Gamifying Patient's Personal Data Validation and Completion in a Personal Health Record

Chronic Disease Clinical Trial

Official title:

Gamifying Patient's Personal Data Validation and Completion in a Personal Health Record

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT02970461
• Other study ID #: 2258
• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• First received: November 15, 2016
• Last updated: November 17, 2016
• Start date: July 2016
• Est. completion date: December 2016

Study information

• Verified date: November 2016
• Source: Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: Argentina: Administracion Nacional de Medicamentos, Alimentos y Tecnologia Medica
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

A randomized controlled trial design is used to test the efficacy of gamification elements to drive user behavior in a personal health record.

Description:

Electronic personal health record systems (PHRs) support patient centered healthcare by making medical records and other relevant information accessible to patients, thus assisting patients in health self-management[1,2]. The Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires (HIBA) is a private hospital in Buenos Aires, capital of Argentina. It has 500 beds and serves around 50,000 patients per month. Its main facilities cover a surface area of 78,000 m² (850,000 ft²). The hospital treats both private patients and those derived by social security. It also provides its own Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) being the most important pre-paid healthcare service in Argentina, with about 150,000 clients. HIBA has a Health Information System (HIS) and Electronic Health Records (EHR) since 1998 and implemented a PHR in 2007. The PHR gives patients access to aspects of the EHR related to their Health Care (laboratory, diagnosis, preventive information, medications lists), supports messaging with their physician, scheduling services and medication delivery for Self management, among other things. The majority of HIBA HMO affiliates are enrolled to this PHR. In 2015 HIBA underwent the process of accreditation by the United States Joint Commission[3]. As part of this process, HIBA redefined and refined the EHR/PHR data set, including new fields and regrouping pre-existent ones. EHR/PHR's personal data set is now composed of a series of fields grouped as depicted below. Personal data information is a difficult data set to capture, particularly those regarding social and cultural background information[4]. This data set is not only useful to help better healthcare system management, it is also relevant as it is used for epidemiological and preventive purposes[5-7].

Gamification is a term used to describe using game elements in non-game environments to enhance user experience[8,9]. It has been incorporated with commercial success into several platforms (Linkedin, Badgeville, Facebook). While over the past years gamification elements have been incorporated in healthcare scenarios there is still little evidence on how effective they are[10-12]. Game elements provide engagement consistent with various theories of motivation[13], positive psychology (e.g., flow)[14], and also provide instant feedback. Feedback is more effective when it provides sufficient and specific information for goal achievement and is presented relatively close in time to the event being evaluated. Feedback can reference individual progress, can make social comparisons, or can refer to task criteria.

In order to assess whether gamification is an effective tactic to drive PHR users' behavior, an intervention was designed. The investigators used gamification elements such as points, graphical representations and playful attitude to the design and interactions of the Bio page in the Hospital's PHR. These elements provide instant feedback to user actions. A control group with no game elements will be compared with a gamified group to see if these new game elements would increase patient's personal data rectification, validation and completion in the Hospital's PHR. A status variable was created and assigned to all fields according to the following scheme:

• Completed: user has modified empty field.

• Corrected: user has modified non-empty field.

• Verified: user has updated Group but field data has experienced no change.

• Validated: user has clicked on the "validate" button.

EHR/PHR Personal data set

1. Contact Information

• First Name

• Last Name

• Date of Birth

• ID Number

2. Nationality

• Citizenship

• Languages Spoken

3. Place of Residence

• Street

• Number

• Floor

• Zip Code

• Town

• Province

• Country

4. E-Mail

• E-mail address

5. Phone Numbers

• Home Number

• Work Number

• Fax

6. Emergency Contact

• First Name

• Last Name

• Relationship with patient

• Address

• Phone Number

7. Billing Information

• Street

• Number

• Floor

• Zip Code

• Town

• Province

• Country

8. Social Aspects

• Type of Residence

• Living Situation

9. Education

• Highest Academic Degree Achieved

10. Cultural Aspects

• Religious Belief

11. Special Needs

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Enrollment: 40000
• Est. completion date: December 2016
• Est. primary completion date: November 2016
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patients enrolled in the Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires system who are over 18 years old

• Patients who are registered in Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires' Personal Health Record

• Patients whose use of the Personal Health Record during the previous year exceeds the median of use

Exclusion Criteria:

• Refusal to participate or to the informed consent process

• Subjects with a record of Obsessive Compulsive Disorders or related condition as per DSM IV

• Subjects with a record of Neurological conditions that could impair reading (aphasia, dementia, etc)

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Investigator), Primary Purpose: Treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Chronic Disease

Intervention

Other:
• Gamified Group
See Gamified Group in Arms description.
• Control Group
See Control Group in Arms description.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Argentina	Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Gascon 450	Buenos Aires

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires	Salumedia Tecnologias

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Argentina, 

References & Publications (13)

Cahill JE, Gilbert MR, Armstrong TS. Personal health records as portal to the electronic medical record. J Neurooncol. 2014 Mar;117(1):1-6. doi: 10.1007/s11060-013-1333-x. Review. — View Citation

Deterding S, Dixon D, Khaled R, Nacke L, Sicart M, O'Hara K. Gamification: Using Game Design Elements in Non-Game Contexts. Proc 2011 Annu Conf Ext Abstr Hum Factors Comput Syst (CHI 2011). 2011:2425-2428. doi:10.1145/1979742.1979575.

Jci. Joint Commission International Accreditation Standards for Hospitals. Jt Comm Resour Inc. 2013;5th Ed. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.

Kaelber DC, Jha AK, Johnston D, Middleton B, Bates DW. A research agenda for personal health records (PHRs). J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008 Nov-Dec;15(6):729-36. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2547. — View Citation

King D, Greaves F, Exeter C, Darzi A. 'Gamification': influencing health behaviours with games. J R Soc Med. 2013 Mar;106(3):76-8. doi: 10.1177/0141076813480996. — View Citation

Lister C, West JH, Cannon B, Sax T, Brodegard D. Just a fad? Gamification in health and fitness apps. JMIR Serious Games. 2014 Aug 4;2(2):e9. doi: 10.2196/games.3413. — View Citation

McKeown S, Krause C, Shergill M, Siu A, Sweet D. Gamification as a strategy to engage and motivate clinicians to improve care. Healthc Manage Forum. 2016 Mar;29(2):67-73. doi: 10.1177/0840470415626528. Review. — View Citation

Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. 1991. Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. HarperCollins Publishers, New York, New York, USA.

Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):68-78. — View Citation

Tang PC, Ash JS, Bates DW, Overhage JM, Sands DZ. Personal health records: definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Mar-Apr;13(2):121-6. — View Citation

Tang PC, Black W, Young CY. Proposed criteria for reimbursing eVisits: content analysis of secure patient messages in a personal health record system. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006:764-8. — View Citation

Tenforde M, Jain A, Hickner J. The value of personal health records for chronic disease management: what do we know? Fam Med. 2011 May;43(5):351-4. Review. — View Citation

Wells S, Rozenblum R, Park A, Dunn M, Bates DW. Organizational strategies for promoting patient and provider uptake of personal health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Jan;22(1):213-22. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-003055. — View Citation

* Note: There are 13 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Change in Number of Completed Fields	See "Completed" and "EHR/PHR Personal data set" in Study Detailed Description for more information.	Measured at baseline, 30 days after and 6 months after	No
Secondary	Change in Number of Corrected Fields	See "Corrected" and "EHR/PHR Personal data set" in Study Detailed Description for more information.	Measured at baseline, 30 days after and 6 months after	No
Secondary	Change in Number of Validated Fields	See "Validated" and "EHR/PHR Personal data set" in Study Detailed Description for more information.	Measured at baseline, 30 days after and 6 months after	No