View clinical trials related to Chronic Hepatitis B.
Filter by:The study is an open-label, randomized, comparative, multicenter clinical trial. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of ABX203, a new chronic hepatitis B therapeutic vaccine administered as an adjunct therapy to nucleos(t)ide analogs (NUCs), in maintaining control of Hepatitis B disease after cessation of treatment with NUCs in subjects with HBeAg negative chronic Hepatitis B.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of Oxymatrine plus Lamivudine Combination Therapy and whether it could lower the incidence of Lamivudine long-term resistance compared to Lamivudine Monotherapy.
The primary objectives of this study are to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of GS-4774 in adults with CHB and who are currently not on treatment. Participants will be randomized to receive TDF alone or GS-4774 plus TDF for 20 weeks. After Week 20, GS-4774 will be discontinued. All participants will continue on TDF and will be followed for an additional 28 weeks. Following completion of the 48 week study period, all participants will be eligible for a treatment extension for 96 weeks.
The study was conducted to evaluate the effect of anti-viral treatment on long-term outcome on patients with chronic hepatitis B.
The primary objectives of this study are to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of vesatolimod in participants with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection currently being treated with oral antivirals (OAV). Participants will be randomized in 3 sequential cohorts (Cohorts A, B, and C). Within each cohort, participants will be randomized in a 1:3:3:3 ratio to placebo or one of the doses of vesatolimod (1, 2, or 4 mg).
An exploratory clinical trial to evaluate the pharmacokinetic characteristics of I.V. Hepabig injection used for prevention of hepatitis B relapse after liver transplantation.
This Phase 1 trial will assess the dose-related safety and PK profile of different doses of NVR 3-778, first in healthy volunteer subjects (part I) and subsequently in patients with chronic hepatitis B (part II). Additionally, in Part II, changes in patients' serum HBV DNA levels and other virologic efficacy parameters will be assessed.
This will be a multi-center study in Hong Kong. This is a retrospective-prospective study in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients. HBeAg-negative patients on entecavir followed up in the liver clinics will be identified from the existing database. All patients had HBV DNA testing every 6 months as a clinic routine. Serum HBsAg levels will be tested in the residual serum samples at the pre-treatment and last follow-up visits. Eligible patients will be discussed on the plan of stopping entecavir therapy. All patients will have written informed consent before recruited into this study. All patients will be followed up for 12 months after stopping entecavir treatment. As entecavir is most commonly used antiviral drug in Hong Kong and in the Western countries, the investigators aim to investigate and validate the use of serum HBsAg quantification to guide the timing of stopping entecavir in HBeAg-negative patients. The results of this study will provide scientific evidence on the use of this new serum marker to predict sustained remission after stopping entecavir. In the long-run, it can improve patient compliance, reduce the need of long-term antiviral and reduce the drug cost in the management of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B. All patients will stop entecavir according to the Asian Pacific guideline with written informed consent and close subsequent monitoring. In the protocol, there is a safety net for re-treatment. There will not be any invasive procedure. There is no major ethical issue.
The purpose of the study was to assess the efficacy and safety of telbivudine at a dose of 20 mg/kg up to a maximum of 600 mg q.d. in compensated pediatric HBeAg-positive and negative CHB patients aged 2 to <18 years with the indication of antiviral CHB treatment. This study was part of the commitments of the pediatric development plan for telbivudine in Europe and US.
Previous studies dealt with patients who maintained antiviral drugs for 2 ~ 6 months after final chemotherapy and they revealed that many of the patients who stopped preemptive antiviral drug within 6 months experienced viral reactivation. Based on the study results, guidelines recommend that preemptive antiviral therapy should be maintained for at least 6 months. Nevertheless, many clinicians apply the preemptive antiviral drugs for 1~2 years or longer after final chemotherapy without definite evidences, and this practice increases the medical expenditure a lot. Therefore, the investigators are going to find out the proper and safe duration of preemptive antiviral therapy which can be a good reference in the future practice.