Body Fluid Dynamics in Hemodialysis Patients, an Estimation of Dry Weight

Chronic Kidney Disease Clinical Trial

Official title:

Evaluation of Body Hydration Status in Hemodialysis Patients Using Segmental Bioimpedance Analysis

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Terminated

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT02325908
• Other study ID #: RRI091-97
• Status: Terminated
• Phase: N/A
• First received: December 16, 2014
• Last updated: February 22, 2016
• Start date: April 2008
• Est. completion date: February 2015

Study information

• Verified date: February 2016
• Source: Renal Research Institute
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: United States: Institutional Review Board
• Study type: Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to learn how the amount of fluid in the body of a hemodialysis patient affects him or her. Body hydration is the amount of fluid in the human body and known to be related to blood pressure. Too much fluid can lead to high blood pressure which can cause heart problems and eventually lead to death. Bioimpedance Spectroscopy (BIS) is a method that may be used to measure body hydration. This can be applied in the whole body, arm, trunk, calf, and leg. It is a non-invasive and inexpensive method and no known risk. BIS measurements can be used to assess optimal hydration status which is defined as a patient's ideal weight after completing a dialysis treatment. The investigators hypothesize that your target weight may be better estimated by the BIS. The results of this study, in particular the continuous measurement of calf hydration which is associated with the hydration of the whole body, may provide useful information about physiologic ("healthy") body hydration. It may possibly help to improve treatment procedures for patients in the future. The Renal Research Institute plans to enroll 100 chronic hemodialysis patients and 200 healthy controls in this study.

Description:

Estimation of the hydration state of chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients is an important aspect of clinical practice. Deterioration in renal function often leads to volume overload with resulting hypertension and there is no simple and accurate technique available to measure body hydration at the moment.

In hemodialysis (HD) patients, one limitation to adequate ultrafiltration necessary to achieve optimal hydration status (dry weight) is inadequate vascular refilling from the interstitial space. Blood pressure may decrease due to limitation of vascular refilling even when dry weight is far from being achieved. Therefore, an objective and accurate method to provide hydration state would be very useful for clinical practice. Whole body bioimpedance techniques have been used to measure body fluid volume for many years. However, it is difficult to accurately indicate the hydration state by body fluid volume of normal variations, and the accuracy of measurement is influenced by various body compositions. Recently, the investigators have proposed that hydration can be approached using a calf bioimpedance technique by monitoring change in resistance during HD. Since the lower limbs tend to contain more fluid than other body segments in ambulatory people due to the effect of gravity, measurement of the calf provides more accurate information about body hydration in the HD patient.

In this study, the investigators hypothesize that:

1. Since the degree of hydration is greater in the leg than in the arm and the trunk due to the effect of gravity, monitoring change in resistance in the whole or part of the leg will provide information as to whether optimal hydration status (a state in which excess extracellular fluid is absent) has been attained. The investigators postulate that a change in the slope of resistance curve (CSR) in the calf approaches zero as optimal hydration status is achieved.

2. Optimal hydration status can be approximated by comparison of two values: (1) measurement of local electrical resistivity in the interstitial compartment and (2) known range of resistivity in healthy subjects (HS). Combination of the normalized resistivity (μ) and CSR are considered as indicators of physiological optimal hydration status. Physiological optimal hydration status, as an objective index, is a major goal of hemodialysis so that the excess body water can be maximally removed according to this value. In practice this can be approached but should never be exceeded.

Because flattening of the curve should be verified by the near normal resistivity, a group of healthy subjects would have to be added to provide a normal range of resistivity at all ages and both sexes.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Terminated
• Enrollment: 89
• Est. completion date: February 2015
• Est. primary completion date: December 2014
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 18 Years to 80 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Stable hemodialysis patients believed to be at all levels of hydration by their treating physician should be chosen.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Myocardial infarction or stroke in the preceding 6 months

• Two episodes of hypotension (systolic BP < 90 mmHg) during the 3 dialysis procedures preceding entering the treatment phase

• Grade IV CHF by NY classification

• Simultaneous participation in another clinical study except observational trials.

• Any psychological condition which could interfere with the patient's ability to comply with the study protocol.

• Pregnancy.

• Amputation of a limb.

• Pace maker, implantable pump, artificial joint.

Study Design

Observational Model: Case Control, Time Perspective: Prospective

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Chronic Kidney Disease
• Kidney Diseases
• Renal Insufficiency, Chronic

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Renal Research Institute

References & Publications (18)

Bogaard HJ, de Vries JP, de Vries PM. Assessment of refill and hypovolaemia by continuous surveillance of blood volume and extracellular fluid volume. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1994;9(9):1283-7. — View Citation

Frankel VH, McLeod KJ. Calf muscle pump stimulation as an adjunct to orthopaedic surgery. Surg Technol Int. 2005;14:297-304. — View Citation

Franz M, Pohanka E, Tribl B, Woloszczuk W, Hörl WH. Living on chronic hemodialysis between dryness and fluid overload. Kidney Int Suppl. 1997 Jun;59:S39-42. Review. — View Citation

Jaeger JQ, Mehta RL. Assessment of dry weight in hemodialysis: an overview. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999 Feb;10(2):392-403. Review. — View Citation

Katzarski K, Charra B, Laurent G, Lopot F, Divino-Filho JC, Nisell J, Bergström J. Multifrequency bioimpedance in assessment of dry weight in haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1996;11 Suppl 2:20-3. — View Citation

Kouw PM, Kooman JP, Cheriex EC, Olthof CG, de Vries PM, Leunissen KM. Assessment of postdialysis dry weight: a comparison of techniques. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1993 Jul;4(1):98-104. — View Citation

Leunissen KM, Kooman JP, van Kuijk W, van der Sande F, Luik AJ, van Hooff JP. Preventing haemodynamic instability in patients at risk for intra-dialytic hypotension. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1996;11 Suppl 2:11-5. Review. — View Citation

Leypoldt JK, Cheung AK. Evaluating volume status in hemodialysis patients. Adv Ren Replace Ther. 1998 Jan;5(1):64-74. Review. — View Citation

Lopot F, Kotyk P, Bláha J, Forejt J. Use of continuous blood volume monitoring to detect inadequately high dry weight. Int J Artif Organs. 1996 Jul;19(7):411-4. — View Citation

Madhavan G, Stewart JM, McLeod KJ. Cardiovascular systemic regulation by plantar surface stimulation. Biomed Instrum Technol. 2006 Jan-Feb;40(1):78-84. — View Citation

Madhavan G, Stewart JM, McLeod KJ. Effect of plantar micromechanical stimulation on cardiovascular responses to immobility. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 May;84(5):338-45. — View Citation

Piccoli A. Identification of operational clues to dry weight prescription in hemodialysis using bioimpedance vector analysis. The Italian Hemodialysis-Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (HD-BIA) Study Group. Kidney Int. 1998 Apr;53(4):1036-43. — View Citation

Spiegel DM, Bashir K, Fisch B. Bioimpedance resistance ratios for the evaluation of dry weight in hemodialysis. Clin Nephrol. 2000 Feb;53(2):108-14. — View Citation

Steuer RR, Germain MJ, Leypoldt JK, Cheung AK. Enhanced fluid removal guided by blood volume monitoring during chronic hemodialysis. Artif Organs. 1998 Aug;22(8):627-32. — View Citation

Stewart JM, Karman C, Montgomery LD, McLeod KJ. Plantar vibration improves leg fluid flow in perimenopausal women. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2005 Mar;288(3):R623-9. Epub 2004 Oct 7. — View Citation

Zhu F, Kuhlmann MK, Sarkar S, Kaitwatcharachai C, Khilnani R, Leonard EF, Greenwood R, Levin NW. Adjustment of dry weight in hemodialysis patients using intradialytic continuous multifrequency bioimpedance of the calf. Int J Artif Organs. 2004 Feb;27(2):1 — View Citation

Zhu F, Schneditz D, Levin NW. Sum of segmental bioimpedance analysis during ultrafiltration and hemodialysis reduces sensitivity to changes in body position. Kidney Int. 1999 Aug;56(2):692-9. — View Citation

Zhu F, Schneditz D, Wang E, Martin K, Morris AT, Levin NW. Validation of changes in extracellular volume measured during hemodialysis using a segmental bioimpedance technique. ASAIO J. 1998 Sep-Oct;44(5):M541-5. — View Citation

* Note: There are 18 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Dry weight as determined by segmental bioimpedance in comparison to baseline		1 month	No
Secondary	Mean pre dialysis and post dialysis blood pressure in comparison to baseline		1 month	No
Secondary	Numbers and doses of blood pressure medications prescribed	If the blood pressure is improved based on better assessment of dry weight, the need for multiple blood pressure meds and dosing will be reduced.	1 month	No