Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04938037
Other study ID # 2021/353
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date June 1, 2021
Est. completion date June 1, 2022

Study information

Verified date June 2021
Source TC Erciyes University
Contact Isa Cüce, Assist. Prof
Phone +903523368884
Email dr.icuce@hotmail.com
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of the suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) at the spinoglenoid notch with SSNB at the suprascapular notch, which is the most commonly used technique in patients with chronic shoulder pain.


Description:

Chronic shoulder pain (>3 months) is one of the most common musculoskeletal problems leading to psychosocial problems. Its causes include subacromial impingement, tendinosis, calcific tendinitis, complete or partial tendon tears, adhesive capsulitis, subacromial bursitis, glenohumeral osteoarthritis, glenohumeral instability, and acromioclavicular joint pathologies. For the treatment of chronic shoulder pain, conservative or surgical methods can be applied. Suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) is an effective and safe treatment option for pain relief and increases in functional activity in these patients. The suprascapular nerve (SSN) is a peripheral nerve has both motor and sensory fibers, originates from the ventral rami of C5-C6 nerve roots. SSN passes across the posterior triangle of the neck and through the suprascapular notch enters to the supraspinous fossa. Then it comes to the infraspinous fossa via the spinoglenoid notch. The SSN has 3 sensory branches: a medial subacromial branch passes to the suprascapular notch, a lateral subacromial branch and a posterior glenohumeral branch pass the spinoglenoid notch. These branches supplies 70% of the sensory input to the shoulder. In the literature, SSNB through suprascapular notch has positive effect on shoulder functions, pain and range of motion (ROM) in patients in the treatment of chronic shoulder pain. There is no study examining the efficacy of SSNB through spinoglenoid notch in the treatment of chronic shoulder pain.Therefore, the investigators planned this randomized trial to compare of the efficiency and safety of two different SSNB techniques (approach through suprascapular notch versus spinoglenoid notch) in treatment of patients with chronic shoulder pain. Material and methods: Participants: adult patients (>18 year old) with chronic shoulder pain Inclusion criteria: age ≥ 18 years old, shoulder pain that last more than 3 month, patients with a vas value of ≥ 4 despite treatment (drugs used for analgesia, local injections and physiotherapy methods), shoulder pain defined as non-specific shoulder pain, subacromial impingement syndrome, rotator cuff tendinopathy, adhesive capsulitis, non-traumatic instability, superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesion, acromioclavicular pathology, shoulder osteoarthritis. Exclusion criteria: A history of uncontrolled chronic diseases, e.g., malignant neoplasms, blood dyscrasia, previous surgery history at the affected shoulder, shoulder injection in the last 3 months before treatment, cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy, a previous fracture close to the shoulder region, septic arthritis or local infection in the affected shoulder, anaphylaxis against local anesthetics and/or corticosteroids, cardiac pacemaker, pregnancy. Study Design: prospective, double blind, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial Randomization method: 1:1 by computer randomization program Detail of the intervention: Experimental: SSNB through the spinoglenoid notch US guided 1ml methylprednisolone acetate (1ml / 40mg) and 5ml 0.5% bupivacaine Intervention: Medication: corticosteroids and local anesthetics Active comparator: SSNB through the suprascapular notch US guided 1ml methylprednisolone acetate (1ml / 40mg) and 5ml 0.5% bupivacaine Intervention: Medication: corticosteroids and local anesthetics Outcome measurement: Visual analogue scale of pain, active range of motion, shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI), Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT), Patient satisfaction Statistical analyses: Sample size calculation: The sample size was calculated using http://statulator.com/SampleSize/ss2M.html considering a previous study. The non-inferiority margin for SPADI was taken as 9 points. Standard deviation 15.3 (assuming normal distribution) with a power of 80, an error of 0.05 type 1; 36 patients should be enrolled per groups. Including a rate of 10% drop-out 40 patients were planned to enroll in each groups. Continuous variables 1. Student's t test: fit assumption of normal distribution 2. Mann-Whitney test: does not fit the assumption of normal distribution Categorical variables 1. Chi-square test 2. Fisher exact test: sparse data The outcome differences within the experimental and active comparator groups of different time of evaluation will be analysed by using repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post hoc test with Bonferroni method.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 80
Est. completion date June 1, 2022
Est. primary completion date June 1, 2022
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age = 18 years old 2. Shoulder pain that last more than 3 month 3. Patients with a VAS value of = 4 despite treatment (drugs used for analgesia, local injections and physiotherapy methods) 4. Shoulder pain defined as non-specific shoulder pain, subacromial impingement syndrome, rotator cuff tendinopathy, adhesive capsulitis, non-traumatic instability, SLAP lesion, acromioclavicular pathology, and / or shoulder osteoarthritis. Exclusion Criteria: 1. A history of uncontrolled chronic diseases, e.g., malignant neoplasms, blood dyscrasia, and infection 2. Previous surgery history at the affected shoulder 3. Shoulder injection in the last 3 months before treatment 4. The presence of cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy 5. A previous fracture close to the shoulder region 6. Presence of septic arthritis or local infection in the affected shoulder 7. Presence of anaphylaxis against local anesthetics and / or corticosteroids 8. Presence of a cardiac pacemaker 9. Pregnancy

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
US guided, SSNB with 1ml methylprednisolone acetate (1ml / 40mg) and 5 ml 0.5% bupivacaine
nerve block

Locations

Country Name City State
Turkey Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine Hospital Kayseri

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
TC Erciyes University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Turkey, 

References & Publications (6)

Chan CW, Peng PW. Suprascapular nerve block: a narrative review. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011 Jul-Aug;36(4):358-73. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3182204ec0. Review. — View Citation

Chang KV, Hung CY, Wu WT, Han DS, Yang RS, Lin CP. Comparison of the Effectiveness of Suprascapular Nerve Block With Physical Therapy, Placebo, and Intra-Articular Injection in Management of Chronic Shoulder Pain: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Aug;97(8):1366-80. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.11.009. Epub 2015 Dec 14. Review. — View Citation

Laumonerie P, Blasco L, Tibbo ME, Bonnevialle N, Labrousse M, Chaynes P, Mansat P. Sensory innervation of the subacromial bursa by the distal suprascapular nerve: a new description of its anatomic distribution. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Sep;28(9):1788-1794. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.02.016. Epub 2019 Apr 26. — View Citation

Saglam G, Alisar DÇ. A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Versus Landmark-Guided Suprascapular Nerve Block in Chronic Shoulder Pain: A Prospective Randomized Study. Pain Physician. 2020 Nov;23(6):581-588. — View Citation

Shanahan EM, Ahern M, Smith M, Wetherall M, Bresnihan B, FitzGerald O. Suprascapular nerve block (using bupivacaine and methylprednisolone acetate) in chronic shoulder pain. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003 May;62(5):400-6. — View Citation

Vorster W, Lange CP, Briët RJ, Labuschagne BC, du Toit DF, Muller CJ, de Beer JF. The sensory branch distribution of the suprascapular nerve: an anatomic study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 May-Jun;17(3):500-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.10.008. Epub 2008 Feb 11. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Change of Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) Shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI). The SPADI contains 13 items that assess two domains; a 5-item subscale that measures pain and an 8-item subscale that measures disability. Baseline and 1, 4, and 12 weeks after injection
Secondary Change of Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Visual analogue score (VAS) was done at rest and at shoulder movement. VAS was explained to the patients during assessment as 0 equal no pain and 10 equal worst imaginable pain. Baseline and 1, 4, and 12 weeks after injection
Secondary Change of Range of Motion (ROM) Active ROM of the affected shoulder is measured using a goniometer. These measurements included abduction, flexion, internal rotation, and external rotation. Baseline and 1, 4, and 12 weeks after injection
Secondary Change of Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT) In order to determine the pain perception thresholds in the affected shoulder, Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT) values will be calculated by taking three measurements from the middle deltoid, upper trapezius, infraspinatus and tibialis anterior area with an algometer (Commander Echo® Algometer, JTECH Medical, Midvale, UT, USA). The average of the last 2 measurements will be taken and recorded. Baseline and 1, 4, and 12 weeks after injection
Secondary Patient satisfaction Patient satisfaction with the injection is determined by Likert Scale (1= very dissatisfied, 2= dissatisfied, 3=neither dissatisfied or satisfied, 4= satisfied, 5= very satisfied) Baseline and 1, 4, and 12 weeks after injection
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT01289236 - "MILNACIPRAN" in Subjects With Chronic Shoulder Pain Phase 4
Completed NCT05137106 - Assessment of Effectiveness of Dry Needling for Treating Shoulder Pain N/A
Withdrawn NCT05364099 - Suprascapular Nerve Block for Treatment of Shoulder Pain in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injuries Phase 4
Not yet recruiting NCT03739021 - Exparel for Total Shoulder Pain Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT02738372 - Influence of Biopsychosocial Factors and Central Sensitization in Predicting the Recovery of Chronic Shoulder Pain
Not yet recruiting NCT04245969 - Efficacy of 448kilohertz Capacitive Resistive Monopolar Radiofrequency Stimulation in Chronic Shoulder Pain N/A
Completed NCT04316793 - Effects of Dry Needling When Applied to the Infraspinatus Muscle in People With Chronic Shoulder Pain N/A
Completed NCT03000205 - Effects of Hypertonic Dextrose Water Injection for Supraspinatus Tendinosis Patients N/A
Recruiting NCT05754190 - Assessing Symptom and Mood Dynamics in Pain Using the Smartphone Application SOMA
Completed NCT05072899 - Platelet Rich Plasm Versus Hyaluronic Acid Injection in Chronic Painful Shoulder N/A
Recruiting NCT04916353 - Effects of Ultrasound-guide Hypertonic Dextrose Injection for Chronic Subacromial Bursitis N/A
Recruiting NCT05481710 - Nociplastic Pain in Patients With Chronic Shoulder Pain
Completed NCT05829707 - Long-term Outcomes of Breast Cancer Patients After Wound Infiltration Analgesia Phase 4
Completed NCT06135038 - Injection in Patients With Chronic Shoulder Pain N/A
Recruiting NCT04737993 - Pulsed Radiofrequency of Suprascapular Nerve and Shoulder Joint for Chronic Shoulder Pain N/A
Completed NCT03838471 - Cognitive Behavioral Factors and Central Sensitization in Chronic Shoulder Pain
Completed NCT04475965 - The Effectiveness of Isometric Exercise on the Management of Chronic Shoulder Pain N/A
Recruiting NCT04954391 - Pulsed Radiofrequency One or Three Nerves for Chronic Shoulder Pain. A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study N/A
Completed NCT04636528 - Digital Versus Conventional Physical Therapy for Chronic Shoulder Tendinopathy N/A
Terminated NCT04077164 - Chronic Pain, Couples, & Physical Activity