Osteopathic Manipulative Techniques for the Treatment of Chronic Migraine Headaches

Chronic Migraine, Headache Clinical Trial

— SMART-CM  

Official title:

Osteopathic Manipulative Techniques for the Treatment of Chronic Migraine Headaches

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Terminated

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT04520425
• Other study ID #: 00014287
• Status: Terminated
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: September 8, 2022
• Est. completion date: June 30, 2023

Study information

• Verified date: August 2023
• Source: Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study evaluates a standardized osteopathic manipulative therapy (OMT) as a treatment for chronic migraine headaches. It will determine the feasibility of enrolling patients in standardized osteopathic manipulative therapy trials, the acceptability of this specific treatment to patients, and evaluate its preliminary effectiveness.

Description:

In the United States, 12% of adults suffer from migraines. Migraines are categorized as episodic or chronic (CM). CM is less common than episodic, with a prevalence of 2%, but far more debilitating, with three times the annual per capita cost, putting the total U.S. direct and indirect cost estimate of CM at $15.5 billion dollars per year. Compared to patients with episodic migraine, those with CM have a lower quality of life (QoL) and higher utilization of primary and emergency care. CM has only two prophylactic pharmacologic treatment options with efficacy demonstrated through randomized, placebo-controlled trials. One is Topiramate, whose side effects, including fatigue, dizziness, mood changes and suicidal ideation, can compromise patients' QoL and adherence rate to this treatment, which has been estimated as under 25%. The other is onabotulinumtoxinA, whose side effects, including neck pain, eyelid ptosis and worsening headaches, are reported in over 25% of users. Due to these high frequency, debilitating side effects, ¬there is an urgent need to develop effective CM treatments with low side-effect profiles. Osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) has been reported to improve episodic and CM symptoms without major side effects. Improvements with OMT include decreased Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) scores, fewer headache days per month and decreased medication use. While promising, these studies have significant limitations, such as small sample sizes and high risk of bias. Further, even higher quality OMT studies rely on the treating physician to select from among several OMT treatment techniques, rather than using a standardized treatment procedure. Together, these limitations led the most recent literature assessment to conclude that, "more study is needed before manipulative therapies can be confidently recommended to prevent and treat headaches." To overcome these limitations, OMT studies for the treatment of CM should apply rigorous methods, including standardized treatment procedures. The investigators have developed a standardized OMT procedure to treat CM. The procedure is repeated every two weeks over a ten week period. Over the past five years it has been successfully used to treat 50 patients with CM in a single family physician's practice. Among the treated patients, 40 reported improved symptoms, and none reported adverse side effects. However, the procedure has not been formally evaluated using rigorous research methods. The specific objectives of this pilot study are to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the standardized OMT procedure for CM, and gather preliminary data on its potential efficacy when implemented in a primary care setting. The central hypothesis is that the standardized myofascial release OMT procedure will improve symptoms of CM as measured by improvement in HIT-6, Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS), Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (MSQ), and self-reported and electronic health record (EHR) medication usage and healthcare utilization. This hypothesis is supported by the investigators' anecdotal clinical success using this approach. The specific aims of this study are: Aim 1: Assess the feasibility of systematically identifying and treating patients with the standardized OMT procedure within the Penn State Health medical system. Feasibility will be measured by the investigators' ability to identify and enroll CM patients in this study. The investigators will enroll 20-40 adult patients with CM who do not have common confounders. This data will inform the recruitment strategy of a future randomized clinical trial (RCT). Aim 2: Assess the acceptability of the standardized OMT procedure. Acceptability will be measured by patient-reported satisfaction and perceived benefit, completion rate and adverse events or side-effects. This data will inform the sample size calculation of a future RCT. Aim 3: Assess the preliminary effectiveness of the standardized OMT procedure. Efficacy will be measured by improvement in HIT-6, MIDAS, and MSQ scores; patient-reported headache frequency, medication usage, and healthcare utilization surveys; and medication and healthcare utilization documented in the EHR. This data will provide estimates of effect size to better inform the sample size calculation of a future RCT.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Terminated
• Enrollment: 11
• Est. completion date: June 30, 2023
• Est. primary completion date: January 30, 2023
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 60 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

To be included in this study patients must be:

1. An adult = 18 years of age and = 60 years of age

2. Enrolled for care at Penn State Hershey Family and Community Medicine as demonstrated by at least one primary care visit within the past 3 years

3. Diagnosed with chronic migraine (as defined by the International Headache Society:

"Headache occurring on 15 or more days/month for more than 3 months, which, on at least 8 days/month, has the features of migraine headache"

4. Legally and physically able to consent in English

5. Willing and able to complete seven in-person visits, each approximately 30 minutes in length, over the course of 21 weeks. Exclusion Criteria:

Patients will be ineligible to participate in this study if they:

1. Are diagnosed with secondary headache

2. Are pregnant (as reported at the time of enrollment; no pregnancy test is required; patients who become pregnant during the study will be withdrawn from the study. (However, they may continue to receive non-study related OMT treatments through their primary care provider as OMT has been shown to be safe in pregnancy.))

3. Are less than 18 or more than 60 years of age

4. Are diagnosed with fibromyalgia.

5. Have current or prior migraine or other headache treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox®)

6. Have received any treatment of neck or head with onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox®) within the past year

7. Have current or prior (within 12 months) treatment for any condition with Topiramate

8. Are determined by the physician administering OMT to have a medical condition, history, or medication that is likely to decrease the efficacy or increase the risk of OMT. Not all patients with the following conditions will be excluded, but some patients with any of the following may be determined to be unlikely to benefit from OMT or at increased risk of OMT, and will be excluded.

1. A history of surgery in the head or neck (except for: uncomplicated dental surgery that is more than 2 years prior and required no significant implantation (i.e., routine wisdom tooth extraction, braces, or root canal))

2. Unstable mental health disorders

3. Chronic chronic inflammatory disorders, severe osteoporosis, tumors, evidence of central nervous system pathology include facial palsy, abnormality in vision, speech or balance, paresthesia, or weakness

4. Have had previous osteopathic treatment for migraine or other headache

5. Have current or past substance abuse disorder

6. Have current or pending disability payments, applications for disability or litigation for disability.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Chronic Migraine, Headache
• Headache
• Migraine Disorders

Intervention

Procedure:
• Osteopathic manipulative therapy
Mandibular: the clinician applies gentle pressure bilaterally to the subject's mandible, in the direction of the patient's clavicles. Frontal: the clinician applies gentle pressure bilaterally to the subject's forehead, in a direction halfway between the parietals and ears. Temporal: the clinician applies gentle pressure bilaterally to the subject's temples, in the direction of the patient's occiput. Parietal: the clinician applies gentle pressure bilaterally to the subject's parietal bones, in the direction of the patient's occipital atlanto joint. Occipital: the clinician applies gentle pressure to the subject's occipital bone, in the direction of the patient's neck.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	Penn State College of Medicine	Hershey	Pennsylvania

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (27)

Bigal ME, Serrano D, Reed M, Lipton RB. Chronic migraine in the population: burden, diagnosis, and satisfaction with treatment. Neurology. 2008 Aug 19;71(8):559-66. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000323925.29520.e7. — View Citation

Bonafede M, Sapra S, Shah N, Tepper S, Cappell K, Desai P. Direct and Indirect Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs Among Migraine Patients in the United States. Headache. 2018 May;58(5):700-714. doi: 10.1111/head.13275. Epub 2018 Feb 15. — View Citation

Burch RC, Buse DC, Lipton RB. Migraine: Epidemiology, Burden, and Comorbidity. Neurol Clin. 2019 Nov;37(4):631-649. doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2019.06.001. Epub 2019 Aug 27. — View Citation

Cerritelli F, Ginevri L, Messi G, Caprari E, Di Vincenzo M, Renzetti C, Cozzolino V, Barlafante G, Foschi N, Provinciali L. Clinical effectiveness of osteopathic treatment in chronic migraine: 3-Armed randomized controlled trial. Complement Ther Med. 2015 Apr;23(2):149-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2015.01.011. Epub 2015 Jan 21. — View Citation

Chaibi A, Benth JS, Tuchin PJ, Russell MB. Chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy for migraine: a three-armed, single-blinded, placebo, randomized controlled trial. Eur J Neurol. 2017 Jan;24(1):143-153. doi: 10.1111/ene.13166. Epub 2016 Oct 2. — View Citation

Chaibi A, Tuchin PJ, Russell MB. Manual therapies for migraine: a systematic review. J Headache Pain. 2011 Apr;12(2):127-33. doi: 10.1007/s10194-011-0296-6. Epub 2011 Feb 5. — View Citation

Chiang CC, Starling AJ. OnabotulinumtoxinA in the treatment of patients with chronic migraine: clinical evidence and experience. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2017 Dec;10(12):397-406. doi: 10.1177/1756285617731521. Epub 2017 Sep 20. — View Citation

Coeytaux RR, Kaufman JS, Chao R, Mann JD, Devellis RF. Four methods of estimating the minimal important difference score were compared to establish a clinically significant change in Headache Impact Test. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Apr;59(4):374-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.05.010. — View Citation

Cole JC, Lin P, Rupnow MF. Minimal important differences in the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) version. Cephalalgia. 2009 Nov;29(11):1180-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2009.01852.x. — View Citation

Diener HC, Solbach K, Holle D, Gaul C. Integrated care for chronic migraine patients: epidemiology, burden, diagnosis and treatment options. Clin Med (Lond). 2015 Aug;15(4):344-50. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.15-4-344. — View Citation

GBD 2016 Headache Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of migraine and tension-type headache, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2018 Nov;17(11):954-976. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30322-3. Erratum In: Lancet Neurol. 2021 Dec;20(12):e7. — View Citation

Hammond NG, Stinchcombe A. Health Behaviors and Social Determinants of Migraine in a Canadian Population-Based Sample of Adults Aged 45-85 Years: Findings From the CLSA. Headache. 2019 Oct;59(9):1547-1564. doi: 10.1111/head.13610. Epub 2019 Aug 2. — View Citation

Hayes NM, Bezilla TA. Incidence of iatrogenesis associated with osteopathic manipulative treatment of pediatric patients. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2006 Oct;106(10):605-8. — View Citation

Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. 2018 Jan;38(1):1-211. doi: 10.1177/0333102417738202. No abstract available. — View Citation

Hensel KL, Carnes MS, Stoll ST. Pregnancy Research on Osteopathic Manipulation Optimizing Treatment Effects: The PROMOTE Study Protocol. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2016 Nov 1;116(11):716-724. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2016.142. — View Citation

Jensen R, Tassorelli C, Rossi P, Allena M, Osipova V, Steiner T, Sandrini G, Olesen J, Nappi G; Basic Diagnostic Headache Diary Study Group. A basic diagnostic headache diary (BDHD) is well accepted and useful in the diagnosis of headache. a multicentre European and Latin American study. Cephalalgia. 2011 Nov;31(15):1549-60. doi: 10.1177/0333102411424212. Epub 2011 Oct 21. — View Citation

Messali A, Sanderson JC, Blumenfeld AM, Goadsby PJ, Buse DC, Varon SF, Stokes M, Lipton RB. Direct and Indirect Costs of Chronic and Episodic Migraine in the United States: A Web-Based Survey. Headache. 2016 Feb;56(2):306-22. doi: 10.1111/head.12755. Epub 2016 Feb 1. — View Citation

Odell J, Clark C, Hunnisett A, Ahmed OH, Branney J. Manual therapy for chronic migraine: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial study protocol. Chiropr Man Therap. 2019 Mar 27;27:11. doi: 10.1186/s12998-019-0232-4. eCollection 2019. — View Citation

Park PW, Dryer RD, Hegeman-Dingle R, Mardekian J, Zlateva G, Wolff GG, Lamerato LE. Cost Burden of Chronic Pain Patients in a Large Integrated Delivery System in the United States. Pain Pract. 2016 Nov;16(8):1001-1011. doi: 10.1111/papr.12357. Epub 2015 Oct 7. — View Citation

Rendas-Baum R, Bloudek LM, Maglinte GA, Varon SF. The psychometric properties of the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire version 2.1 (MSQ) in chronic migraine patients. Qual Life Res. 2013 Jun;22(5):1123-33. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0230-7. Epub 2012 Jul 15. — View Citation

Rendas-Baum R, Yang M, Varon SF, Bloudek LM, DeGryse RE, Kosinski M. Validation of the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) in patients with chronic migraine. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Aug 1;12:117. doi: 10.1186/s12955-014-0117-0. — View Citation

Silberstein SD. Topiramate in Migraine Prevention: A 2016 Perspective. Headache. 2017 Jan;57(1):165-178. doi: 10.1111/head.12997. Epub 2016 Nov 30. — View Citation

Smith MS, Olivas J, Smith K. Manipulative Therapies: What Works. Am Fam Physician. 2019 Feb 15;99(4):248-252. — View Citation

Stevinson C, Ernst E. Risks associated with spinal manipulation. Am J Med. 2002 May;112(7):566-71. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(02)01068-9. — View Citation

Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Dowson AJ, Sawyer J. Development and testing of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Questionnaire to assess headache-related disability. Neurology. 2001;56(6 Suppl 1):S20-8. doi: 10.1212/wnl.56.suppl_1.s20. — View Citation

Voigt K, Liebnitzky J, Burmeister U, Sihvonen-Riemenschneider H, Beck M, Voigt R, Bergmann A. Efficacy of osteopathic manipulative treatment of female patients with migraine: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Altern Complement Med. 2011 Mar;17(3):225-30. doi: 10.1089/acm.2009.0673. Epub 2011 Mar 8. — View Citation

Yang M, Rendas-Baum R, Varon SF, Kosinski M. Validation of the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) across episodic and chronic migraine. Cephalalgia. 2011 Feb;31(3):357-67. doi: 10.1177/0333102410379890. Epub 2010 Sep 6. — View Citation

* Note: There are 27 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Recruitment metrics	Number of eligible patients identified through electronic medical record search, number of contacts needed to schedule an appointment, number of consent meetings to enroll a patient, number of patients who complete the study	6 months
Primary	Treatment satisfaction, first treatment	5 point Likert-type scale assessing: treatment satisfaction on the day of treatment and likelihood of continuing treatments.	1st treatment, week 12
Primary	Treatment satisfaction, second treatment	5 point Likert-type scale assessing: treatment satisfaction on the day of treatment, likelihood of continuing treatments, and (for treatments 2-5) how helpful the treatments have been overall in managing the subjects' chronic migraine	2nd treatment, week 14
Primary	Treatment satisfaction, second treatment	5 point Likert-type scale assessing: treatment satisfaction on the day of treatment, likelihood of continuing treatments, and (for treatments 2-5) how helpful the treatments have been overall in managing the subjects' chronic migraine	3rd treatment, week 16
Primary	Treatment satisfaction, second treatment	5 point Likert-type scale assessing: treatment satisfaction on the day of treatment, likelihood of continuing treatments, and (for treatments 2-5) how helpful the treatments have been overall in managing the subjects' chronic migraine	4th treatment, week 18
Primary	Treatment satisfaction, second treatment	5 point Likert-type scale assessing: treatment satisfaction on the day of treatment, likelihood of continuing treatments, and (for treatments 2-5) how helpful the treatments have been overall in managing the subjects' chronic migraine	5th treatment, week 20
Secondary	Headache impact test (HIT-6)	A validated method of measuring headache morbidity	1st treatment, week 12
Secondary	Headache impact test (HIT-6)	A validated method of measuring headache morbidity	1 month post-intervention, week 24
Secondary	Headache impact test (HIT-6)	A validated method of measuring headache morbidity	3 months post-intervention, week 36
Secondary	MIDAS (Migraine Disability Assessment Test)	A validated method of measuring headache morbidity	1st treatment, week 12
Secondary	MIDAS (Migraine Disability Assessment Test)	A validated method of measuring headache morbidity	3 months post-intervention, week 36
Secondary	MSQ (Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire Version 2.1)	A validated method of measuring headache morbidity	1st treatment, week 12
Secondary	MSQ (Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire Version 2.1)	A validated method of measuring headache morbidity	1 month post-intervention, week 24
Secondary	MSQ (Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire Version 2.1)	A validated method of measuring headache morbidity	3 months post-intervention, week 36
Secondary	Headache Diary	A validated self-assessment method of measuring headache morbidity	2nd treatment, week 14
Secondary	Headache Diary	A validated self-assessment method of measuring headache morbidity	3rd treatment, week 16
Secondary	Headache Diary	A validated self-assessment method of measuring headache morbidity	4th treatment, week 18
Secondary	Headache Diary	A validated self-assessment method of measuring headache morbidity	5th treatment, week 20
Secondary	Headache Diary	A validated self-assessment method of measuring headache morbidity	1 month post-intervention, week 24
Secondary	Headache Diary	A validated self-assessment method of measuring headache morbidity	3 months post-intervention, week 36
Secondary	Medication Use	A measurement of total type and amount of medication used to manage migraines, obtained from patient reports on their Headache Diary and from the electronic medical record at the end of the study.	3 months post-intervention from electronic health record, week 36
Secondary	Healthcare Utilization	A measurement of the total type and number of healthcare visits as self reported in the Headache Diary and extracted from the electronic health record at the end of the study.	3 months post-intervention from electronic health record, week 36