Fracture.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT05268874 Completed - Clavicle Fracture Clinical Trials

The Effectiveness of Clavipectoral Fascia Plane Block for Clavicle Surgery

Start date: March 18, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Clavipectoral fascia plane block (CPB). CPB was defined by Valdes in 2017 firstly. It may be used for postoperative analgesia after clavicle surgery. In the literature, data about CPB is so limited, however it seems a good option for pain management after clavicle fracture. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the ultrasound-guided CPB for postoperative analgesia management and patient satisfaction in patients underwent clavicle surgery.

NCT ID: NCT05262998 Not yet recruiting - Clavicle Fracture Clinical Trials

Intramedullary Screw Versus Plate in Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures

PlaClaVis
Start date: November 1, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study compares two operative managements of midshaft clavicle fractures: intramedullary screw and plate fixation. In the past ten years, many studies have compared non operative management versus operative fixation and in particular plate fixation which has been well evaluated. But to date, there are only few retrospective studies that compares plate and intramedullary screw fixation and the knowledge about this last technique and its functional results is poor. The main objective of this study is to compare plate and intramedullary screw fixation, in term of functional results and rate of union. The hypothesis of this study is that there is superiority of plate over intramedullary screw fixation. The main evaluation criterion is the Constant Score at 3 months postoperatively.

NCT ID: NCT05231343 Recruiting - Clavicle Fracture Clinical Trials

Comparing Dual Mini-fragment Plating to Single Precontoured Plating of Acute Midshaft Clavicle Fractures Trial

COMPACT
Start date: April 4, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The rate of surgical fixation of fractures of the collarbone (i.e., midshaft clavicle) has exponentially increased in recent years; however, the rate of repeat procedures for removal of these implants (i.e., plates) due to irritation remains high. Despite technological advances in implant design, nearly one in four patients with a surgically fixed collarbone ultimately undergoes removal of their implant. More recently, there has been a growing body of literature demonstrating the effectiveness of using two smaller caliber plates, which have been found to have similar rates of implant removal. As such, the proposed randomized clinical trial seeks to be the first level I study to directly compare dual mini-fragment plating of acute displaced midshaft clavicle fractures to single precontoured plating. The investigators hypothesize that dual mini-fragment plating will result in lower rates of reoperation with similar rates of union and complication.

NCT ID: NCT04986553 Withdrawn - Clavicle Fracture Clinical Trials

A Multi-Center, Prospective Registry to Evaluate the Continued Safety and Performance of Clavicle Plates

Start date: May 20, 2021
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

The objective of the registry is to evaluate the continued safety and performance of Arthrex Clavicle Plates used to treat clavicle fractures.

NCT ID: NCT04622137 Active, not recruiting - Clavicle Fracture Clinical Trials

Kinesiotaping Therapy for Clavicular Fractures FRACTURES:

Start date: January 1, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This is a multicenter prospective randomized controlled study. Forty patients in whom conservative treatment for clavicle midshaft fractures was indicated between January 2018 and July 2019 were included. The investigators aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the kinesiotaping technique for the conservative treatment of clavicle midshaft fractures. The investigators hypothesized that kinesiotaping reduces the disadvantages of conservative treatment, such as early-phase pain, high nonunion rates, and a prolonged time to return to work, and yields better clinical and functional outcomes by providing good mechanical support and neutralizing the deforming muscle forces around the fractured clavicle.

NCT ID: NCT04343118 Completed - Clavicle Fracture Clinical Trials

Benefit of Surgical Hardware Removal Following Clavicle Fracture

Start date: January 1, 2015
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Little is known about the beneficial aspects of elective implant removal following plate osteosynthesis of displaced clavicle fractures.

NCT ID: NCT04332497 Withdrawn - Clavicle Fracture Clinical Trials

Clavipectoral Fascia Plane Block Versus Interscalen Brachial Plexus Block for Clavicle Surgery

Start date: April 10, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The pain after clavicle fracture surgery may be managed with combined superficial cervical plexus-interscalene block and recently clavipectoral fascia plane block (CPB). CPB was defined by Valdes in 2017 firstly. It may be used for postoperative analgesia after clavicle surgery. CPB may be an alternative to interscalene brachial plexus block. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of the US-guided CPB and ISCB for postoperative analgesia management after clavicle surgery. The primary aim is to compare perioperative and postoperative opioid consumption and the secondary aim is to evaluate postoperative pain scores (VAS), adverse effects related with opioids (allergic reaction, nausea, vomiting).

NCT ID: NCT04328558 Withdrawn - Clavicle Fracture Clinical Trials

Clavipectoral Fascia Plane Block for Clavicle Surgery

Start date: April 22, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The pain after clavicle fracture surgery may be managed with combined superficial cervical plexus-interscalene block and recently clavipectoral fascia plane block (CPB). CPB was defined by Valdes in 2017 firstly. It may be used for postoperative analgesia after clavicle surgery. CPB may be an alternative to interscalene brachial plexus block. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the US-guided CPB for postoperative analgesia management compare to no intervention control group after clavicle surgery. The primary aim is to compare postoperative opioid consumption and the secondary aim is to evaluate postoperative pain scores (VAS), adverse effects related with opioids (allergic reaction, nausea, vomiting).

NCT ID: NCT04250415 Recruiting - Clavicle Fracture Clinical Trials

Multi-Center Adolescent Clavicle Fracture Trial: Operative vs. Non-Operative Treatment

FACTS
Start date: March 11, 2013
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

Investigators from eight tertiary care, level 1 pediatric trauma centers have developed a protocol for the establishment of a formal, prospective multi-center adolescent clavicle registry, with designs for standardized radiographic assessment and the prospective collection of validated outcome measures and complications data, for all patients, ages 10-18, treated for clavicle shaft fractures, operatively and non-operatively. Eventually, the investigators would like to do comparative analysis for the operative and non-operative treatment arms, with additional sub-stratified analyses performed within these treatment arms by age and activity level. Among the primary goals of research projects stemming from the first arm of this registry, FACTS A, is to explore the hypothesis that non-operative treatment is associated with lower costs, greater safety, and equivalent or superior outcomes, compared with operative treatment, despite a national trend towards increasing surgical treatment. The second arm of the registry, FACTS B, will continue to investigate the same hypotheses, excluding cost outcomes, in patients only with completely displaced midshaft clavicle fractures.

NCT ID: NCT04161534 Recruiting - Clavicle Fracture Clinical Trials

KT Tape for Pediatric Clavicle Fractures

Start date: October 1, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Clavicle fractures in children are mostly managed non-operatively since they have an overall high union rate (95%) and a "good" functional outcome following nonoperative treatment. However, the downside of such a conservative approach is that patients have to live with pain and disability until the fracture heals. To minimize this, fractures are usually immobilized with a sling. There have been no studies looking at clavicle fractures treated with kinesiology (elastic) tape. No adverse effects (skin irritation, redness, etc.) are observed with the application of this tape. Elastic tape has previously been examined regarding muscular advantages rather than for healing fractures. Since this tape should immobilize fractures better than a sling, patients should experience less pain and disability associated with their fracture.