Chronic Radiation Proctitis Clinical Trial
— Thal-CRPOfficial title:
Prospective, Open Clinical Trial of Thalidomide in the Treatment of Chronic Radiation Proctitis With Intractable Bleeding
Chronic radiation proctitis (CRP) is the main secondary toxic injury after pelvic radiotherapy. Hematochezia is the most common symptom for more than 80% of CRP patients. Non-surgical treatment is the first choice to the treatment of CRP to avoid the occurrence of serious complications. Conventional oral medication for the treatment of bleeding CRP is very few and has little effect. At present, no oral medication has been found to significantly alleviate and control refractory bleeding of CRP. Therefore, it is an urgent problem to screen out a drug that is more effective, safe and highly compliant for the treatment of hemorrhagic CRP. Thalidomide has anti-inflammatory, immune regulation, anti-angiogenesis and other effects. For the patients of CRP with intractable bleeding, a prospective, open clinical trial will be carried out to observe the safety and effectiveness of thalidomide in treating hemorrhagic CRP.
Status | Not yet recruiting |
Enrollment | 62 |
Est. completion date | December 30, 2022 |
Est. primary completion date | July 30, 2022 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 75 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion criteria 1. Patients aged 18-75 years; 2. Patients with ECOG physical condition score of 0-2; 3. Patients with previous pathological diagnosis of pelvic tumors (Gynecology, prostate, urinary system); 4. Patients with a history of pelvic radiotherapy, at least 6 months from the end of the last radiotherapy; 5. Patients with no primary tumor recurrence or metastasis; 6. Patients with refractory hemorrhagic CRP who have failed to conventional treatment (SOMA score for hematochezia=2, hemoglobin level =90g/L, or a history of blood transfusion due to CRP) 7. Subjects and their family members can understand the research plan, and are willing to participate, and sign an informed consent form. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patients with active bleeding requiring emergency treatment; 2. Patients with severe complications of CRP, such as Rectal ulcer (VRS>Grade 3) or fistula, perforation, stenosis, necrosis, perianal intractable pain and so on 3. Patients with a history of rectal resection; 4. Other bleeding diseases, such as grade III or IV hemorrhoids, coagulation dysfunction, etc.; 5. Patients with other diseases requiring long-term use of anticoagulant drugs; 6. Combined intestinal obstruction, requiring surgery; 7. The absolute value of neutrophils of patients is lower than 750/mm3; 8. Patients who are allergic to thalidomide; 9. Pregnant or lactating women; 10. Patients with severe mental illness; 11. Patients who cannot take medication or follow up as planned; 12. During the trial and within 3 months after the trial, the subjects and their partners are not willing to contraception; 13. Participants in other clinical investigators 3 months before the trial |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
n/a |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University |
Alberto SF, Felix J, de Deus J. Thalidomide for the treatment of severe intestinal bleeding. Endoscopy. 2008 Sep;40(9):788; author reply 789. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1077513. Epub 2008 Sep 4. — View Citation
Andreyev HJ. Argon plasma coagulation in chronic radiation proctitis: Postgate et al. Endoscopy. 2007 Aug;39(8):751-2; author reply 752. — View Citation
Bauditz J, Schachschal G, Wedel S, Lochs H. Thalidomide for treatment of severe intestinal bleeding. Gut. 2004 Apr;53(4):609-12. — View Citation
Bauditz J, Wedel S, Lochs H. Thalidomide reduces tumour necrosis factor alpha and interleukin 12 production in patients with chronic active Crohn's disease. Gut. 2002 Feb;50(2):196-200. — View Citation
Craanen ME, van Triest B, Verheijen RH, Mulder CJ. Thalidomide in refractory haemorrhagic radiation induced proctitis. Gut. 2006 Sep;55(9):1371-2. — View Citation
Kim KT, Chae HS, Kim JS, Kim HK, Cho YS, Choi W, Choi KY, Rho SY, Kang SJ. Thalidomide effect in endothelial cell of acute radiation proctitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2008 Aug 14;14(30):4779-83. — View Citation
Ma TH, Yuan ZX, Zhong QH, Wang HM, Qin QY, Chen XX, Wang JP, Wang L. Formalin irrigation for hemorrhagic chronic radiation proctitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Mar 28;21(12):3593-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i12.3593. — View Citation
McCrone LF, Neary PM, Larkin J, McCormick P, Mehigan B. The surgical management of radiation proctopathy. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Aug;32(8):1099-1108. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2803-y. Epub 2017 Apr 20. Review. — View Citation
Yuan ZX, Ma TH, Wang HM, Zhong QH, Yu XH, Qin QY, Wang JP, Wang L. Colostomy is a simple and effective procedure for severe chronic radiation proctitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jun 28;22(24):5598-608. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i24.5598. — View Citation
Yuan ZX, Ma TH, Zhong QH, Wang HM, Yu XH, Qin QY, Chu LL, Wang L, Wang JP. Novel and Effective Almagate Enema for Hemorrhagic Chronic Radiation Proctitis and Risk Factors for Fistula Development. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17(2):631-8. — View Citation
Zhou S, Wang F, Hsieh TC, Wu JM, Wu E. Thalidomide-a notorious sedative to a wonder anticancer drug. Curr Med Chem. 2013;20(33):4102-8. Review. — View Citation
* Note: There are 11 references in all — Click here to view all references
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Remission rate of rectal bleeding one month after thalidomide treatment | Remission of rectal bleeding was defined as the score of Subjective Objective Management Analysis system (SOMA) for retcal bleeding at least 1 grade lower and the hemoglobin level at least 10g/L higher than that before treatment. The SOMA score for hematochezia was ranged from 1 to 4, with the higher the score, the more serious. | the first month after thalidomide treatment | |
Secondary | Remission rate of rectal bleeding one month during thalidomide treatment | Remission of rectal bleeding was defined as the score of Subjective Objective Management Analysis system (SOMA) for retcal bleeding at least 1 grade lower and the hemoglobin level at least 10g/L higher than that before treatment. The SOMA score for hematochezia was ranged from 1 to 4, with the higher the score, the more serious. | the first month during thalidomide treatment | |
Secondary | Remission rate of rectal bleeding two months during thalidomide treatment | Remission of rectal bleeding was defined as the score of Subjective Objective Management Analysis system (SOMA) for retcal bleeding at least 1 grade lower and the hemoglobin level at least 10g/L higher than that before treatment. The SOMA score for hematochezia was ranged from 1 to 4, with the higher the score, the more serious. | the second month during thalidomide treatment | |
Secondary | Remission rate of rectal bleeding three months during thalidomide treatment | Remission of rectal bleeding was defined as the score of Subjective Objective Management Analysis system (SOMA) for retcal bleeding at least 1 grade lower and the hemoglobin level at least 10g/L higher than that before treatment. The SOMA score for hematochezia was ranged from 1 to 4, with the higher the score, the more serious. | the third month during thalidomide treatment | |
Secondary | Remission rate of rectal bleeding four months during thalidomide treatment | Remission of rectal bleeding was defined as the score of Subjective Objective Management Analysis system (SOMA) for retcal bleeding at least 1 grade lower and the hemoglobin level at least 10g/L higher than that before treatment. The SOMA score for hematochezia was ranged from 1 to 4, with the higher the score, the more serious. | the fourth month during thalidomide treatment | |
Secondary | Remission rate of rectal bleeding three months after thalidomide treatment | Remission of rectal bleeding was defined as the score of Subjective Objective Management Analysis system (SOMA) for retcal bleeding at least 1 grade lower and the hemoglobin level at least 10g/L higher than that before treatment. The SOMA score for hematochezia was ranged from 1 to 4, with the higher the score, the more serious. | the third month after thalidomide treatment | |
Secondary | Remission rate of rectal bleeding six months after thalidomide treatment | Remission of rectal bleeding was defined as the score of Subjective Objective Management Analysis system (SOMA) for retcal bleeding at least 1 grade lower and the hemoglobin level at least 10g/L higher than that before treatment. The SOMA score for hematochezia was ranged from 1 to 4, with the higher the score, the more serious. | the sixth month after thalidomide treatment | |
Secondary | Endoscopic score one month during thalidomide treatment | Endoscopic score was performed using Vienna rectoscopy Score (VRS). VRS was ranged 1 to 5. A higher score indicated a more severe lesion. | the first month during thalidomide treatment | |
Secondary | Endoscopic score four months during thalidomide treatment | Endoscopic score was performed using Vienna rectoscopy Score (VRS). VRS was ranged 1 to 5. A higher score indicated a more severe lesion. | the fourth month during thalidomide treatment | |
Secondary | Endoscopic score one month after thalidomide treatment | Endoscopic score was performed using Vienna rectoscopy Score (VRS). VRS was ranged 1 to 5. A higher score indicated a more severe lesion. | the first month after thalidomide treatment | |
Secondary | Endoscopic score three months after thalidomide treatment | Endoscopic score was performed using Vienna rectoscopy Score (VRS). VRS was ranged 1 to 5. A higher score indicated a more severe lesion. | the third month after thalidomide treatment | |
Secondary | Endoscopic score six months after thalidomide treatment | Endoscopic score was performed using Vienna rectoscopy Score (VRS). VRS was ranged 1 to 5. A higher score indicated a more severe lesion. | the sixth month after thalidomide treatment | |
Secondary | Quality of life of the patient one month during thalidomide treatment | Quality of life of the patient was evaluated by the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire composed of multi-item scales and single items that reflect the multidimensionality of the quality-of-life. It incorporated five functioning subscales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), nine symptom subscales (pain, fatigue, nausea and vomiting, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, dyspnea, insomnia, financial difficulties), and one global quality of life subscale, and the scores were ranged 0 to 100. Higher scores for functional subscales and global quality of life subscale indicated the better functional status and quality of life. But the higher scores for symptom subscales indicated the poorer quality of life. | the first month during thalidomide treatment | |
Secondary | Quality of life of the patient two months during thalidomide treatment | Quality of life of the patient was evaluated by the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). The EORTC QLQ-C30 was a 30-item questionnaire composed of multi-item scales and single items that reflecting the multidimensionality of the quality-of-life. It incorporated five functioning subscales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), nine symptom subscales (pain, fatigue, nausea and vomiting, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, dyspnea, insomnia, financial difficulties), and one global quality of life subscale, and the scores were ranged 0 to 100. Higher scores for functional subscales and global quality of life subscale indicated the better functional status and quality of life. But the higher scores for symptom subscales indicated the poorer quality of life. | the second month during thalidomide treatment | |
Secondary | Quality of life of the patient three months during thalidomide treatment | Quality of life of the patient was evaluated by the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). The EORTC QLQ-C30 was a 30-item questionnaire composed of multi-item scales and single items that reflecting the multidimensionality of the quality-of-life. It incorporated five functioning subscales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), nine symptom subscales (pain, fatigue, nausea and vomiting, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, dyspnea, insomnia, financial difficulties), and one global quality of life subscale, and the scores were ranged 0 to 100. Higher scores for functional subscales and global quality of life subscale indicated the better functional status and quality of life. But the higher scores for symptom subscales indicated the poorer quality of life. | the third month during thalidomide treatment | |
Secondary | Quality of life of the patient four months during thalidomide treatment | Quality of life of the patient was evaluated by the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). The EORTC QLQ-C30 was a 30-item questionnaire composed of multi-item scales and single items that reflecting the multidimensionality of the quality-of-life. It incorporated five functioning subscales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), nine symptom subscales (pain, fatigue, nausea and vomiting, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, dyspnea, insomnia, financial difficulties), and one global quality of life subscale, and the scores were ranged 0 to 100. Higher scores for functional subscales and global quality of life subscale indicated the better functional status and quality of life. But the higher scores for symptom subscales indicated the poorer quality of life. | the fourth month during thalidomide treatment | |
Secondary | Quality of life of the patient one month after thalidomide treatment | Quality of life of the patient was evaluated by the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). The EORTC QLQ-C30 was a 30-item questionnaire composed of multi-item scales and single items that reflecting the multidimensionality of the quality-of-life. It incorporated five functioning subscales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), nine symptom subscales (pain, fatigue, nausea and vomiting, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, dyspnea, insomnia, financial difficulties), and one global quality of life subscale, and the scores were ranged 0 to 100. Higher scores for functional subscales and global quality of life subscale indicated the better functional status and quality of life. But the higher scores for symptom subscales indicated the poorer quality of life. | the first month after thalidomide treatment | |
Secondary | Quality of life of the patient three months after thalidomide treatment | Quality of life of the patient was evaluated by the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). The EORTC QLQ-C30 was a 30-item questionnaire composed of multi-item scales and single items that reflecting the multidimensionality of the quality-of-life. It incorporated five functioning subscales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), nine symptom subscales (pain, fatigue, nausea and vomiting, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, dyspnea, insomnia, financial difficulties), and one global quality of life subscale, and the scores were ranged 0 to 100. Higher scores for functional subscales and global quality of life subscale indicated the better functional status and quality of life. But the higher scores for symptom subscales indicated the poorer quality of life. | the third month after thalidomide treatment | |
Secondary | Quality of life of the patient six months after thalidomide treatment | Quality of life of the patient was evaluated by the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). The EORTC QLQ-C30 was a 30-item questionnaire composed of multi-item scales and single items that reflecting the multidimensionality of the quality-of-life. It incorporated five functioning subscales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), nine symptom subscales (pain, fatigue, nausea and vomiting, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, dyspnea, insomnia, financial difficulties), and one global quality of life subscale, and the scores were ranged 0 to 100. Higher scores for functional subscales and global quality of life subscale indicated the better functional status and quality of life. But the higher scores for symptom subscales indicated the poorer quality of life. | the sixth month after thalidomide treatment | |
Secondary | Incidence of adverse events four months during thalidomide treatment | Including adverse reactions of thalidomide and other adverse events | the fourth month during thalidomide treatment | |
Secondary | Incidence of adverse events six months after thalidomide treatment | Including adverse reactions of thalidomide and other adverse events | the sixth month after thalidomide treatment |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT06438809 -
Umbilical-Cord-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Injection for Chronic Radiation Proctitis
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01613534 -
Combined Therapy in Radiation Proctopathy
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03397901 -
Transverse Colostomy for Refractory Hemorrhagic Chronic Radiation Proctitis: a Prospective Cohort Study
|
N/A |