Chronic Functional Constipation Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Prospective Cohort Study On the Efficacy of Vibrating Capsule For Different Subtypes of Chronic Functional Constipation
This study is a multi-center prospective cohort study, which plans to include 600 patients with chronic functional constipation to treat with Vibrabot capsules and patients will be grouped according to subtypes. During the study, the patients' basic information, baseline constipation status and treatment information, capsule intake during treatment, and concomitant medication will be collected. During the treatment phase, patients follow the doctor's advice to receive Vibrabot capsule treatment and maintain stable dietary intake and exercise according to the constipation diagnosis and treatment guidelines. During the study, patients need to fill in the relevant information during the treatment in the electronic questionnaire in a timely and truthful manner. The treatment effect of the patients is evaluated by assessing the number of occurrences of spontaneous bowel movements (SBM) and complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBM).
Status | Not yet recruiting |
Enrollment | 600 |
Est. completion date | July 1, 2026 |
Est. primary completion date | December 31, 2025 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: Patients who can be diagnosed with functional constipation according to the Rome IV criteria. Patients who consent to participate in this trial and voluntarily sign the informed consent form (ICF). Exclusion Criteria: People who are not eligible for surgery or refuse to undergo any abdominal surgery; People with known or suspected gastrointestinal obstruction, stenosis, diverticulum, bleeding, malformation, and fistula. People allergic to polymeric materials; People implanted with cardiac pacemakers and using gastrointestinal pacemakers; People with abdominal aortic aneurysms, gastrointestinal vascular lesions, ulcers, and lesions with bleeding tendencies. People with dysphagia; Pregnant women; People with severe depression and anxiety and severe acute gastrointestinal lesions. People with other conditions, so the investigator considers them not eligible for this study. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
China | Changhai hospital | Shanghai |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Changhai Hospital | Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai 10th People's Hospital, Shanghai 6th People's Hospital, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Pudong New Area Gongli Hospital, Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine |
China,
Camilleri M, Kerstens R, Rykx A, Vandeplassche L. A placebo-controlled trial of prucalopride for severe chronic constipation. N Engl J Med. 2008 May 29;358(22):2344-54. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0800670. — View Citation
Scott SM, Simren M, Farmer AD, Dinning PG, Carrington EV, Benninga MA, Burgell RE, Dimidi E, Fikree A, Ford AC, Fox M, Hoad CL, Knowles CH, Krogh K, Nugent K, Remes-Troche JM, Whelan K, Corsetti M. Chronic constipation in adults: Contemporary perspectives and clinical challenges. 1: Epidemiology, diagnosis, clinical associations, pathophysiology and investigation. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021 Jun;33(6):e14050. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14050. Epub 2020 Dec 2. — View Citation
Zhu JH, Qian YY, Pan J, He C, Lan Y, Chen WN, Wang BM, Zhao W, Li JN, Li XQ, Lv B, Fan YH, Zuo XL, Li Z, Zou DW, Li ZS, Liao Z. Efficacy and safety of vibrating capsule for functional constipation (VICONS): A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Apr 25;47:101407. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101407. eCollection 2022 May. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | After treatment, whether the response rate of patients using the Vibrabot vibrating capsules alone reaches 50%. | The definition of the responder is a patient with an average weekly increase of =1 complete spontaneous bowel movement (CSBM) compared to the baseline. | At the end of the sixth week of treatment | |
Secondary | Proportion of constipated patients who use/do not use other constipation treatment methods | Collect relevant data through daily defecation questionnaires. | At the end of the sixth week of treatment | |
Secondary | Proportion of constipated patients who use/do not use other constipation treatment methods | Collect relevant data through daily defecation questionnaires. | at the end of the 4-week follow-up | |
Secondary | Proportion of patients with an average increase of =1 CSBMs per week compared to the baseline period | Collect relevant data through daily defecation questionnaires,CSBM refers to spontaneous defecation without anal obstruction and without taking laxatives within 24 hours before defecation. | At the end of the sixth week of treatment | |
Secondary | Proportion of respondents with an average of =3 SBMs per week during the treatment period | Collect relevant data through daily defecation questionnaires, SBM refers to spontaneous defecation without taking laxatives within 24 hours before defecation. | At the end of the sixth week of treatment | |
Secondary | Proportion of subjects with =3 SBMs per week and an increase of =1 CSBMs during at least 4 weeks of treatment compared to baseline | Collect relevant data through daily defecation questionnaires, SBM refers to spontaneous defecation without taking laxatives within 24 hours before defecation.CSBM refers to spontaneous defecation without anal obstruction and without taking laxatives within 24 hours before defecation. | At the end of the sixth week of treatment | |
Secondary | Proportion of patients with an average increase of =1 CSBMs per week during the follow-up phase compared to the baseline period; | Collect relevant data through daily defecation questionnaires. | At the end of the sixth week of treatment | |
Secondary | Proportion of patients with an average of =3 SBMs per week during the follow-up phase | Collect relevant data through daily defecation questionnaires. | at the end of the 4-week follow-up | |
Secondary | Proportion of patients with a reduction of =1 point in total PAC-QOL and PAC-SYM scores after treatment compared to the baseline period | Collect relevant data through daily defecation questionnaires. | At the end of the sixth week of treatment | |
Secondary | Time of first use of laxative or enema after a course of vibrating capsule treatment (6 weeks) | Collect relevant data through daily defecation questionnaires. | After the end of the sixth week of treatment | |
Secondary | Population Distribution by Subtypes | Proportion of different subtypes in the population | After the end of the sixth week of treatment |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT01901445 -
Quality of Life in Children and Adolescents With Chronic Functional Constipation: Educational Action Effects
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06418685 -
Real-World Clinical Study on the Efficacy of Vibrating Capsule (Vibrabot Capsule) for Chronic Functional Constipation
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03018613 -
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Chronic Functional Constipation
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06364111 -
Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Vibrabot Capsule and Polyethylene Glycol for Chronic Functional Constipation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02751411 -
Effectiveness & Safety of Promelaxin® Microenemas Against Macrogol 4000 P.O. in Chronic Constipation in Children 6-48 Months
|
Phase 4 |