Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05732168
Other study ID # EPK 676 - 2021
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date January 1, 2021
Est. completion date December 8, 2022

Study information

Verified date March 2023
Source Linnaeus University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational [Patient Registry]

Clinical Trial Summary

Purpose: The primary aim of this study was to investigate subjects with chronic ankle instability regarding strength, balance and functional performance with an easily used test battery that required minimal equipment. A second aim was to evaluate which of these tests that has the highest ability to discriminate impaired function between injured and non-injured ankle in CAI subjects. Methods: This study was conducted with a cross-sectional design. A total of 20 (11 women) CAI subjects, engaged in sports, were tested for assessment of strength, balance and functional performance using the following tests; isometric strength in inversion and eversion, the single leg stance test (SLS), single leg hop for distance (SLHD) and side hop test. Additionally, 15 healthy subjects were tested with the same test battery for the evaluation of


Description:

Study design and procedure Data for cross-sectional study, adhering to the STROBE statement were collected during 2021-2022 where subjects with chronic ankle instability (CAI) were evaluated with tests of strength, balance and functional performance. Outcome measures The primary outcome was ankle function, in subjects with CAIs, which was assessed by a test battery consisting of two muscle strength tests, one balance test and two functional performance tests. Muscle strength Ankle inversion and eversion isometric muscle strength were assessed using hand-held dynamometry, MicroFET2 (Hoggan Health Industries, Inc., Draper, UT). The subjects were examined in a lying in a prone position with the feet outside the edge with one test leader stabilizing the subject's lower leg. Before the test, the subjects tried the directions against the test leader's hand. Three maximal isometric contractions, measured in Newton (N) with 15 secs of rest between each contraction, were measured and the best attempt was used for further analysis. Five minutes of rest was used when changing test direction. The single leg stance test (SLS) Balance was measured with the Single-leg stance test (SLS). The test began with the subject standing on one leg, with his arms straight down, and the other leg held against the calf of the standing leg. When standing steadily, the subject was asked to close their eyes and maintain balance without using opposite legs or arms. The number of times the subject corrected his balance, during 30 sec, was documented as part foot lifts. Part foot lift was defined as all parts of the foot that left the surface, e.g. toes, outside foot, heel. Putting down the opposite leg also counted as part foot lift. The total number of part foot lifts constituted a score that was used as a result. Functional performance Functional performance was assessed by the Single-leg hop for distance (SLHD) and the 30-sec timed side hop test. Before each test, the subject had to perform three submaximal test jumps. For the SLHD, the subject was standing on one leg with the other leg lifted from the floor. Free leg swing was allowed but the hands was placed behind the back. The subject jumped forward as far as possible, taking off and landing on same foot with a controlled landing. The subject had to maintain balance on landing until the test leader had registered the landing position, approximately (2-3 s). The distance was measured in centimeters from the toe at the push-off to the heel where the subject landed. For the side hop test, the subject stood on the test leg, with the other leg lifted from the floor, and hands placed behind the back. Two parallel strips of tape, placed 40 cm apart on the floor was used and the subject jumped from side to side as many times as possible during a period of 30 s. The number of successful jumps performed, without touching the tape, was recorded and will be used for further analysis. Sample size calculation Based on a power of 0.80 (α =0.05), approximately 18 CAI subjects would be required to detect a 20 % difference between injured and non-injured ankle in the balance test score. Twenty percent was considered as a minimal clinically relevant difference. Therefore, this study was planned to recruit a minimum of 25 CAI subjects with regard for potential dropouts. Statistical analysis plan Statistics will be calculated using IBM SPSS (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 27.0. IBM, Armonk, NY). Differences in strength, balance and functional performance, between injured and non-injured ankle, will be analyzed with the Wilcoxon rank test. The Spearman's correlation coefficient will be used to analyze the association between the different tests. The limb symmetry index (LSI) will be calculated to determine whether a side-to-side lower limb difference could be classified as normal or abnormal. The LSI is defined as the ratio of the score of the injured ankle and the score of the non-injured ankle, expressed in percent (injured/non-injured x 100 = LSI).


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 35
Est. completion date December 8, 2022
Est. primary completion date December 8, 2022
Accepts healthy volunteers
Gender All
Age group 15 Years to 40 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Unilateral ankle problems - Aged 15-40 years - Minimum three recurrent sprains in the past year Exclusion Criteria: - previous ankle fracture with internal fixation surgery - disease / illness that could have a general effect on the balance or strength - newly sprained/injured in the current ankle within a period of eight weeks before the test

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Diagnostic Test:
A test battery for evaluation of muscle strength, balance and functional performance
Subjects with chronic ankle instability (CAI) were evaluated with five tests of strength, balance and functional performance.

Locations

Country Name City State
Sweden Sofia Ryman Augustsson Kalmar

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Linnaeus University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Sweden, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Muscle strength measured in Newton Ankle inversion and eversion isometric muscle strength measured with a handheld dynometer and measured in Newton 1 day
Primary Balance Balance assessed by the Single-leg stance test (SLS) and measured in number of footlifts 1 day
Primary Functional performance assessed with the SLHD test measured in centimeters Functional performance assessed with the SLHD test measured in centimeters for the total distance. The athlete stands on one leg and then jump as far as possible and land on the same leg. The best of three attempts will be used for further analysis. 1 day
Primary Functional performance assessed with the side hop test and measured as the number of repetitions Functional performance assessed with the side hop test and measured as the number of repetitions. Two parallel strips of tape is placed 40 cm apart on the floor. The athlete stands on one leg, with the hands behind the back, and jumps from side to side between the two strips. The athlete jumps as many times as possible during a period of 30 s. The number of successful jumps performed, without touching the tape, is recorded. 1 day
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT06228378 - Comparative Spectroscopic Analysis of Synovial Fluid From the Stable and Unstable Ankle N/A
Terminated NCT03818438 - Chronic Ankle Instability Diagnostic Tests Determining Underlying Deficits
Recruiting NCT02955485 - A Prediction Model for Chronic Ankle Instability
Completed NCT05585385 - Effect of Backward Walking Versus Balance Training in Chronic Ankle Instability Patients N/A
Recruiting NCT06118879 - Role of Sensory Deficits on Sensorimotor Control in Athletes With Chronic Ankle Instability N/A
Completed NCT06020131 - Effect Of Thoracic Mobility Versus Lumbopelvic Stabilization Exercises On Patients With Chronic Ankle Instability N/A
Recruiting NCT04322409 - NMES and Chronic Ankle Instability Phase 1
Completed NCT04083391 - Flexibility Deficit in Chronic Ankle Instability
Withdrawn NCT03706729 - Elite Athletes With Chronic Ankle Instability Using Spraino®: A Cohort Study N/A
Completed NCT04360798 - The Effectiveness of Unilateral and Bilateral Exercise Training in Patients With Lateral Ankle Instability N/A
Completed NCT04064502 - Chronıc Ankle Instabılıty And Assocıated Factors
Active, not recruiting NCT01781351 - Neuromuscular Control of the Ankle With External Support N/A
Completed NCT01733433 - Influence of Taping on Postural Control in Subjects With Chronic Ankle Instability N/A
Completed NCT05455957 - The Effect of Neuromuscular and Vestibulo-Ocular Training on Balance,Isokinetic Strength and Proprioception in Chronic Ankle Instability N/A
Completed NCT04599985 - Effect of Balance Training Protocols on Balance, Proprioception, ROM, and Pain in Athlete With Chronic Ankle Instability N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06269471 - On the ICC's Path: a Prevalence Study
Completed NCT06204861 - The Effect of Capacitive and Resistive Electric Transfer Therapy in Chronic Ankle Instability Patients N/A
Completed NCT05327244 - The Impact of Real-World Vibration Feedback Gait Retraining on Gait Biomechanics in People With Chronic Ankle Instability N/A
Completed NCT03598985 - Smartphone for Assessing Balance in Patients With Ankle Instability
Recruiting NCT05757375 - Mulligan Ankle Taping on Volleyball Players N/A