Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05815576
Other study ID # B3222022000964
Secondary ID S66498
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date February 3, 2023
Est. completion date February 2024

Study information

Verified date April 2023
Source Université Catholique de Louvain
Contact Jean-Louis Peters-Dickie
Phone +32471687257
Email jean-louis.peters@uclouvain.be
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The current study involves a prospective interventional study that primarily intends to compare foot joint loadings of participants with chronic ankle instability (CAI) with those of subjects who recovered after an ankle sprain (LAS copers) and healthy controls during running and more challenging tasks. This study further aims to explore the impact of foot muscle properties and fatigue on the same biomechanical outcomes. Therefore, the investigators will recruit 72 participants (24 per group) aged from 18 to 44 years. Each of them will come only once to the CMAL laboratory (UZ Leuven, Pellenberg).


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 72
Est. completion date February 2024
Est. primary completion date February 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender Male
Age group 18 Years to 44 Years
Eligibility Three groups of participants : Chronic ankle instability, lateral ankle sprain copers and healthy controls. INCLUSION CRITERIA: 1. For all three groups : - Physically active male subjects between 18 and 44 years of age - Able to run at low speed. - For homogeneity purposes, the investigators will only recruit subjects who perform a regular physical activity on a weekly basis, including competition participation. 2. Chronic ankle instability : - A history of at least one significant ankle sprain that occurred at least 12 months before study enrolment, associated with inflammatory symptoms, creating at least 1 interrupted day of desired physical activity; - The most recent injury occurred more than 3 months prior to study enrolment; - At least two episodes of giving way in the 6 months prior to study enrolment, recurrent sprain, and/or "feelings of instability"; and - Poor disability status according to the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) (score = 24/30). 3. Lateral ankle sprain copers : - A history of one significant ankle sprain that occurred at least 12 months before study enrolment, associated with inflammatory symptoms, creating at least 1 interrupted day of desired physical activity; - A return to at least moderate levels of weight-bearing physical activity less than 12 months after initial sprain without recurrent injury, episodes of giving way, and/or feelings of instability; - Minimal, if any, level of self-reported disability (CAIT score = 28/30); and - Minimal, if any, alteration in self-reported function (ADL- and Sport-subscales =95%). 4. Healthy controls : - The same inclusion criteria as the LAS coper group, with the exception reported in the exclusion criteria. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: 1. For all three groups : - Being younger than 18 years - Any medical contraindication to physical exertion, - Any systemic or neurological disease, - A recent surgery, - A difference in leg length of more than 3 cm, - Pregnancy, - A body mass index higher than 30kg/m² (due to less accurate motion analysis by absence of anatomical landmarks). - LAS copers and controls will also be excluded if: constant or intermittent ankle pain, ankle fractures, or surgeries, and recent participation in a physical revalidation programme. - Healthy participants must never have suffered an inversion trauma resulting in disability. 2. For healthy controls : the healthy control subjects may not have suffered from an ankle sprain.

Study Design


Intervention

Behavioral:
Intrinsic foot muscle fatigue
Electrostimulation will be delivered through electrodes placed on the abductor hallucis (NOT invasive). The investigators plan 4 sets of 4 minutes of repeated contractions (electrostimulation + voluntary contraction).

Locations

Country Name City State
Belgium UZ Leuven, Pellenberg Lubbeek

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Université Catholique de Louvain UZ Leuven, campus Pellenberg (Belgium)

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Belgium, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Lower limb joint angles Part of "Kinematic data"
Unit of measurement: Degrees
Measurement tools: Vicon software (data acquisition) + Matlab routine (data processing)
Method: Joint angles will be measured based on the position of passive markers placed on participants' anatomical landmarks all over the lower limbs. The position of those markers will be tracked by 10 infrared high-speed cameras that surround the walkway (sampled at 100Hz - type T-10, 1 megapixel, captures 10-bit grayscale using 1120 * 896 pixels, Vicon Motion System Ltd, Oxford, Metrics, UK).
The angular positions of the multiple joints that constitute the lower limb (hip, knee, ankle, chopart, lisfranc and metatarsophalangeal) will be assessed during running, side-cutting and crossing over a small obstacle in the gait laboratory.
Baseline
Primary Lower limb joint angles Part of "Kinematic data"
Unit of measurement: Degrees
Measurement tools: Vicon software (data acquisition) + Matlab routine (data processing)
Method: Joint angles will be measured based on the position of passive markers placed on participants' anatomical landmarks all over the lower limbs. The position of those markers will be tracked by 10 infrared high-speed cameras that surround the walkway (sampled at 100Hz - type T-10, 1 megapixel, captures 10-bit grayscale using 1120 * 896 pixels, Vicon Motion System Ltd, Oxford, Metrics, UK).
The angular positions of the multiple joints that constitute the lower limb (hip, knee, ankle, chopart, lisfranc and metatarsophalangeal) will be assessed during running, side-cutting and crossing over a small obstacle in the gait laboratory.
5 minutes after the end of the intervention
Primary Lower limb joint angular velocities Part of "Kinematic data"
Unit of measurement: Degrees/second
Measurement tool: Vicon software + Matlab routine
Method: Joint angular velocities are also assessed based on reflexive markers placed on anatomical landmarks. This outcome evaluates the rate of change of a certain joint angle over time.
Joint angular velocities will be assessed during running, side-cutting and crossing over a small obstacle in the gait laboratory.
Baseline
Primary Lower limb joint angular velocities Part of "Kinematic data"
Unit of measurement: Degrees/second
Measurement tool: Vicon software + Matlab routine
Method: Joint angular velocities are also assessed based on reflexive markers placed on anatomical landmarks. This outcome evaluates the rate of change of a certain joint angle over time.
Joint angular velocities will be assessed during running, side-cutting and crossing over a small obstacle in the gait laboratory.
5 minutes after the end of the intervention
Primary Joint moments Part of "Kinetic data"
Unit of measurement: Newton-meter
Measurement tools: Pressure plate + Force plate + Vicon software + Matlab routine
Methods: Joint moments will be determined by coupling kinematic data (joint position and velocities) with plantar pressure data from a specially designed pressure plate (sampled at 200Hz, Footscan, dimension 0.5m x 0.4m, 4096 sensors, 2.8 sensors/cm², RsScan International, Olen, Belgium) embedded in the middle of the runway and placed on top of a force plate (sampled at 1000Hz, Advanced Mechanical Technology Inc., Watertown, MA, USA).
Kinetic data will be assessed while running, side-cutting and crossing over a small obstacle in the gait laboratory.
Baseline
Primary Joint moments Part of "Kinetic data"
Unit of measurement: Newton-meter
Measurement tools: Pressure plate + Force plate + Vicon software + Matlab routine
Methods: Joint moments will be determined by coupling kinematic data (joint position and velocities) with plantar pressure data from a specially designed pressure plate (sampled at 200Hz, Footscan, dimension 0.5m x 0.4m, 4096 sensors, 2.8 sensors/cm², RsScan International, Olen, Belgium) embedded in the middle of the runway and placed on top of a force plate (sampled at 1000Hz, Advanced Mechanical Technology Inc., Watertown, MA, USA).
Kinetic data will be assessed while running, side-cutting and crossing over a small obstacle in the gait laboratory.
5 minutes after the end of the intervention
Primary Joint powers Part of "Kinetic data"
Unit of measurement: Watt
Measurement tools: Pressure plate + Vicon software + Matlab routine
Methods: Joint moments will be determined by coupling kinematic data (joint position and velocities) with plantar pressure data from a specially designed pressure plate (sampled at 200Hz, Footscan, dimension 0.5m x 0.4m, 4096 sensors, 2.8 sensors/cm², RsScan International, Olen, Belgium) embedded in the middle of the runway and placed on top of a force plate (sampled at 1000Hz, Advanced Mechanical Technology Inc., Watertown, MA, USA).
Kinetic data will be assessed while running, side-cutting and crossing over a small obstacle in the gait laboratory.
Baseline
Primary Joint powers Part of "Kinetic data"
Unit of measurement: Watt
Measurement tools: Pressure plate + Vicon software + Matlab routine
Methods: Joint moments will be determined by coupling kinematic data (joint position and velocities) with plantar pressure data from a specially designed pressure plate (sampled at 200Hz, Footscan, dimension 0.5m x 0.4m, 4096 sensors, 2.8 sensors/cm², RsScan International, Olen, Belgium) embedded in the middle of the runway and placed on top of a force plate (sampled at 1000Hz, Advanced Mechanical Technology Inc., Watertown, MA, USA).
Kinetic data will be assessed while running, side-cutting and crossing over a small obstacle in the gait laboratory.
5 minutes after the end of the intervention
Primary Intrinsic foot muscle thickness Unit of measurement: cm
Methods: The thickness of five intrinsic foot muscles (abductor hallucis, flexor digitorum brevis, flexor hallucis, quadratus plantae and abductor digiti minimi) will be measured on images obtained using ultrasonography.
To obtain those images, the investigators will scan the muscles in a longitudinal view.
Baseline
Primary Intrinsic foot muscle area Unit of measurement: cm² (cm square)
Methods: The area of five intrinsic foot muscles (abductor hallucis, flexor digitorum brevis, flexor hallucis, quadratus plantae and abductor digiti minimi) will be measured on images obtained using ultrasonography.
To obtain those images, the investigators will scan the muscles in a transversal view.
Baseline
Secondary Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool This questionnaire assesses the level of perceived instability (higher scores indicate less self-reported instability).
Scores ranging from 0 to 30.
The CAIT is valid and reliable, and has known minimal detectable changes. It has been validated in French and Dutch.
This is an inclusion questionnaire.
Baseline
Secondary Foot and Ankle Activity Measure This questionnaire assesses the level of self-reported functional limitations (higher scores indicate less limitations).
Score ranging from 0 to 100%
The FAAM is valid, reliable and responsive to change. It has been validated in French and Dutch. It contains two subscales: Activity of Daily Life (ADL) and Sports. A "Quick" version has shown strong concurrent validity with the full-length FAAM.
This is an inclusion questionnaire
Baseline
Secondary Ankle-specific Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire This questionnaire is an adapted version of the original FABQ designed to assess kinesiophobia in people with low-back pain. The term "back" was changed to "ankle" and item 8 of the original FABQ was deleted. It contains two subscales: Physical Activity and Work.
Higher scores indicate more kinesiophobia. Scores ranging from 0 to 90.
The ankle-specific FABQ has shown acceptable internal consistency, and its use is encouraged in people with a history of ankle sprain, with known minimal detectable change. The FABQ questionnaire was validated in French, and a non-validated Dutch version was published.
Baseline
Secondary Foot muscle strength Unit of measurement: Newton
Method: Foot muscle strength will be evaluated using a hand-held dynamometer, with participants hook lying. The investigators will both report the strength of the big toe and the strength of the other toes (as a whole). This method showed good to excellent intra and inter-rater reliability.
Baseline
Secondary Change from baseline in hallux flexion strength after the intervention Unit of measurement: Newton
Method: Hallux flexion strength will be evaluated using a hand-held dynamometer, with participants hook lying.
The difference between before and after the intervention (fatigue protocol) will be reported.
Change between baseline and immediately post-intervention
Secondary Foot Posture Index No unit of measurement.
The Foot Posture Index 6-item is a valid measure of foot posture (pronation, neutral and supination). Its reliability is subject of debate, ranging from poor to excellent for inter-rater and from moderate to excellent for intra-rater. The participants will stand bilaterally in a static position during the assessment.
Baseline
Secondary Navicular drop Unit of measurement: cm
The investigators will assess navicular drop as the difference in distance between the navicular tuberosity to the ground from sitting to double-limb stance
Baseline
Secondary Modified Star Excursion Balance Test Unit of measurement: cm
The modified Star Excursion Balance Test assesses dynamic balance. In recent studies involving subjects with CAI, the mSEBT was preferred over the original eight-direction version because the former measures are the most often altered in this population and the remaining directions add thus little value.
The original SEBT is reliable, valid, reproducible, and responsive to change.
The modified SEBT requires the participant to reach the ground as far as possible with his leg in the anterior, postero-medial and postero-lateral directions. The procedure is repeated until three valid trials are measured in each direction for each leg.
A mean score will then be calculated for each direction as the mean of the three valid trials with one leg. Those values will first be normalized by the leg length and a composite score will then be calculated as the mean of the three directions reached with one leg.
Baseline
Secondary Perceived foot fatigue No unit of measurement.
Participants will be asked to score their perceived foot fatigue every four minutes during the fatigue protocol.
This will be done based on a verbal scale from 0 (no perceived fatigue at all) to 10 (highest fatigue the participant could imagine).
The foot muscle fatigue protocol lasts 16 minutes. Time frame 16 minutes is thus equal to "immediately post-intervention".
4 minutes after the beginning of the intervention
Secondary Perceived foot fatigue NB: Same as above
No unit of measurement.
Participants will be asked to score their perceived foot fatigue every four minutes during the fatigue protocol.
This will be done based on a verbal scale from 0 (no perceived fatigue at all) to 10 (highest fatigue the participant could imagine).
The foot muscle fatigue protocol lasts 16 minutes. Time frame 16 minutes is thus equal to "immediately post-intervention".
8 minutes after the beginning of the intervention
Secondary Perceived foot fatigue NB: Same as above
No unit of measurement.
Participants will be asked to score their perceived foot fatigue every four minutes during the fatigue protocol.
This will be done based on a verbal scale from 0 (no perceived fatigue at all) to 10 (highest fatigue the participant could imagine).
The foot muscle fatigue protocol lasts 16 minutes. Time frame 16 minutes is thus equal to "immediately post-intervention".
12 minutes after the beginning of the intervention
Secondary Perceived foot fatigue NB: Same as above
No unit of measurement.
Participants will be asked to score their perceived foot fatigue every four minutes during the fatigue protocol.
This will be done based on a verbal scale from 0 (no perceived fatigue at all) to 10 (highest fatigue the participant could imagine).
The foot muscle fatigue protocol lasts 16 minutes. Time frame 16 minutes is thus equal to "immediately post-intervention".
Immediately after the end of the intervention
Secondary Electrostimulation current intensity Unit of measurement: mA (milli-amperes).
Every 4 minutes, electrostimulation current intensity will be reported during the foot muscle fatigue protocol.
NB: This current intensity should gradually increase during the fatigue protocol as there is a habituation phenomenon. In other words, constant intensity produces decreasing discomfort.
The foot muscle fatigue protocol lasts 16 minutes. Time frame 16 minutes is thus equal to "immediately post-intervention".
4 minutes after the beginning of the intervention
Secondary Electrostimulation current intensity NB: Same as above
Unit of measurement: mA (milli-amperes).
Every 4 minutes, electrostimulation current intensity will be reported during the foot muscle fatigue protocol.
NB: This current intensity should gradually increase during the fatigue protocol as there is a habituation phenomenon. In other words, constant intensity produces decreasing discomfort.
The foot muscle fatigue protocol lasts 16 minutes. Time frame 16 minutes is thus equal to "immediately post-intervention".
8 minutes after the beginning of the intervention
Secondary Electrostimulation current intensity NB: Same as above
Unit of measurement: mA (milli-amperes).
Every 4 minutes, electrostimulation current intensity will be reported during the foot muscle fatigue protocol.
NB: This current intensity should gradually increase during the fatigue protocol as there is a habituation phenomenon. In other words, constant intensity produces decreasing discomfort.
The foot muscle fatigue protocol lasts 16 minutes. Time frame 16 minutes is thus equal to "immediately post-intervention".
12 minutes after the beginning of the intervention
Secondary Electrostimulation current intensity NB: Same as above
Unit of measurement: mA (milli-amperes).
Every 4 minutes, electrostimulation current intensity will be reported during the foot muscle fatigue protocol.
NB: This current intensity should gradually increase during the fatigue protocol as there is a habituation phenomenon. In other words, constant intensity produces decreasing discomfort.
The foot muscle fatigue protocol lasts 16 minutes. Time frame 16 minutes is thus equal to "immediately post-intervention".
Immediately after the end of the intervention
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT06228378 - Comparative Spectroscopic Analysis of Synovial Fluid From the Stable and Unstable Ankle N/A
Terminated NCT03818438 - Chronic Ankle Instability Diagnostic Tests Determining Underlying Deficits
Recruiting NCT02955485 - A Prediction Model for Chronic Ankle Instability
Completed NCT05585385 - Effect of Backward Walking Versus Balance Training in Chronic Ankle Instability Patients N/A
Recruiting NCT06118879 - Role of Sensory Deficits on Sensorimotor Control in Athletes With Chronic Ankle Instability N/A
Completed NCT06020131 - Effect Of Thoracic Mobility Versus Lumbopelvic Stabilization Exercises On Patients With Chronic Ankle Instability N/A
Recruiting NCT04322409 - NMES and Chronic Ankle Instability Phase 1
Completed NCT04083391 - Flexibility Deficit in Chronic Ankle Instability
Withdrawn NCT03706729 - Elite Athletes With Chronic Ankle Instability Using Spraino®: A Cohort Study N/A
Completed NCT04360798 - The Effectiveness of Unilateral and Bilateral Exercise Training in Patients With Lateral Ankle Instability N/A
Completed NCT04064502 - Chronıc Ankle Instabılıty And Assocıated Factors
Active, not recruiting NCT01781351 - Neuromuscular Control of the Ankle With External Support N/A
Completed NCT01733433 - Influence of Taping on Postural Control in Subjects With Chronic Ankle Instability N/A
Completed NCT05455957 - The Effect of Neuromuscular and Vestibulo-Ocular Training on Balance,Isokinetic Strength and Proprioception in Chronic Ankle Instability N/A
Completed NCT04599985 - Effect of Balance Training Protocols on Balance, Proprioception, ROM, and Pain in Athlete With Chronic Ankle Instability N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06269471 - On the ICC's Path: a Prevalence Study
Completed NCT06204861 - The Effect of Capacitive and Resistive Electric Transfer Therapy in Chronic Ankle Instability Patients N/A
Completed NCT05327244 - The Impact of Real-World Vibration Feedback Gait Retraining on Gait Biomechanics in People With Chronic Ankle Instability N/A
Completed NCT03598985 - Smartphone for Assessing Balance in Patients With Ankle Instability
Recruiting NCT05757375 - Mulligan Ankle Taping on Volleyball Players N/A