View clinical trials related to Cicatrix, Hypertrophic.
Filter by:This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of Thermo-mechanical system for fractional ablation associated triamcinolone acetonide drug delivery for the treatment of Hypertrophic scars and Keloids.
Comparison of the Efficacy of Different Steroids in the Treatment of Abnormal Scars (Keloids and hypertrophic Scars)
A prospective, randomized, controlled study. The patients were divided into two groups with twenty patients per group. The control group received the standard treatment for postburn scars. The treatment group received the standard treatment and treatment of postburn scars with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy 512 impulses of 0.15mJ/mm 2 in each session, twice per week for 4 weeks. The investigators assessed the appearance of scar with the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), pruritus and pain with Visual Analog Scale (VAS) before the start of the treatment and at 2 weeks and 5 months after the treatment.
Purpose of the study: The purpose of the study is to evaluate the therapeutic effect of cryotherpy in treating hypertrophic scar. It will be hypothesized that: Cryotherapy may not have an effect on hypertrophic scar.
This study will look at silicone tape compared to the current no dressing standard at the investigators institution, to determine if silicone tape provides a significant improvement in post-abdominoplasty scar appearance. Silicone tape will be added to half of the abdominoplasty incision of patients undergoing abdominally-based breast reconstruction procedures two weeks after their operation. They will be followed up and assessed at specific timepoints to determine whether the silicone improves scar outcomes in these patients.
The investigators developed a portable pressure measuring device using silicon piezoresistive pressure sensors. As PicoPress® is the most accurate (i.e., lowest variation and error) manometric sensor for pressure measurement, the investigators used it to compare and examine the accuracy of the proposed device regarding in vitro pressure measurements. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of pressure garment therapy using proposed device with objective data obtained with a randomized within wound comparison. Pressure measurements were acquired through a readout circuit consisting of an analog-to-digital converter, a microprocessor, and a Bluetooth transmission module for wireless data transmission to an external device. The mean pressure values measured by the sensors were compared to those obtained from PicoPress®. This was a double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial of patients with hypertrophic scars. In the pressure monitoring group, garment pressures were monitored using the portable pressure measuring device, and the compression garment was adjusted so that the pressure was maintained at the therapeutic range of 15 - 25 mmHg. In the control group, non-surgical standard treatment of burn scars except for pressure monitoring was performed in the same manner.
Comparing between the effect of Fractional Microneedling Radiofrequency Versus Intralesional Steroid Injection with and without Microneedling on Tissue levels of PDGF & CTGF in Hypertrophic Scars
Hypertrophic Burn Scars (HTBS) are often treated with Fractional CO2 laser therapy to improve cosmetic appearance. It has been noted that this leads to a reduction in the pain and itch associated with this type of scars. While this phenomenon is commonly described in the literature, the mechanism of pain and itch reduction in unclear. The investigators aim to better understand this process by histological evaluation of HTBS at different stages of laser treatment.
The study will evaluate the effect of intradermal injection of stromal vascular fraction into suture line on wound healing and scarring.
Executive Summary Hypertrophic scars are irregular, raised scars that can cause debilitating symptoms including pain, pruritus, and restricted movement in nearby joints. There are also often significant psychosocial elements with these scars that are especially significant in the vulnerable pediatric population and their parents. Current scar treatment modalities are limited. In recent years, the advent of ablative fractional laser (AFL) resurfacing technology has shown great promise but there remains a need to expand high-level evidence and develop optimal laser treatment parameters for patients. In this study, the investigators aim to evaluate the efficacy of ablative fractional CO2 laser treatment of hypertrophic scars in children and define a set of laser treatment parameters to develop a treatment protocol that maximizes the safety and efficacy of AFL therapy in the pediatric population. This will be a prospective split-scar clinical trial at Alberta Children's Hospital. A sample size of 44 scars will be sufficient to detect a clinically significant improvement in total POSAS score, our primary outcome measure. Children (age 1- 17) who present with hypertrophic scarring following an acute injury or burn may be included in the study. All patients will receive standard scar treatment modalities and will be followed by our plastic surgery team and rehabilitation team. Each scar being studied will be split into two halves which will be assigned a unique "Site ID" that will be recorded in a data collection sheet and used to identify scars for assessment. All laser treatments will be performed by a single surgeon using the UltraPulse CO2 Laser (Lumenis, Israel) and will be done at the Alberta Children's Hospital in the main operating room under a general anesthetic. Patients will receive laser treatments at 4 to 8-week intervals for a total of 3 sessions. A combination of the SCAAR FX and Deep FX treatment modes, with or without Active FX treatment mode, will be used according to individual patient and scar characteristics. Data collection includes demographic data and original burn data. Assessment tools including the POSAS and SCAR-Q questionnaires, clinical photographs, and cutometer will be used at various time points to document changes in scar appearance and pathology over the study period. Mean values for the cutometer measurements as well as the POSAS and SCAR-Q questionnaires will be compared between laser-treated and control scar sites. Each of these datasets will be tested for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Non-parametric data will be compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank test and parametric data will be compared using Student's t-tests.