View clinical trials related to Chronic Hepatitis B.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to compare the long-term efficacy and safety of entecavir 1.0 mg/d + adefovir 10 mg/d with entecavir 0.5 mg/d + adefovir 10 mg/d for chronic hepatitis B patients with inadequate response to NUC therapy
Background: - There are two forms of chronic hepatitis B. The difference between the forms is whether or not a viral protein called hepatitis B e antigen is present in the blood. Standard approaches to treating both forms of chronic hepatitis B involve different drugs. One drug is called peginterferon, another is called tenofovir DF. These drugs are often given separately and used for different forms of the disease. However, researchers want to see if combining peginterferon and tenofovir DF will be a more effective treatment than tenofovir DF alone. Objectives: - To see whether combining tenofovir DF and peginterferon, or using tenofovir DF alone, is a more effective treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Eligibility: - Individuals at least 18 years of age who have chronic hepatitis B and are in the Hepatitis B Research Network Cohort study. Design: - Participants will be screened with a physical exam and medical history. Blood, urine, and liver tissue samples will be collected. Bone and liver imaging studies will also be performed. - Participants will be divided into two groups. One group will have tenofovir DF alone for 192 weeks (about 4 years). The other group will have tenofovir DF and peginterferon for 24 weeks (about 6 months), and then tenofovir DF alone for 168 weeks (about 3.5 years). - Participants will take the study drugs on the schedule determined by their study doctors. They will keep a diary to record their doses and any side effects. - Participants will have three study visits 4 weeks apart after the starting the treatment. At these visits, they will have a physical exam and provide blood samples. They may also provide urine samples and have imaging studies. - After the first three study visits, participants will continue to have study visits every 12 weeks until the treatment ends at week 192. These visits will have many of the same tests as the first three visits. At some of these visits, they may fill out questionnaires about their quality of life. - Participants who do not respond to the study drugs may have their medications changed. They may also be asked to stop treatment.
Background: The HBsAg clearance rate in interferon-treated responders is significantly higher than that in lamivudine-treated responders, implying immune control is the key to HBsAg clearance. There is a good chance to further increase the cure rate if the investigators can enhance the HBV-specific immune response when the HBsAg level already comes to a low level. Hypothesis: HBsAg-based vaccine can enhance HBsAg clearance in chronic hepatitis B patients whose HBsAg already <=2000 IU/ml. Patients and methods: This pilot study will enroll 20 chronic hepatitis B patients with HBsAg ≦2000 IU/ml, no hepatic decompensation, no HIV coinfection, nor clinical immunodeficiency. Engerix-B vaccine (20μg for <20 years old and 40 μg for ≥ 20 years old) will be given every 2 months for one year. HBsAg quantification, anti-HBs, and HBV DNA will be surveyed regularly before each dose during the treatment period and every 3 months for another year following the last dose. Viral and cellular factors will be studied to discover determinants affecting HBsAg clearance. Aims 1. To elucidate whether HBsAg-based vaccine can reactivate host immunity to eliminate chronic HBV infection in patients with low titer HBsAg. 2. To delineate the doses to response (HBsAg clearance or decline rate) correlation so as to design a feasible schedule for future clinical trials in a larger group of patients. 3. To discover viral and host factors which can be used as biomarkers for personalized vaccine therapy.
The purpose of this study is to examine the immunogenicity and efficacy of HBsAg Vaccine in combination with Entecavir in patients who have been treated with HB110E HBV DNA vaccine.
Lamivudine had been widely used for treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B patients. However, development of antiviral resistance has been known as the major drawback: Incidence of lamivudine resistance was reported to be approximately 70% after 5 years (Lok AS et al, 2003). For the treatment of lamivudine resistance, adefovir has been widely used (Lok AS and McMahon B, 2009). However, switching to adefovir monotherapy was also reported to be at high risk of resistance, 25% at year 2 (Yeon JE et al, 2006). Recently, adding adefovir on lamivudine was shown to be superior to switching to adefovir monotherapy by decreasing the adefovir resistance (Rapti I et al, 2007, Lampertico P et al, 2007). However, combination of adefovir and lamivudine does not increase antiviral activity compared with adefovir monotherapy in patients with lamivudine resistance (Peters MG et al, 2004). As many patients are still viremic with the treatment of lamivudine and adefovir over 1 year, the investigators need more potent combination of the drugs. Telbivudine is a new nucleoside analogue with potent antiviral activity. The previous phase III study has shown the superiority of telbivudine over lamivudine in HBeAg positive and negative subjects (Lai CL et al, 2007). Therefore, telbivudine plus adefovir may be a better treatment option than lamivudine plus adefovir for the lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B patients. No study assessing the efficacy of telbivudine plus adefovir has been conducted for these patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of telbivudine plus adefovir compared with lamivudine plus adefovir in lamivudine resistant chronic hepatitis B patients at the end of 1 year follow-up,
Chronic hepatitis B virus infection is an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and entecavir were licensed for the treatment of hepatitis B virus infection. In this study, the investigators will try to make comparison between Entecavir and Tenofovir and investigate the efficacy.
This study proposes to compare the effect of 48 weeks exposure to pegylated interferon alpha vs. nucleoside analogue (NA) on hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion and HBsAg levels in nucleoside analogue controlled HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who have an undetectable hepatitis B virus (HBV) viral load at least 1 years.
This study is aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of Peginterferon alfa-2b (40kD, Y-shape), in a dose of 180μg/week, in chronic hepatitis B patients, and collects sufficient evidences for the listed of the studied drug.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of telbivudine and lamivudine use during late pregnancy for the prevention of HBV perinatal transmission in highly viraemic mothers.
This study will provide a rationale for switch from lamivudine plus adefovir to tenofovir monotherapy in Lamivudine plus Adefovir Treated Lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B patients with Undetectable Hepatitis B Virus DNA