Cervicothoracic Junction Mobilization Versus Muscle Energy Technique in

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

Clinical Trial Summary

This study will be conducted to identify the difference between the effect of of cervicothoracic junction mobilization and autogenic Muscle Energy Technique. on neck pain, cervical range of motion, cervical proprioception and neck disability in mechanical neck pain patients with cervicothoracic junction hypomobility.

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Completed	`NCT05600647` - Magnetic Therapy Versus Exercise Therapy in Old Patients With Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05845853` - Scapular Motor Control for Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain	N/A
Completed	`NCT04777890` - Effects of Instrumental and Manipulative Techniques for the Suboccipital Region in Subjects With Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain	N/A
Completed	`NCT01772966` - Chiropractic Manual Therapy and Neck Pain	N/A

NCT number	NCT05557747
Study type	Interventional
Source	Cairo University
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase	N/A
Start date	November 1, 2022
Completion date	July 30, 2023

Cervicothoracic Junction Mobilization Versus Muscle Energy Technique in Chronic Neck Pain

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms