Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT03265769 |
Other study ID # |
Atadek2017/13 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
August 8, 2017 |
Est. completion date |
July 8, 2021 |
Study information
Verified date |
September 2021 |
Source |
Acibadem University |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Pecutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of chronic total occlusions (CTOs) is most commonly
performed using bilateral transfemoral access and 8 French guiding catheters. However,
transfemoral approach (TFA) is associated with higher risk of vascular access complications.5
It has been reported that using transradial approach (TRA) reduces vascular complications and
may be associated with a better clinical outcome. Transradial access is also used in complex
PCI interventions.There is a growing body of evidence regarding the use of this approach also
in CTO procedures. In available literature, all studies comparing TRA vs. TFA in CTO
consisted of single center and single operator experience. Besides, none of them is
randomized. To fill in the gap, we sought to examine the technique and outcomes of
transradial vs. transfemoral CTO PCI in a contemporary multicenter randomized study.
Description:
All consecutive patients referred for CTO PCI between August 2017 and July 2021 at Acibadem
University Kocaeli Acibadem Hospital, Kocaeli; Erciyes University Medical Faculty, Kayseri;
Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Haseki Cardiology Institute; Istanbul;
Memorial Bahcelievler Hospital, Istanbul were screened for enrollment in the study. The
exclusion criteria included: (a) any acute coronary syndrome within 3 months; (b) severe
heart failure issues; (c)severe renal failure (d) failure to provide written informed
consent.The radial access group consisted of patients with single or bi-radial approach. Any
femoral artery puncture was considered a femoral case. For example, a crossover from any
radial to femoral access was considered a femoral case. Procedures were performed by 4
interventional cardiologists, who are dedicated radial operators, at 4 different centers. The
protocol was approved by the institutional review board and all patients provided written
informed consent.