Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Insomnia in Chronic Spinal Pain

Chronic Low Back Pain Clinical Trial

Official title:

Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Insomnia in Patients With Chronic Spinal Pain: a Multi-center Randomized Controlled Trial

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03482856
• Other study ID #: EC/2018/0277
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: March 29, 2018
• Est. completion date: July 30, 2022

Study information

• Verified date: November 2022
• Source: University Ghent
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Chronic spinal pain (CSP) includes chronic low back and neck pain. CSP is a highly prevalent and severely debilitating disorder characterized by tremendous personal and socioeconomic impact, long-term sick leave, low quality of life and very high socioeconomical costs. The current strategies for treating CSP are not yet optimal in reducing pain and related disability, urging the need for improvement. A possible problem is that the current approaches are often to limited and only address pain. Current treatments for CSP do not address associated complaints like sleeping problems which are however important issues. If present, sleeping problems may contribute to CSP severity and related disability. If left untreated, they represent a barrier for effective CSP management. Up to now, however, sleeping problems are hardly addressed and if so, it is mostly limited to sleeping medication. This is a problem since the efficacy and safety of drug treatment has not been established. Therefore, within the current innovative project we propose examining the added value of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) to the current best physical therapy treatment for CSP. CBT-I includes changing negative thoughts about sleep, sleep hygiene, altering sleeping patterns, and teaching relaxation skills. The objectives of the study are to examine if CBT-I combined with the modern physical therapy approach (education about pain followed by exercise therapy) is more effective than the modern physical therapy approach alone for reducing pain, improving sleep and functionality in CSP patients with sleeping problems. Therefore 120 CSP patients with sleeping problems will be randomly divided over the 2 treatment programs (60 per group) and will be assessed before and after their 14-week therapy program consisting of 18 therapy sessions. Comparisons will be made for pain severity, sleep quality and functionality.

Description:

Modern pain neuroscience has advanced our understanding of chronic spinal pain (CSP). Despite the scientific progresses with regard to the treatment of chronic spinal pain (CSP), current treatments for CSP do not address pain comorbidities like insomnia, an important yet seldom addressed issue. Treatment of CSP mostly still relies on monotherapies or on biomedical models, as shown by expensive but ineffective treatments like lumbar fusion surgery, ignoring important comorbidities such as insomnia. Within the current innovative project we propose examining the added value of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) to the current best evidence treatment for CSP. The innovative nature of this approach to CSP goes well beyond the combination of 2 available and effective treatments: combining cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia with the recently established modern neuroscience approach (pain neuroscience education followed by cognition-targeted exercise therapy) strengthens the content of both individual approaches and applies the current understanding regarding insomnia and pain neuroscience to clinical practice. This innovative combination will result in a synergistic effect of both treatments. The primary scientific objective of the study is to examine if CBT-I combined with a modern neuroscience approach (pain neuroscience education followed by cognition-targeted exercise therapy) is more effective than the modern neuroscience approach alone for reducing pain in CSP patients with insomnia. Secondary objectives of the study are to examine if CBT-I combined with the modern neuroscience approach is more effective than the modern neuroscience approach alone for improving pain related outcomes, sleep related outcomes and physical activity/functionality in CSP patients with insomnia. To comply with these scientific objectives, the 120 CSP patients with comorbid insomnia will be subjected to the baseline assessment of all outcome measures. Follow-up assessments will be performed immediately after 14 weeks of therapy (all tests), and 3 months (questionnaires), 6 months (questionnaires) and 12 months (all tests, depending on a go/no go decision) after finishing the therapeutic intervention. To investigate these objectives, a muli-center triple-blind randomized, controlled trial with 1 year follow up will be performed. Appropriate statistical analyses will be performed to evaluate and compare treatment effects. Statistical, as well as clinical significant differences will be defined and the effect size will be determined.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 123
• Est. completion date: July 30, 2022
• Est. primary completion date: July 30, 2022
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 65 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Nonspecific spinal pain for at least 3 months' duration, at least 3 days per week
• Seeking care because of neck pain or low back pain
• Native Dutch speaker
• Having insomnia: in the absence of other intrinsic sleep disorders and shift work, insomnia is defined as > 30 minutes of sleep latency and/or minutes awake after sleep onset for > 3 days / week for > 6 months
• Living or working within a radius of 50 km around the therapy location
• Not starting new treatments or medication and continuing their usual care 6 weeks prior to and during study participation (to obtain a steady state)
• Refraining from analgesics, caffeine, alcohol or nicotine in the previous 48h of the assessments
• Nonspecific failed back surgery > 3 years are permitted
• Not undertaking exercise (> 3 metabolic Equivalents) 3 days before the assessments

Exclusion Criteria:

• Severe underlying sleep pathology (identified through baseline data of polysomnography)
• Neuropathic pain
• Chronic widespread pain
• Being pregnant or pregnancy (including given birth) in the preceding year
• History of specific spinal surgery
• Thoracic pain in absence of neck or low back pain
• Shift workers
• Diagnosed depression
• Body Mass Index below 30

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Chronic Low Back Pain
• Chronic Neck Pain
• Insomnia Chronic
• Low Back Pain
• Neck Pain
• Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders

Intervention

Behavioral:
• MNA plus CBT-I
MNA plus CBT-I includes 3 sessions (1 group, 1 online and 1 individual session) of therapeutic pain neuroscience education, 6 individual sessions of CBT-I and 9 individual sessions of time-contingent dynamic and functional cognition-targeted exercise therapy, combined with home exercises. CBT-I is the standard evidence-based care for treating chronic primary insomnia and typically includes changing negative thoughts about sleep, sleep hygiene, sleep restriction therapy, and teaching relaxation skills. The 18 sessions will be spread over a period of 14 weeks.
• MNA alone
MNA alone includes 3 sessions (1 group, 1 online and 1 individual session) of therapeutic pain neuroscience education, and 15 individual sessions of time-contingent dynamic and functional cognition-targeted exercise therapy, combined with home exercises. The 18 sessions will be spread over a period of 14 weeks.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Belgium	University Hospital Brussels	Brussels	Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest
Belgium	University Hospital Ghent	Ghent	Oost-Vlaanderen

Sponsors (5)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University Ghent	Research Foundation Flanders, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, University Hospital, Ghent, Vrije Universiteit Brussel

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Belgium, 

References & Publications (4)

Malfliet A, Kregel J, Meeus M, Cagnie B, Roussel N, Dolphens M, Danneels L, Nijs J. Applying contemporary neuroscience in exercise interventions for chronic spinal pain: treatment protocol. Braz J Phys Ther. 2017 Sep-Oct;21(5):378-387. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2017.06.019. Epub 2017 Jul 8. — View Citation

Nijs J, Lluch Girbes E, Lundberg M, Malfliet A, Sterling M. Exercise therapy for chronic musculoskeletal pain: Innovation by altering pain memories. Man Ther. 2015 Feb;20(1):216-20. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2014.07.004. Epub 2014 Jul 18. — View Citation

Nijs J, Mairesse O, Neu D, Leysen L, Danneels L, Cagnie B, Meeus M, Moens M, Ickmans K, Goubert D. Sleep Disturbances in Chronic Pain: Neurobiology, Assessment, and Treatment in Physical Therapist Practice. Phys Ther. 2018 May 1;98(5):325-335. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzy020. — View Citation

Nijs J, Meeus M, Cagnie B, Roussel NA, Dolphens M, Van Oosterwijck J, Danneels L. A modern neuroscience approach to chronic spinal pain: combining pain neuroscience education with cognition-targeted motor control training. Phys Ther. 2014 May;94(5):730-8. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130258. Epub 2014 Jan 30. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Brief Pain Inventory (Numeric Rating Scale)	Change in self-reported pain: The question "please rate your pain by circling the one number that best describes your pain on the AVERAGE" is used as the primary outcome measure to evaluate pain intensity. Scale ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more self-reported pain.	Baseline assessment, T1 follow-up assessment after 14 weeks of therapy, T2 follow-up assessment 3 months after the end of therapy, T3 follow-up assessment 6 months after the end of therapy, and T4 follow-up assessment 12 months after the end of therapy
Secondary	Brief Pain Inventory	Change in self-reported impact of pain on functioning. Scale ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more self-reported pain or higher interference of pain in daily life.	Baseline assessment, T1 follow-up assessment after 14 weeks of therapy, T2 follow-up assessment 3 months after the end of therapy, T3 follow-up assessment 6 months after the end of therapy, and T4 follow-up assessment 12 months after the end of therapy
Secondary	Central Sensitization Inventory	Change in self-reported central sensitization symptoms. Score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more self-reported symptoms of central sensitization.	Baseline assessment, T1 follow-up assessment after 14 weeks of therapy, T2 follow-up assessment 3 months after the end of therapy, T3 follow-up assessment 6 months after the end of therapy, and T4 follow-up assessment 12 months after the end of therapy
Secondary	Pressure Pain Thresholds	Change in Pressure Pain Thresholds at measured bilaterally with a digital pressure algometer (Wagner Instruments), both at symptomatic levels (trapezius muscle and 5 centimetres lateral to the spinous process of L3) and at remote sites (i.e. secondary hyperalgesia).	Baseline assessment, T1 follow-up assessment after 14 weeks of therapy, and T4 follow-up assessment 12 months after the end of therapy
Secondary	Polysomnography (PSG)	Change in polysomnography. Participants will be monitored in the comfort of their own home by ambulatory PSG.	Baseline assessment, T1 follow-up assessment after 14 weeks of therapy, and T4 follow-up 12 months after the end of therapy. Polysomnography T4 assessment will be carried out based on a go/no go decision, if improvements are visible at the T1 assessment.
Secondary	Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index	Change in self-reported perceived sleep quality. Score ranges from 0 to 21, 0 indicating no difficulty and 21 indicating severe sleep difficulties.	Baseline assessment, T1 follow-up assessment after 14 weeks of therapy, T2 follow-up assessment 3 months after the end of therapy, T3 follow-up assessment 6 months after the end of therapy, and T4 follow-up assessment 12 months after the end of therapy
Secondary	Insomnia Severity Index	Change in self-reported insomnia severity. Score ranges from 0 to 28, with 0 indicating no clinically significant insomnia and 28 indicating severe clinical insomnia.	Baseline assessment, T1 follow-up assessment after 14 weeks of therapy, T2 follow-up assessment 3 months after the end of therapy, T3 follow-up assessment 6 months after the end of therapy, and T4 follow-up assessment 12 months after the end of therapy
Secondary	DBAS (i.e. Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep)	Change in self-reported dysfunctional beliefs and attitudes about sleep. Score ranges from 0 to 10. Scores above 4 indicate unrealistic expectations for sleep or unrealistic thoughts about sleep.	Baseline assessment, T1 follow-up assessment after 14 weeks of therapy, T2 follow-up assessment 3 months after the end of therapy, T3 follow-up assessment 6 months after the end of therapy, and T4 follow-up assessment 12 months after the end of therapy
Secondary	Epworth Sleepiness Scale	Change in self-reported sleep propensity. Score ranges from 0 to 24, with 0 indicating normal daytime sleepiness and 24 indicating severe excessive daytime sleepiness.	Baseline assessment, T1 follow-up assessment after 14 weeks of therapy, T2 follow-up assessment 3 months after the end of therapy, T3 follow-up assessment 6 months after the end of therapy, and T4 follow-up assessment 12 months after the end of therapy
Secondary	Brugmann Fatigue Scale	Change in self-reported fatigue severity. Score ranges from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating higher subjective levels of fatigue.	Baseline assessment, T1 follow-up assessment after 14 weeks of therapy, T2 follow-up assessment 3 months after the end of therapy, T3 follow-up assessment 6 months after the end of therapy, and T4 follow-up assessment 12 months after the end of therapy
Secondary	Hospital Anxiety and Depression rating scale	Change in self-reported affective symptoms. Score ranges from 0 to 21, with 0 indicating absence of depression or anxiety and 21 indicating the presence of depression or anxiety.	Baseline assessment, T1 follow-up assessment after 14 weeks of therapy, T2 follow-up assessment 3 months after the end of therapy, T3 follow-up assessment 6 months after the end of therapy, and T4 follow-up assessment 12 months after the end of therapy
Secondary	Physical Activity using Actigraphy	Change in physical activity: Continuous assessment of physical activity and rest/activity cycles	1 week at baseline, 1 week at T1 follow-up assessment after 14 weeks of therapy, 1 week at T4 follow-up assessment 12 months after the end of therapy
Secondary	Short Form Health Survey - 36 items Mental Health	Change in self-reported functional status and well-being or quality of life. Score ranges from 0 to 400 with higher scores indicating better mental health.	Baseline assessment, T1 follow-up assessment after 14 weeks of therapy, T2 follow-up assessment 3 months after the end of therapy, T3 follow-up assessment 6 months after the end of therapy, and T4 follow-up assessment 12 months after the end of therapy
Secondary	Short Form Health Survey - 36 items Physical Health	Change in self-reported functional status and well-being or quality of life. Score ranges from 0 to 400 with higher scores indicating better physical health.	Baseline assessment, T1 follow-up assessment after 14 weeks of therapy, T2 follow-up assessment 3 months after the end of therapy, T3 follow-up assessment 6 months after the end of therapy, and T4 follow-up assessment 12 months after the end of therapy