Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04228835
Other study ID # 1001
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date March 1, 2017
Est. completion date July 31, 2019

Study information

Verified date January 2020
Source University of Malaya
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Achievement of critical view of safety (CVS) is recommended to reduce risk of hilar injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence cholangiography, a novel technique of real time biliary visualization, is postulated to assist dissection during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). However, its use in providing a faster and safer LC has yet to be established. The main objective of this study is to evaluate whether the use of ICG enhanced fluorescence cholangiography will help in earlier identification critical view of safety during LC.


Description:

Indocyanine green (ICG) is excreted exclusively in the biliary system and emits fluorescence light when viewed using near infrared imaging. This enables extrahepatic biliary tree anatomy to be delineated during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Indocyanine green fluorescence cholangiography also enables earlier detection of cystic duct and common bile duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This is reported in two studies which showed that cystic duct can be identified 11 minutes and 8.6 minutes earlier and common bile duct 10 and 11 minutes earlier than white light imaging.

To date, there is no data published on the use of fluorescent cholangiography in reducing operative time of identification of critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, which is an integral part of the surgery. Theoretically achievement of critical view of safety maybe facilitated by fluorescent cholangiography as this technique facilitates identification of biliary structures.

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate whether an earlier identification of CVS can be obtained by using ICG fluorescence cholangiography as an adjunct to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Secondary outcomes assessed are the presence of minor or major complications between this two groups.

Patients are randomly assigned into two arms; ICG fluorescence cholangiography assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ICGFC- LC) and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), using a computer-generated block randomization. Patients in the ICGFC- LC group received intravenous bolus of 2.5mg of ICG before the induction of anaesthesia. All the surgeries are performed using standard four ports technique. Near infrared light camera by Karl Storz Endoscopy is used intermittently during dissection for the ICGFC-LC group.

Time to identification of CVS is defined by time of gallbladder retraction to time of establishment of critical view of safety. Critical view of safety is achieved when all the three criteria set by Strasberg is met. Mean time to identification of CVS in the two groups of patients were then compared. All patients are followed up for one month to identify any post-operative complications.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 72
Est. completion date July 31, 2019
Est. primary completion date July 31, 2019
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Symptomatic cholelithiasis for elective cholecystectomy

- American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) classification of physical status I or II

- Normal kidney function

- Normal liver function

Exclusion Criteria:

- Liver cirrhosis

- Hepatits B or C

- Allergies to iodine or seafood

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Diagnostic Test:
Fluorescence Cholangiography
Administration of ICG for fluorescence cholangiography

Locations

Country Name City State
Malaysia University Malaya Medical Centre Kuala Lumpur Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University of Malaya Ummi Surgical Sdn Bhd

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Malaysia, 

References & Publications (2)

Schols RM, Bouvy ND, van Dam RM, Masclee AA, Dejong CH, Stassen LP. Combined vascular and biliary fluorescence imaging in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2013 Dec;27(12):4511-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3100-7. Epub 2013 Jul 23. — View Citation

van Dam DA, Ankersmit M, van de Ven P, van Rijswijk AS, Tuynman JB, Meijerink WJ. Comparing Near-Infrared Imaging with Indocyanine Green to Conventional Imaging During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Crossover Study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015 Jun;25(6):486-92. doi: 10.1089/lap.2014.0248. Epub 2015 May 14. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Time to identification of critical view of safety Compare time to identification of critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy which is defined as time of gallbladder retraction until establishment of critical view of safety. Time of surgery
Secondary Complications Compare rate of complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy such as bile duct injury, major haemorrhage, intraabdominal collections and surgical site infection up to 30 days post operative
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT00530998 - Minimally Invasive Surgery: Using Natural Orfices
Completed NCT00616616 - Single Incision Laparoscopy N/A
Recruiting NCT00416234 - Laparoendoscopic Rendez Vous Versus Standard Two Stage Approach for the Management of Cholelithiasis/Choledocholithiasis N/A
Recruiting NCT05975385 - Acupuncture for Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy N/A
Recruiting NCT06038201 - Cholecystectomy vs EUS-guided GBD With Stone Removal N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03981315 - Bile Composition in Healthy and Gallstones Patients
Completed NCT01824186 - Trial Comparing Pain in Single-incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy N/A
Completed NCT00606762 - Comparison Between Low Pressure Versus High Pressure Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy N/A
Completed NCT00971750 - Laparoscopic Versus Transabdominal Ultrasound in Morbidly Obese Patients N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04279223 - Does Using a 5 mm Telescope in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Reduce the Incidence of Trocar Site Hernia? N/A
Terminated NCT01708109 - Optimal Handling of Common Bile Duct Calculus, a Prospective Study N/A
Completed NCT01881399 - Fluorescence Versus Intraoperative Cholangiography in the Visualization of Biliary Tree Anatomy N/A
Withdrawn NCT01146184 - Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using a Flexible Endoscope and Ethicon Manually Articulating Devices (MAD) N/A
Terminated NCT00910325 - Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery: Laparoscopic-Assisted Transvaginal Cholecystectomy Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed NCT04672902 - Treatment of Mirizzi Syndrome
Completed NCT03180229 - Granisetron Effect on Hemodynamic Changes in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Phase 4
Completed NCT02375529 - A Trial of Single Incision Versus Four Ports Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT01339325 - Laparo-endoscopic Single Site (LESS) Cholecystectomy Versus Standard LAP-CHOLE Phase 4
Terminated NCT00486655 - NOTES-Assisted Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Surgery N/A
Completed NCT00131131 - Epidemiology of Gallbladder Sludge and Stones in Pregnancy N/A