Chronotropic Incompetence Clinical Trial
Official title:
Comparison of Physiologic Response With Rate Adaptive Pacing Driven by Minute Ventilation and Accelerometer
Some patients' heart rates do not increase as needed during activities and exercise, which can make them feel tired and fatigued easily. The patients in this study have a pacemaker with a FDA approved rate response sensor, which senses activity level by sensing motion (through a component known as an accelerometer) and/or breathing changes (known as minute ventilation). These changes in motion or breathing make the pacemaker increase the patient's heart rate. This study is being conducted to see which rate response sensor is better (motion driven or breathing driven). The study is also investigating whether optimizing the sensor based on the individual patient will give better results in terms of increasing the patient's exercise capacity. The hypothesis is that rate responsive pacing driven by the minute ventilation sensor results in improved functional capacity compared to accelerometer in chronotropically incompetent patients.
This study is a double-blind, randomized, two-arm (with crossover to other arm) trial that
will investigate the benefit of rate responsive pacing with either MV or XL in pacemaker
patients that have chronotropic incompetence (CI). Blinding will occur for both the patient
and the research personnel who are collecting primary endpoint data. The study will enroll
patients that have an implanted dual/single chamber pacemaker, which has both the minute
ventilation (MV) and accelerometer (XL) rate-adaptive sensors.
The initial study visit called as baseline visit for newly implanted patients (at 2 weeks
from implant) and for previously implanted patients (at the time of enrolling in the study).
Patients will complete a 6-min walk test at the baseline study visit to screen for CI based
on the intrinsic heart rate achieved during the walk while pacemaker set to DDD/VVI with
both sensors set to passive. All patients that are enrolled in the study will get treadmill
exercise stress test by chronotropic assessment exercise protocol (CAEP) to confirm CI.
Patients will be determined to have CI by completing a maximal effort exercise treadmill
stress test with peak perceived exertion by Borg scale of >16 (18) with the pacemaker
programmed to DDD/VVI with both device sensors set to passive. Patients that do not meet the
criteria of CI after CAEP treadmill test will not continue in the trial.
Patients that have CI will then be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to programming the
rate-adaptive sensor to either MV or XL. The MV or XL rate-adaptive sensor will be optimized
for each patient using stress test derived age predicted maximum heart rate by adjusting
response factor to achieve MCR slope of 1.
At the 4-week visit, patients that have CI will complete a second CAEP treadmill test in
their randomized setting with pacer set as DDDR/VVIR. They will also complete 6-minute walk
test and pacemaker interrogation. They will be crossed over to the other sensor group at
this time by changing the sensor setting.
At 8 week visit, patients will have another CAEP treadmill test, 6-minute walk test and
pacemaker interrogation in their randomized crossed over group setting.
Patients that have CI will get quality of life assessment using SF-36 questionnaire and
Aquarel questionnaire at baseline visit, 4 and 8 week visit in their randomized setting.
;
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03871803 -
β-blockers Withdrawal in Patients With HFpEF and Chronotropic Incompetence: Effect on Functional Capacity (Preserve-HR)
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01030705 -
Common Sensing and Right Ventricular Automatic Capture (COGNATE)
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT01619800 -
The Effect of Blended Sensor Efficiency on Relieving the Heart's Inability to Increase Its Rate During Exercise
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02693262 -
Comparing Rate Response With CLS Versus Accelerometer ICD Settings in Heart Failure Patients With BIOTRONIK CRT-Ds
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05649787 -
Effects of a Supervised Training Program on Functional Capacity in Patients With HFpEF and Chronotropic Incompetence
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03235843 -
Rate Adaptive Atrial Pacing in Heart Failure
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02145351 -
Efficacy Study of Pacemakers to Treat Slow Heart Rate in Patients With Heart Failure
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03844516 -
Pacing in Left Ventricular Assist Device Recipients
|
N/A |