Circumcision Clinical Trial
Official title:
Evaluation of the ShangRing vs. Mogen Clamp for Early Infant Male Circumcision (EIMC) in Sub-Saharan Africa
Verified date | February 2021 |
Source | Weill Medical College of Cornell University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The study will evaluate the safety and acceptability of the topical anesthesia-based, no-flip ShangRing technique vs. Mogen clamp for Early Infant Male Circumcision (EIMC) in neonates and infants up to 60 days of life. The study will consist of 2 phases; a pilot phase and a field study. In the pilot phase, male infants of up to 60 days of life will be enrolled in three sub-Saharan countries, specifically Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda. Infants will be randomized in 1:1 fashion to undergo EIMC using either the Mogen clamp or no-flip ShangRing technique using topical anesthesia. Upon completion of the pilot trial and assuming satisfactory safety results, a larger non-comparative field study of ShangRing EIMC will be initiated, as performed by non-physician providers in routine practice settings in the three sub-Saharan African countries. Total study duration will be 3 years. The pilot phase is anticipated to encompass a total of 1 year. Completion of the field study is expected to take 2 years. Study Endpoints include: 1. To compare the rates of adverse events (AEs) with the ShangRing or Mogen clamp 2. To compare pain control, time to complete wound healing and parent satisfaction with EIMC using the ShangRing or Mogen clamp 3. To compare operative time and provider preference. 4. To assess the rate of spontaneous ring detachment with the ShangRing as a method to decrease the need for follow-up visits after circumcision. 5. To assess the subpreputial microbiome of the infants prior to and after the initiation of circumcision Three correlative studies will be conducted: 1. Penile microbiome study: In the pilot trial, the subpreputial microbiome of the infants undergoing circumcision will be assessed to better understand the spectrum of bacteria that may exist and play a role in infant circumcision. 2. Demand creation study: During both the pilot phase and the field study, it will be assessed whether device-driven EIMC can be safely and effectively integrated into maternal and child health services as a method to promote demand creation. 3. Cost impact study: During both the pilot phase and the field study, a comparative cost analysis of EIMC with ShangRing versus Mogen clamp will be performed, in addition to a cost analysis of ShangRing EIMC as performed in routine clinical settings in the field study. The costing of demand creation will also be assessed.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 1380 |
Est. completion date | December 18, 2020 |
Est. primary completion date | December 18, 2020 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | Male |
Age group | N/A to 60 Days |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. Male infants from 24 hours up to 60 days of life 2. Gestational age =37 weeks 3. Normal birth weight (=2.5 Kg) 4. No illness requiring medical treatment 5. No penile abnormality requiring surgical repair (e.g. hypospadias, chordee) 6. No family history of bleeding disorders 7. Consent provided by at least one parent/legally acceptable representative (LAR) of the infant 1. Parent or LAR must be able to understand study procedures and requirements of study participation; 2. Parent or LAR must agree to return the client to the study site for the full schedule of follow-up visits after his circumcision; 3. Parent or LAR must have a cell phone or access to a cell phone Exclusion Criteria: - Not meeting one or more of the inclusion criteria - Consent not provided by parents/legally acceptable representatives of the infant - If parent(s)/legally acceptable representative(s) decline(s) the procedure or is/are uncomfortable with the procedure - Babies <6 weeks of age to mother without previous T.T. vaccination during ANC visits for that pregnancy - Babies >6 weeks of age without DPT vaccination - Any other valid health-related issues as judged by the health workers |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Kenya | Homa Bay County Teaching and Referral Hospital | Homa Bay | |
Tanzania | Iringa Regional Referral Hospital | Iringa | |
Uganda | Rakai Health Sciences Program | Kalisizo | Rakai |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Weill Medical College of Cornell University | Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, George Washington University, Jhpiego, Johns Hopkins University, Population Council, Rakai Health Sciences Program |
Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda,
Albert LM, Akol A, L'Engle K, Tolley EE, Ramirez CB, Opio A, Tumwesigye NM, Thomsen S, Neema S, Baine SO. Acceptability of male circumcision for prevention of HIV infection among men and women in Uganda. AIDS Care. 2011 Dec;23(12):1578-85. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2011.579939. Epub 2011 Jul 7. — View Citation
Auvert B, Taljaard D, Lagarde E, Sobngwi-Tambekou J, Sitta R, Puren A. Randomized, controlled intervention trial of male circumcision for reduction of HIV infection risk: the ANRS 1265 Trial. PLoS Med. 2005 Nov;2(11):e298. Epub 2005 Oct 25. Erratum in: PLoS Med. 2006 May;3(5):e298. — View Citation
Bailey RC, Moses S, Parker CB, Agot K, Maclean I, Krieger JN, Williams CF, Campbell RT, Ndinya-Achola JO. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in young men in Kisumu, Kenya: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007 Feb 24;369(9562):643-56. — View Citation
Binagwaho A, Pegurri E, Muita J, Bertozzi S. Male circumcision at different ages in Rwanda: a cost-effectiveness study. PLoS Med. 2010 Jan 19;7(1):e1000211. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000211. — View Citation
Gray RH, Kigozi G, Serwadda D, Makumbi F, Watya S, Nalugoda F, Kiwanuka N, Moulton LH, Chaudhary MA, Chen MZ, Sewankambo NK, Wabwire-Mangen F, Bacon MC, Williams CF, Opendi P, Reynolds SJ, Laeyendecker O, Quinn TC, Wawer MJ. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in men in Rakai, Uganda: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2007 Feb 24;369(9562):657-66. — View Citation
Hewett PC, Hallett TB, Mensch BS, Dzekedzeke K, Zimba-Tembo S, Garnett GP, Todd PE. Sex with stitches: assessing the resumption of sexual activity during the postcircumcision wound-healing period. AIDS. 2012 Mar 27;26(6):749-56. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32835097ff. — View Citation
Jarrett P, Kliner M, Walley J. Early infant male circumcision for human immunodeficiency virus prevention: knowledge and attitudes of women attending a rural hospital in Swaziland, Southern Africa. SAHARA J. 2014;11:61-6. doi: 10.1080/17290376.2014.929530. Epub 2014 Jun 24. — View Citation
Kalichman SC. Neonatal circumcision for HIV prevention: Cost, culture, and behavioral considerations. PLoS Med. 2010 Jan 19;7(1):e1000219. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000219. — View Citation
Kankaka EN, Murungi T, Kigozi G, Makumbi F, Nabukalu D, Watya S, Kighoma N, Nampijja R, Kayiwa D, Nalugoda F, Serwadda D, Wawer M, Gray RH. Randomised trial of early infant circumcision performed by clinical officers and registered nurse midwives using the Mogen clamp in Rakai, Uganda. BJU Int. 2017 Jan;119(1):164-170. doi: 10.1111/bju.13589. Epub 2016 Sep 6. — View Citation
Kigozi G, Gray RH, Wawer MJ, Serwadda D, Makumbi F, Watya S, Nalugoda F, Kiwanuka N, Moulton LH, Chen MZ, Sewankambo NK, Wabwire-Mangen F, Bacon MC, Ridzon R, Opendi P, Sempijja V, Settuba A, Buwembo D, Kiggundu V, Anyokorit M, Nkale J, Kighoma N, Charvat B. The safety of adult male circumcision in HIV-infected and uninfected men in Rakai, Uganda. PLoS Med. 2008 Jun 3;5(6):e116. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050116. — View Citation
Mavhu W, Hatzold K, Laver SM, Sherman J, Tengende BR, Mangenah C, Langhaug LF, Hart G, Cowan FM. Acceptability of early infant male circumcision as an HIV prevention intervention in Zimbabwe: a qualitative perspective. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e32475. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032475. Epub 2012 Feb 27. — View Citation
Mugwanya KK, Whalen C, Celum C, Nakku-Joloba E, Katabira E, Baeten JM. Circumcision of male children for reduction of future risk for HIV: acceptability among HIV serodiscordant couples in Kampala, Uganda. PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22254. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022254. Epub 2011 Jul 20. — View Citation
Pintye J, Baeten JM, Manhart LE, Celum C, Ronald A, Mugo N, Mujugira A, Cohen C, Were E, Bukusi E, Kiarie J, Heffron R; Partners PrEP Study Team. Association between male circumcision and incidence of syphilis in men and women: a prospective study in HIV-1 serodiscordant heterosexual African couples. Lancet Glob Health. 2014 Nov;2(11):e664-71. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70315-8. Epub 2014 Oct 22. — View Citation
Plank RM, Makhema J, Kebaabetswe P, Hussein F, Lesetedi C, Halperin D, Bassil B, Shapiro R, Lockman S. Acceptability of infant male circumcision as part of HIV prevention and male reproductive health efforts in Gaborone, Botswana, and surrounding areas. AIDS Behav. 2010 Oct;14(5):1198-202. doi: 10.1007/s10461-009-9632-0. — View Citation
Tobian AA, Gray RH, Quinn TC. Male circumcision for the prevention of acquisition and transmission of sexually transmitted infections: the case for neonatal circumcision. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010 Jan;164(1):78-84. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.232. — View Citation
Tobian AA, Gray RH. The medical benefits of male circumcision. JAMA. 2011 Oct 5;306(13):1479-80. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1431. — View Citation
Tobian AA, Kigozi G, Wawer MJ, Serwadda D, Quinn TC, Gray RH. Herpes simplex virus type-2 assay specificity and male circumcision to reduce herpes simplex virus type-2 acquisition. AIDS. 2013 Jan 2;27(1):147-9. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32835aa181. — View Citation
Tobian AA, Serwadda D, Quinn TC, Kigozi G, Gravitt PE, Laeyendecker O, Charvat B, Ssempijja V, Riedesel M, Oliver AE, Nowak RG, Moulton LH, Chen MZ, Reynolds SJ, Wawer MJ, Gray RH. Male circumcision for the prevention of HSV-2 and HPV infections and syphilis. N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 26;360(13):1298-309. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802556. — View Citation
UNAIDS/WHO/SACEMA Expert Group on Modelling the Impact and Cost of Male Circumcision for HIV Prevention. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in high HIV prevalence settings: what can mathematical modelling contribute to informed decision making? PLoS Med. 2009 Sep;6(9):e1000109. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000109. Epub 2009 Sep 8. Review. Erratum in: PLoS Med. 2009 Dec;6(12). doi: 10.1371/annotation/f1c3679d-18d8-4fbd-bd3f-59db0b284b19. — View Citation
Waters E, Li M, Mugisa B, Bowa K, Linyama D, Stringer E, Stringer J. Acceptability and uptake of neonatal male circumcision in Lusaka, Zambia. AIDS Behav. 2013 Jul;17(6):2114-22. doi: 10.1007/s10461-012-0297-8. — View Citation
Westercamp N, Bailey RC. Acceptability of male circumcision for prevention of HIV/AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa: a review. AIDS Behav. 2007 May;11(3):341-55. Epub 2006 Oct 20. Review. — View Citation
Young MR, Bailey RC, Odoyo-June E, Irwin TE, Obiero W, Ongong'a DO, Badia JA, Agot K, Nordstrom SK. Safety of over twelve hundred infant male circumcisions using the Mogen clamp in Kenya. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e47395. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047395. Epub 2012 Oct 17. — View Citation
Young MR, Odoyo-June E, Nordstrom SK, Irwin TE, Ongong'a DO, Ochomo B, Agot K, Bailey RC. Factors associated with uptake of infant male circumcision for HIV prevention in western Kenya. Pediatrics. 2012 Jul;130(1):e175-82. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-2290. Epub 2012 Jun 18. — View Citation
* Note: There are 23 references in all — Click here to view all references
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Number and severity of adverse events in participants undergoing circumcision with either device based on WHO/JHPIEGO definitions and guidelines. | Adverse events will be pre-specified based on WHO/JHPIEGO definitions of the nature and severity of adverse events, and classified as related or unrelated to EIMC. Adverse events will also include device-related malfunctions and displacements. | Up to 8 weeks post-circumcision. | |
Secondary | Pain scores associated with the circumcision procedure by either device, assessed using the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS). | Pain scores will be recorded at the time of circumcision procedure using NIPS. NIPS is based on facial expression, crying, breathing patterns, movement of arms and legs, and state of arousal of the infant. A score of 0 is classified as no pain while a score of 6 is most severe. | At the time of circumcision procedure. | |
Secondary | Time to complete wound healing based on having an intact clean scar with no dehiscence. | Circumcision wound is examined at each follow-up visit to check for complete healing. Additional follow-up visits may be needed if complete healing was not reported at the end of scheduled visits. | Till complete wound healing is reported, up to 8 weeks post-circumcision. | |
Secondary | Parent satisfaction based on post-circumcision interviews. | Parents will be interviewed after their infant had undergone circumcision to express their views on the procedure. They will be required to note whether they are satisfied or dissatisfied about different aspects relating to the procedure and the study. | Up to 8 weeks post-circumcision. | |
Secondary | Operative time measured in minutes. | Providers will record, in minutes, the amount of time required to complete the circumcision procedure with the ShangRing and Mogen clamp. Recorded time will not include duration of anesthesia administration, or duration for the anesthetic to take effect. | At the time of circumcision on procedure day. | |
Secondary | Provider preference of circumcision device based on post-circumcision interviews. | Health providers who will perform the circumcision procedures using the ShangRing and Mogen clamp will be interviewed to express their views and degree of satisfaction with the devices. | Up to 8 weeks post-circumcision. | |
Secondary | Spontaneous detachment as a measure to decrease the need of follow-up visits based on the amount of time, in days, it takes for the device to fall off on its own. | Parents/LARs of infants who underwent ShangRing circumcision will be asked about the date of device detachment if the device is no longer attached at the time of visit. | Up to 4 weeks post-circumcision. |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Terminated |
NCT02498483 -
Acetaminophen and Post Circumcision Pain Control
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT05590052 -
Bipolar Electrosurgery Versus Thermocautery in Circumcision With Safe Anesthetic Techniques
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01998360 -
Rapid, Minimally-invasive Voluntary Adult Male Circumcision
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04092998 -
Circumcision With Use of Thermocautery and Histopathological Changes
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT00572754 -
Phase II Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Dry Circumcision Method
|
Phase 2 | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT05617261 -
Evaluating Patient Tolerability and Success for Penile and Scrotal Urologic Procedures Under Conscious Sedation: A Prospective Study
|
||
Completed |
NCT05175027 -
Preoperative Antiseptic in Newborn Circumcision Comparison of Povidone Iodine and Hypochlorous Acid Used
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00971958 -
Infant Male Circumcision in Gaborone, Botswana, and Surrounding Areas: Feasibility, Safety and Acceptability
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03619369 -
Circumcision and Breastfeeding
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03575377 -
Opioid Use, Storage, and Disposal Among Pediatric Patients After Surgery
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01877408 -
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Open Surgical vs. Rapid, Minimally-invasive Voluntary Adult Male Circumcision
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01494272 -
Analgesia in Children Using Caudal Epidural Ropivacaine
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01909609 -
Parents' Knowledge and Perception of Benefits and Risks Regarding Neonatal Circumcision
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01477593 -
Circumcision With a Novel Disposable Device in Chinese Children: a Hospital-based Randomized Controlled Trail
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03046290 -
Pudendal Block Versus Penian Block For Circumcision In Children
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05284734 -
Comparison of Caudal Block and Erector Spinae Block for Postoperative Analgesia
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04273035 -
Handheld-multimedia Versus Oral Midazolam in Pediatric on Perioperative Anxiety
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT06177834 -
Alisklamp and Dorsal Slit Sleeve Circumcision
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04268511 -
Caudal Epidural Block Versus UltrasoundāGuided Pudendal Nerve Block for Pediatric Circumcision
|