Relative-dose-response Test (RDR) Adaptation for Chronic Liver Disease

Chronic Liver Disease Clinical Trial

Official title:

Responsiveness of RDR Test to Assess Hepatic Vitamin A Stores in Chronic Liver Disease

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT01634698
• Other study ID #: CEPHUCFF 06801
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• First received: June 25, 2012
• Last updated: July 2, 2012
• Start date: October 2007
• Est. completion date: December 2008

Study information

• Verified date: May 2012
• Source: Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: Brazil: National Committee of Ethics in Research
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The relative-dose-response test (RDR) is considered to be the most accurate method for evaluating vitamin A nutritional status (VANS) in patients suffering from liver disease, as it infers the reserves of the vitamin in the liver. However, for the RDR test to reflect VANS in patients suffering from chronic liver disease, factors inherent to the disease need to be considered, such as possible malabsorption, advanced age, a drop in synthesis and/or the release of retinol binding protein (RBP), which would result in an inadequate response to the RDR test. Thus, the objective of present study is to assess the adequacy of two different protocol for using the RDR test in patients with cirrhosis and cirrhosis-related hepatocellular carcinoma.

Methods: The sample group was comprised of 178 patients at Federal University of Rio de Janeiro University Hospital (111 men) with several etiologies of liver cirrhosis at different stages in the progression of the disease. They were sorted into two groups, according to the retinyl palmitate dosage (1500 IU or 2500 IU) received at T0 (blood sample taken following a 12-hour fast). Following supplementation, the investigators took further blood samples five and seven hours later (T5 and T7). The investigators assessed VANS via concentrations of serum retinol and RBP, as well as by way of the RDR test. The cutoff points the investigators used for denoting inadequacy in the indicators retinol and RDR were, respectively, < 1.05 µmol/L and ≥ 20%. To classify the degrees of severity of the disease the investigators used the criteria established by Child & Pugh (1973).

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 178
• Est. completion date: December 2008
• Est. primary completion date: December 2007
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 20 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• diagnosis of liver cirrhosis of viral etiology, alcoholic or metabolic action

Exclusion Criteria:

• malabsorption syndromes

• moderate or severe infection

• diabetes mellitus using insulin renal, cardiac or respiratory

• therapeutic doses of vitamin A in the 6 months prior to data collection

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety Study, Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Subject), Primary Purpose: Diagnostic

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Chronic Liver Disease
• Liver Diseases

Intervention

Dietary Supplement:
• retinyl palmitate (UNICEF, Melbourne, Australia)
the patients received an oral dose of 1500 IU or 2500 IU, once.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Brazil	Gabriela Villaça Chaves	Rio de Janeiro	RJ

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Brazil, 

References & Publications (1)

Peres WA, Chaves GV, Gonçalves JC, Ramalho A, Coelho HS. Vitamin A deficiency in patients with hepatitis C virus-related chronic liver disease. Br J Nutr. 2011 Dec;106(11):1724-31. doi: 10.1017/S0007114511002145. Epub 2011 Jun 8. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Change from Baseline in retinol status (RDR test) at 5 and/or 7 hour after supplementation	Therapeutic response is evaluated by means of circulating serum retinol, 5 and 7 hours after the administration of vitamin A. The RDR was calculated by the following formula, using the values of serum retinol in the three times of blood collection (Loerch et al., 1979), expressed in percentages: RDR (%) = [(A0-Ax) / Ax] x100 where A0 is the serum retinol at time 0 (fasting) and Ax is the serum retinol 5 or 7 h after administration of vitamin A. It was used as the RDR cutoff = 20%, indicating indirect hepatic reserve inadequate	RDR will be calculated for the two intervention groups (1500 or 2500 IU vitamin A), for the two moments of blood sampling, 5 and 7 hours after supplementation.	No
Secondary	serum retinol-binding protein (RBP)		RBP were analyzed at baseline, 5 and 7 hours after supplementation as a variable that explain the appropriate response or failure to respond to the RDR test.	No