Chronic Lower Back Pain Clinical Trial
Official title:
Efficacy of Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine (OMM) and Phototherapy for Patients With Chronic Lower Back Pain
NCT number | NCT01765777 |
Other study ID # | BHS-740 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Recruiting |
Phase | N/A |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | June 2011 |
Est. completion date | December 31, 2025 |
The purpose of the research study entitled "Efficacy of Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine (OMM) and Phototherapy for Patients with Chronic Lower Back Pain" is to investigate the hypothesis that combined treatment with both osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM) and phototherapy will provide greater pain relief for patients with chronic lower back pain, as compared with standard medical management or either treatment alone.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 48 |
Est. completion date | December 31, 2025 |
Est. primary completion date | December 31, 2025 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 65 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Age range: 18 - 65 years old - Subjects with constant or intermittent nonspecific lower back pain for a minimum of three (3) months duration. Exclusion Criteria: - Prospective subjects with a diagnosis of the following potential underlying causes of lower back pain: ankylosing spondylitis, cancer or a history of a histologically demonstrated malignant carcinoma, cauda equine syndrome, herniated disc, spinal fracture, or spinal osteomyelitis. - Prospective subjects who have undergone surgery of the lower back in the preceding three (3) months. - Prospective subjects who have received worker's compensation in the preceding three (3) months, or are involved in litigation involving concerns of lower back. - Prospective subjects who are pregnant. - Prospective subjects who have been a patient receiving any osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM) treatment at the clinical trial site in the previous three (3) months, or on greater than three (3) occasions in the preceding year. - Prospective subjects who have ever been an employee at the clinical trial site. - Prospective subjects who have received spinal manipulation in the previous three (3) months, or on greater than three (3) occasions in the preceding year. - Prospective subjects who are currently involved in a physical therapy rehabilitation program. - Prospective subjects who have photosensitivity. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | New York Institute of Technology | Old Westbury | New York |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
New York Institute of Technology |
United States,
Andersson GB, Lucente T, Davis AM, Kappler RE, Lipton JA, Leurgans S. A comparison of osteopathic spinal manipulation with standard care for patients with low back pain. N Engl J Med. 1999 Nov 4;341(19):1426-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199911043411903. — View Citation
Burton AK, McClune TD, Clarke RD, Main CJ. Long-term follow-up of patients with low back pain attending for manipulative care: outcomes and predictors. Man Ther. 2004 Feb;9(1):30-5. doi: 10.1016/s1356-689x(03)00052-3. — View Citation
Cameron, Michelle H., Physical Agents in Rehabilitation: From Research to Practice, Third Edition, Chapter 12, Electromagnetic Radiation: Lasers and Light, Saunders Elsevier, 2009.
Djavid GE, Mehrdad R, Ghasemi M, Hasan-Zadeh H, Sotoodeh-Manesh A, Pouryaghoub G. In chronic low back pain, low level laser therapy combined with exercise is more beneficial than exercise alone in the long term: a randomised trial. Aust J Physiother. 2007;53(3):155-60. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(07)70022-3. Erratum In: Aust J Physiother. 2007;53(4):216. — View Citation
Ferreira ML, Ferreira PH, Latimer J, Herbert RD, Hodges PW, Jennings MD, Maher CG, Refshauge KM. Comparison of general exercise, motor control exercise and spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low back pain: A randomized trial. Pain. 2007 Sep;131(1-2):31-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.12.008. Epub 2007 Jan 23. — View Citation
Fulop AM, Dhimmer S, Deluca JR, Johanson DD, Lenz RV, Patel KB, Douris PC, Enwemeka CS. A meta-analysis of the efficacy of laser phototherapy on pain relief. Clin J Pain. 2010 Oct;26(8):729-36. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181f09713. — View Citation
Fulop AM, Dhimmer S, Deluca JR, Johanson DD, Lenz RV, Patel KB, Douris PC, Enwemeka CS. A meta-analysis of the efficacy of phototherapy in tissue repair. Photomed Laser Surg. 2009 Oct;27(5):695-702. doi: 10.1089/pho.2009.2550. — View Citation
Gamber R, Holland S, Russo DP, Cruser dA, Hilsenrath PE. Cost-effective osteopathic manipulative medicine: a literature review of cost-effectiveness analyses for osteopathic manipulative treatment. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2005 Aug;105(8):357-67. — View Citation
Gur A, Karakoc M, Cevik R, Nas K, Sarac AJ, Karakoc M. Efficacy of low power laser therapy and exercise on pain and functions in chronic low back pain. Lasers Surg Med. 2003;32(3):233-8. doi: 10.1002/lsm.10134. — View Citation
Harvey E, Burton AK, Moffett JK, Breen A; UK BEAM trial team. Spinal manipulation for low-back pain: a treatment package agreed to by the UK chiropractic, osteopathy and physiotherapy professional associations. Man Ther. 2003 Feb;8(1):46-51. doi: 10.1054/math.2002.0472. — View Citation
Hoehler FK, Tobis JS, Buerger AA. Spinal manipulation for low back pain. JAMA. 1981 May 8;245(18):1835-8. — View Citation
Hoffman KS, Hoffman LL. Effects of adding sacral base leveling to osteopathic manipulative treatment of back pain: a pilot study. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1994 Mar;94(3):217-20, 223-6. — View Citation
Hoyt WH, Bard DA, Shaffer F. Experience with an antigravity leverage device for chronic low back pain: a clinical study. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1981 Mar;80(7):474-9. No abstract available. — View Citation
Jokl P. Twenty-eighth annual AOA/NOF Research Conference, 1984: part I. Keynote address: Muscle and low-back pain. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1984 Sep;84(1):64-6. No abstract available. — View Citation
Kimberly PE. Formulating a prescription for osteopathic manipulative treatment. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1980 Apr;79(8):506-13. No abstract available. — View Citation
Korr IM. The spinal cord as organizer of disease processes: IV. Axonal transport and neurotrophic function in relation to somatic dysfunction. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1981 Mar;80(7):451-9. No abstract available. — View Citation
Licciardone JC, Russo DP. Blinding protocols, treatment credibility, and expectancy: methodologic issues in clinical trials of osteopathic manipulative treatment. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2006 Aug;106(8):457-63. — View Citation
Licciardone JC, Stoll ST, Fulda KG, Russo DP, Siu J, Winn W, Swift J Jr. Osteopathic manipulative treatment for chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jul 1;28(13):1355-62. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000067110.61471.7D. — View Citation
Licciardone JC. The unique role of osteopathic physicians in treating patients with low back pain. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2004 Nov;104(11 Suppl 8):S13-8. — View Citation
McPartland JM, Giuffrida A, King J, Skinner E, Scotter J, Musty RE. Cannabimimetic effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2005 Jun;105(6):283-91. — View Citation
Mein EA, Greenman PE, McMillin DL, Richards DG, Nelson CD. Manual medicine diversity: research pitfalls and the emerging medical paradigm. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2001 Aug;101(8):441-4. — View Citation
Nadler SF. Nonpharmacologic management of pain. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2004 Nov;104(11 Suppl 8):S6-12. — View Citation
Navratil L, Kymplova J. Contraindications in noninvasive laser therapy: truth and fiction. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 2002 Dec;20(6):341-3. doi: 10.1089/104454702320901134. — View Citation
Niemisto L, Sarna S, Lahtinen-Suopanki T, Lindgren KA, Hurri H. Predictive factors for 1-year outcome of chronic low back pain following manipulation, stabilizing exercises, and physician consultation or physician consultation alone. J Rehabil Med. 2004 May;36(3):104-9. doi: 10.1080/16501970310019151. — View Citation
Patterson, MM, PhD, Editorial - Research in OMT: What is the question and do we understand it?, JAOA, January 2007, Vol. 107, No. 1, pp. 8-11.
Ramirez MA, Haman J, Worth L. Low back pain: diagnosis by six newly discovered sacral tender points and treatment with counterstrain. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1989 Jul;89(7):905-6, 911-3. — View Citation
Snider KT, Johnson JC, Snider EJ, Degenhardt BF. Increased incidence and severity of somatic dysfunction in subjects with chronic low back pain. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2008 Aug;108(8):372-8. — View Citation
Task Force on the Low Back Pain Clinical Practice Guidelines. American Osteopathic Association Guidelines for Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT) for Patients With Low Back Pain. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2016 Aug 1;116(8):536-49. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2016.107. — View Citation
Tong HC, Heyman OG, Lado DA, Isser MM. Interexaminer reliability of three methods of combining test results to determine side of sacral restriction, sacral base position, and innominate bone position. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2006 Aug;106(8):464-8. — View Citation
Wearn AM, Greenfield SM. Access to complementary medicine in general practice: survey in one UK health authority. J R Soc Med. 1998 Sep;91(9):465-70. doi: 10.1177/014107689809100904. — View Citation
Williams N. Managing back pain in general practice--is osteopathy the new paradigm? Br J Gen Pract. 1997 Oct;47(423):653-5. — View Citation
Williams NH, Wilkinson C, Russell I, Edwards RT, Hibbs R, Linck P, Muntz R. Randomized osteopathic manipulation study (ROMANS): pragmatic trial for spinal pain in primary care. Fam Pract. 2003 Dec;20(6):662-9. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmg607. — View Citation
* Note: There are 32 references in all — Click here to view all references
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | 10 cm visual analog scale for quantitative back pain | VAS Data collected at all visits | 8 weeks | |
Primary | SF-36 Health Survey to measure Quality of Life | SF-36 survey data collected at 3 points | 8 weeks | |
Primary | The Oswestry Back Questionnaire to measure qualitative back pain | Oswestry questionnaire data collected at 3 points | 8 weeks |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04409353 -
Virtual Reality Therapy for Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02946073 -
Buprenorphine (CAM2038) in Subjects With a Recent History of Moderate to Severe Chronic Low Back Pain
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04727385 -
Intervertebral DXM Gel Injection in Adults With Painful Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04156802 -
Project Relief: Developing Brain Stimulation as a Treatment for Chronic Pain
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT02529566 -
Human Autograft Mesenchymal Stem Cell Mediated Stabilization of The Degenerative Lumbar Spine
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01894282 -
Mind Body Intervention for Chronic Lower Back Pain
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02157389 -
Psychobiological Mechanisms of Placebo and Nocebo Effects in the Treatment of Chronic Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06282770 -
Photobiomodulation for Lower Back Pain Post Spinal Fusion and Decompression Surgery
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04415177 -
Virtual Reality Trial Using EaseVRx For Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05894213 -
Prevalence and Factors Associated With Sarcopenia in Pre-retirement Aged Adults With Chronic Non-specific Lower Back Pain
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT02241824 -
Chronic Opioid Use in Low Back Pain and Lumbar Orthosis Intervention
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02611466 -
A Study to Assess the Analgesic Efficacy of ASP7962 in Patients With Pain Due to Osteoarthritis of the Knee
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03049644 -
A Trial Comparing Mechanical Diagnosis and Treatment to Manual Therapy
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02539979 -
A Trial of Intravenous Paracetamol vs. Placebo in Patients Receiving Radiofrequency Ablation of the Medial Branch Facet Nerve
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05843890 -
Tailored Pain Guide (TPG) Study
|
N/A |