Study Assessing Deep Molecular Response in Adult Patients With CML in Chronic Phase Treated With Nilotinib Firstline.

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Clinical Trial

— NILOdeepR  

Official title:

A Phase IV Single Arm, Multicenter, Open-label Study Assessing Deep Molecular Response in Adult Patients With Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome Positive CML in Chronic Phase After Two Years of Treatment With Nilotinib 300mg BID

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT02546674
• Other study ID #: CAMN107ADE20
• Secondary ID: 2015-000968-34
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 4
• Start date: February 18, 2016
• Est. completion date: March 25, 2021

Study information

• Verified date: March 2022
• Source: Novartis
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the rate of deep molecular response (MR4.5) after 24 months of therapy with nilotinib in newly diagnosed patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) using EUTOS (European Treatment and Outcome Study for CML)-standardized laboratories. All participants received nilotinib 300 mg twice daily (BID).

Description:

This was a Phase IV open-label, multi-center, single-arm study in participants with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) CML in chronic phase for who nilotinib is the appropriate treatment at the discretion of the investigator.

A screening period of 2 weeks was used to assess eligibility and to taper participants off disallowed medications. Participants whose eligibility was confirmed entered a 24 months treatment phase with nilotinib 300mg BID. Nilotinib was prescribed by the investigator according to the individual needs of the participants.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 171
• Est. completion date: March 25, 2021
• Est. primary completion date: February 23, 2021
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 120 Years

Eligibility

Key Inclusion Criteria:

• Patients with newly diagnosed (within 6 months) Philadelphia chromosome positive CML in chronic phase

• Patients must be previously untreated for CML with the exception of 6 months treatment with hydroxyurea and a maximum of 6 weeks treatment with imatinib

• Adequate end organ function

• Normal serum levels = lower limit of normal (LLN) of potassium, magnesium, total calcium corrected for serum albumin or phosphorus, or correctable to within normal limits with supplements, prior to the first dose of study medication.

Key Exclusion Criteria:

• Known impaired cardiac function like long QT syndrome, history of myocardial infarction or unstable angina in the past 12 months.

• Patients who are pregnant or breast feeding.

Other inclusion/exclusion criteria might apply

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
• Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive
• Leukemia, Myeloid

Intervention

Drug:
• Nilotinib
A daily dose of 300 mg was given to all participants as two 150 mg capsules BID. The prescription of study drug was not study dependent and followed medical needs of the participant only. The study treatment was administered for 24 months.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Aschaffenburg
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Augsburg
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Bad Mergentheim
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Bad Reichenhall
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Bad Saarow
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Bad Soden
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Bamberg
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Bayreuth
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Berlin
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Berlin
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Berlin
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Berlin
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Berlin
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Biberach
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Bremerhaven
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Chemnitz
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Donauwoerth
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Dresden
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Duesseldorf
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Duesseldorf
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Erfurt
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Essen
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Essen
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Georgsmarienhuette
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Giessen
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Göppingen
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Goslar
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Halberstadt
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Halle
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Halle S
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Hannover
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Hannover
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Heidelberg
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Heidelberg
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Herne	Nordrhein-Westfalen
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Jena
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Kassel
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Kiel
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Koeln
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Leipzig
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Luebeck	Schleswig-holstein
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Magdeburg
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Mannheim	Baden-Wuerttemberg
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Memmingen
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Minden
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Moers
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Muelheim
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Muenchen
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Muenster
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Mutlangen
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Nuernberg
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Nuernberg
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Oldenburg
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Paderborn
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Passau
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Potsdam
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Rostock
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Rotenburg
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Saarbruecken
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Schorndorf
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Schwäbisch-Hall
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Schweinfurt
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Tübingen
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Velbert
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Westerstede
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Wiesbaden
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Wilhelmshaven
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Wolfsburg
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Worms
Germany	Novartis Investigative Site	Wuerzburg

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Germany, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Percentage of Participants With Deep Molecular Response MR4.5 at 24 Months of Study Treatment	Percentage of participants who were in deep molecular response MR4.5 (IS) at 24 months measured in a standardized EUTOS (European Treatment and Outcome Study for CML) MR4.5 laboratory. MR4.5 was defined as either (i) detectable disease = 0.0032% BCR-ABL (fusion gene from breakpoint cluster region and Abelson genes) (IS) or (ii) undetectable disease in cDNA with 32000-99999 ABL1 transcripts or 77000-239999 glucuronidase beta (GUSB) transcripts.; Responders: Participants with a MR4.5 at 24 months, or if the assessment at this time point was missing, with a MR4.5 at 21 months Non-responders: Participants dropping out early or not providing sufficient data for any other reason. Participants who achieved MR4.5 before 24 months, but was no longer in MR4.5 at 24 months or progressed (or was no longer in MR4.5 at 21 months if evaluation at 24 months was missing).; Confidence intervals were calculated based on the Exact Clopper-Pearson method.	Month 24 and Month 21 (if assessment at Month 24 was missing)
Secondary	Percentage of Participants With MR4 at 24 Months of Study Treatment.	Percentage of participants with MR4 at 24 months of study treatment. MR4 (IS) is defined as either (i) detectable disease =0.01% BCR-ABL by IS or (ii) undetectable disease in cDNA with 10000 - 31999 ABL1 transcripts or 24000 - 76999 GUSB transcripts.; Confidence intervals were calculated based on the Exact Clopper-Pearson method.	Month 24
Secondary	Percentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR) at 12 Months of Study Treatment	Percentage of participants with MMR at 12 months of study treatment. MMR is defined as = 0.1% BCR-ABL by IS, or equivalent to = 3 log reduction of BCR-ABL transcript from standardized baseline.; Confidence intervals were calculated based on the Exact Clopper-Pearson method.	Month 12
Secondary	Percentage of Participants With Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) at 6 Months of Study Treatment	Percentage of participants with CCyR at 6 months of study treatment. Cytogenetic response was assessed as the percentage of Philadelphia positive (Ph+) metaphases in the bone marrow (a review of a minimum of 20 metaphases was required). CCyR was defined as a value of 0% Ph+ metaphases in bone marrow.; Confidence intervals were calculated based on the Exact Clopper-Pearson method.	Month 6
Secondary	Progression-free Survival	Progression-free survival is defined as the time from the date of start of study treatment to the date of the first documented disease progression to accelerated phase (AP)/ blast crisis (BC) or death from any cause, whichever is earlier.; AP is defined as: 15% blasts in the peripheral blood or one marrow aspirate, but <30% blasts in both the peripheral blood and bone marrow aspirate; 30% blasts plus promyelocytes in peripheral blood or bone marrow aspirate; 20% basophils in the peripheral blood or bone marrow Thrombocytopenia (<100 x 109/Liter) that is unrelated to therapy Evidence of clonal evolution; BC is defined as: = 30% blasts in peripheral blood or bone marrow aspirate Appearance of extramedullary involvement other than hepatosplenomegaly proven by biopsy (i.e., chloroma)	From date of start of treatment to first documented disease progression to AP/ BC or death, assessed up to 24 months
Secondary	Time to Progression to AP/BC	Time to progression to AP/BC is defined as the time from the date of start of study treatment to the date of earliest transformation to AP/BC, or CML-related death.; AP is defined as: 15% blasts in the peripheral blood or one marrow aspirate, but <30% blasts in both the peripheral blood and bone marrow aspirate; 30% blasts plus promyelocytes in peripheral blood or bone marrow aspirate; 20% basophils in the peripheral blood or bone marrow Thrombocytopenia (<100 x 109/L) that is unrelated to therapy Evidence of clonal evolution (with consensus of SC only); BC is defined as: = 30% blasts in peripheral blood or bone marrow aspirate Appearance of extramedullary involvement other than hepatosplenomegaly proven by biopsy (i.e., chloroma)	From the date of start of study treatment to the date of earliest transformation to AP/BC or CML-related death, assessed up to 24 months
Secondary	Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status (GHS)/Quality of Life (QoL)	The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a patient completed 30 item questionnaire that is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, six single items and a GHS/QoL scale.; The GHS/QoL scale has 7 possible scores of responses (1=very poor to 7=excellent). Scores were averaged and transformed to 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better quality of life.; A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.	Baseline, month 3, month 6, month 12, month 18 and month 24
Secondary	Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30): Physical Functioning	The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a patient completed 30 item questionnaire that is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, six single items and a global health status/QoL scale.; For the physical functioning scale, participants self-rated levels of difficulty in doing strenuous activities, taking a walk, how much they needed to stay in bed or a chair, or needed help with eating, dressing, bathing, using the toilet. The physical functioning scale had 4 possible scores (1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Scores were averaged and transformed to 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better functioning. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement in physical functioning.	Baseline, month 3, month 6, month 12, month 18 and month 24
Secondary	Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30): Role Functioning	The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a patient completed 30 item questionnaire that is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, six single items and a global health status/QoL scale.; For the role functioning scale, participants self-rated how much they were limited in doing work or daily activities, or in pursuing hobbies or other leisure time activities during the past week. The role functioning scale had 4 possible scores (1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Scores were averaged and transformed to 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better functioning. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement in role functioning.	Baseline, month 3, month 6, month 12, month 18 and month 24
Secondary	Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30): Emotional Functioning	The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a patient completed 30 item questionnaire that is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, six single items and a global health status/QoL scale.; For the emotional functioning scale, participants self-rated how much they felt tense, worried, irritable or depressed during the past week. The emotional functioning scale had 4 possible scores (1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Scores were averaged and transformed to 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better functioning. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement in emotional functioning.	Baseline, month 3, month 6, month 12, month 18 and month 24
Secondary	Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30): Cognitive Functioning	The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a patient completed 30 item questionnaire that is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, six single items and a global health status/QoL scale.; For the cognitive functioning scale, participants self-rated the extent of difficulty in concentrating on things or remembering things during the past week. The cognitive functioning scale had 4 possible scores (1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Scores were averaged and transformed to 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better functioning. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement in cognitive functioning.	Baseline, month 3, month 6, month 12, month 18 and month 24
Secondary	Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30): Social Functioning	The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a patient completed 30 item questionnaire that is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, six single items and a global health status/QoL scale.; For the social functioning scale, participants self-rated how much their physical condition or medical treatment interfered with their family life and social activities during the past week. The social functioning scale had 4 possible scores (1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Scores were averaged and transformed to 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better functioning. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement in social functioning.	Baseline, month 3, month 6, month 12, month 18 and month 24
Secondary	Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Specific 24 (EORTC QLQ-CML 24): Symptom Burden	The EORTC QLQ-CML 24 is an internationally developed disease specific health-related quality of life questionnaire for CML patients. The questionnaire is composed of four multi-item scales and two single-item scales. The module consists of 24 items assessing symptoms burden (13 items), impact on worry/mood (4 items), impact on daily life (3 items), satisfaction with care and information (2 items) body image problems (1 item) and satisfaction with social life (1 item). The items were measured on four levels: 1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much. For each domain, scores were averaged and transformed to 0 to 100. A higher score in symptom burden domain indicates a worse outcome. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.	Baseline, month 3, month 6, month 12, month 18 and month 24
Secondary	Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Specific 24 (EORTC QLQ-CML 24): Impact on Worry/Mood	The EORTC QLQ-CML 24 is an internationally developed disease specific health-related quality of life questionnaire for CML patients. The questionnaire is composed of four multi-item scales and two single-item scales. The module consists of 24 items assessing symptoms burden (13 items), impact on worry/mood (4 items), impact on daily life (3 items), satisfaction with care and information (2 items) body image problems (1 item) and satisfaction with social life (1 item). The items were measured on four levels: 1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much. For each scale, scores were averaged and transformed to 0 to 100. A higher score in impact on worry/mood domain indicates a worse outcome. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.	Baseline, month 3, month 6, month 12, month 18 and month 24
Secondary	Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Specific 24 (EORTC QLQ-CML 24): Impact on Daily Life	The EORTC QLQ-CML 24 is an internationally developed disease specific health-related quality of life questionnaire for CML patients. The questionnaire is composed of four multi-item scales and two single-item scales. The module consists of 24 items assessing symptoms burden (13 items), impact on worry/mood (4 items), impact on daily life (3 items), satisfaction with care and information (2 items) body image problems (1 item) and satisfaction with social life (1 item). The items were measured on four levels: 1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much. For each domain, scores were averaged and transformed to 0 to 100. A higher score in impact on daily life domain indicates a worse outcome. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.	Baseline, month 3, month 6, month 12, month 18 and month 24
Secondary	Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Specific 24 (EORTC QLQ-CML 24): Satisfaction With Care and Information	The EORTC QLQ-CML 24 is an internationally developed disease specific health-related quality of life questionnaire for CML patients. The questionnaire is composed of four multi-item scales and two single-item scales. The module consists of 24 items assessing symptoms burden (13 items), impact on worry/mood (4 items), impact on daily life (3 items), satisfaction with care and information (2 items) body image problems (1 item) and satisfaction with social life (1 item). The items were measured on four levels: 1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much. For each domain, scores were averaged and transformed to 0 to 100. A higher score in satisfaction with care and information domain indicates a higher level of satisfaction. A positive change from baseline indicates increasing satisfaction.	Baseline, month 3, month 6, month 12, month 18 and month 24
Secondary	Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Specific 24 (EORTC QLQ-CML 24): Body Image Problems	The EORTC QLQ-CML 24 is an internationally developed disease specific health-related quality of life questionnaire for CML patients. The questionnaire is composed of four multi-item scales and two single-item scales. The module consists of 24 items assessing symptoms burden (13 items), impact on worry/mood (4 items), impact on daily life (3 items), satisfaction with care and information (2 items) body image problems (1 item) and satisfaction with social life (1 item). The items were measured on four levels: 1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much. For each domain, scores were averaged and transformed to 0 to 100. A higher score in body image problems domain indicates a worse outcome. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.	Baseline, month 3, month 6, month 12, month 18 and month 24
Secondary	Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Specific 24 (EORTC QLQ-CML 24): Satisfaction With Social Life	The EORTC QLQ-CML 24 is an internationally developed disease specific health-related quality of life questionnaire for CML patients. The questionnaire is composed of four multi-item scales and two single-item scales. The module consists of 24 items assessing symptoms burden (13 items), impact on worry/mood (4 items), impact on daily life (3 items), satisfaction with care and information (2 items) body image problems (1 item) and satisfaction with social life (1 item). The items were measured on four levels: 1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much. For each domain, scores were averaged and transformed to 0 to 100. A higher score in satisfaction with social life domain indicates a higher level of satisfaction. A positive change from baseline indicates increasing satisfaction.	Baseline, month 3, month 6, month 12, month 18 and month 24

External Links

•   Related Info