View clinical trials related to Chronic Hepatitis B.
Filter by:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of HRS9950 tablets in chronic hepatitis B patients who are virologically suppressed on nucleoside or nucleotide analogues (NAs).
The investigator aimed to prospectively study the effect of the hepatic fibrosis on quantifying hepatic steatosis using ultrasound attenuation imaging (ATI value) in patients with chronic hepatitis B.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety of TAF in HBV-infected pregnant women.
The goal of this clinical trial is to test ISA104 in patients with chronic hepatitis B. The main question[s] it aims to answer are: - How safe is ISA104? - Does ISA104 induce immunity against hepatitis B virus? Different doses of the vaccine ISA104 will be administered to participants. These participants are chronic HBV patients being actively treated with antiviral drugs. Researchers will compare the ISA104 vaccine to a placebo.
This is a multicenter, randomized, controlled Phase IIa study of HH-003 injection, HH-003 injection is a monoclonal antibody targeting Hepatitis B virus. This study aims to evaluate the antiviral activity and safety in subjects with with HBeAg-negative Chronic Hepatitis B treated with nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors.
CB06-036 is an investigational drug developed by Shanghai Zhimeng Biopharma Inc. for the treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B.
The study is being conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of HRS-5635 in healthy adults and chronic hepatitis B. To explore the reasonable dosage of HRS-5635.
This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, 48-week follow-up, Phase IIa clinical study. This study has been designed to evaluate the change in HBsAg (log10 IU/mL) after administration of hzVSF-v13 50 mg/dose and hzVSF-v13 200 mg/dose in combination with an oral antiviral agent (Tenofovir or entecavir, including salt-free or salt-modifying drugs) compared to an oral antiviral agent in combination with a placebo (normal saline) in patients with chronic hepatitis B who are stably receiving an oral antiviral agent (Tenofovir or entecavir, including salt-free or salt-modifying drugs) for at least 24 weeks.
This is a multicenter, randomized, open, blank controlled trial ，in order to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Amibufenamide（TMF） in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection patients with normal ALT .
BACKGROUND: Finite nucleos(t)ide analogue (Nuc) therapy was proposed as an alternative strategy in the management of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) but there remained not data from randomized controlled trials to clarify safety and efficacy of this treatment strategy. AIMS: The investigators aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of finite Nuc therapy versus continuous treatment in CHB patients without liver cirrhosis and also to identify factors that may predict therapeutic responses and clinical outcomes after withdrawal of Nuc treatment for CHB MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a multicenter randomized controlled trial conducted in Taiwan. Eligible patients are adults (age≥20 years) with CHB (chronic infection ≥ 6 months) who fulfill the APASL guideline 2016 to stop NA therapy. Those with cirrhosis, malignancy, organ transplant, autoimmune disorder, or serious underlying diseases including renal impairment were excluded. A total of 360 patients will be enrolled. Enrolled patients are randomly allocated with a 1:1 ratio to continue viral suppression with entecavir (0.5mg once daily) or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (300mg once daily) or stop the treatment. All patients will be followed up according to the protocol recommended by a panel of APASL experts. The primary analysis for study outcomes is scheduled at 3 years after randomization and the primary outcome is seroclearance of HBsAg. There will be interim analyses scheduled at one- and two-years following randomization of the first 200 patients, and also one-and two years following randomization of the planned 360 patients, to determine whether early termination of the trial may be justified by attainment of the efficacy endpoint (10% vs 1% of HBsAg seroclearance) or concerns of the safety outcomes (significant between-group difference in mortality, acute on chronic liver failure, or acute flares with hepatic decompensation).