Cholelithiasis Clinical Trial
Official title:
Transvaginal Natural Orifice Translumenal and Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) Cholecystectomy vs. Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Phase I/II Clinical Trial
Cholecystectomy is one of the most common general surgery procedures performed in the US
today and is among top 10 procedures performed in U.S. hospitals annually, and biliary tract
disease has been estimated to cost U.S. healthcare $5 billion/year. Laparoscopic
cholecystectomy was introduced in the early 1990s and has become the standard surgical
approach for the treatment of gallbladder disease. More than 500,000 cholecystectomy
procedures are performed in the US every year. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is now performed
as an outpatient basis and is related to a very low complication rate. Laparoscopic
cholecystectomy requires the use of multiple trocar incisions.
Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery(NOTES) is a new type of surgical procedure
currently being studied around the world. The idea of NOTES was developed several years ago
in response to the concepts that patients would
1. realize the benefits of less invasive surgery by reducing the recovery time,
2. experience less physical discomfort associated with traditional procedures
3. have virtually no visible scarring following this type of surgery.
All of these advantages have spurred research and investigation forward, encouraging
physicians and researchers to develop new equipment and techniques to use during NOTES
procedures. Although the Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery approach may hold
tremendous potential, there are many issues that need to be addressed before this technique
is introduced into clinical care.
The purpose of this study is to determine the safety, feasibility and short-term clinical
outcomes (Phase I trial) of transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy in female patients with
symptomatic cholelithiasis and compare it to Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (Phase II).
Hypothesis 1: Transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy is safe and feasible in female patients
with symptomatic cholelithiasis.
Hypothesis 2: The short term outcomes of Transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy are comparable
to Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in female patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis.
Aim 1: Determine the safety of Transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy. Aim 2: Determine the
feasibility of Transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy. Aim 3: Determine the short-term outcomes
of Transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy. Aim 4: Compare the short-term outcomes of
Transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy to Laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Most recently, surgeons and endoscopists have focused on NOTES cholecystectomy. Access to the abdominal cavity to perform NOTES procedures has been obtained by transgastric, transvaginal, transvesical and transrectal approaches. The first successful NOTES procedure in humans was an appendectomy in India. Transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy has been successfully performed and reported in a handful of cases in the US, Europe and South America. However, to date, there is lack of clinical trials that demonstrate the safety and feasibility of Transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy in a larger group of patients. ;
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT00616616 -
Single Incision Laparoscopy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00530998 -
Minimally Invasive Surgery: Using Natural Orfices
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT00416234 -
Laparoendoscopic Rendez Vous Versus Standard Two Stage Approach for the Management of Cholelithiasis/Choledocholithiasis
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05975385 -
Acupuncture for Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06038201 -
Cholecystectomy vs EUS-guided GBD With Stone Removal
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03981315 -
Bile Composition in Healthy and Gallstones Patients
|
||
Completed |
NCT01824186 -
Trial Comparing Pain in Single-incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00606762 -
Comparison Between Low Pressure Versus High Pressure Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00971750 -
Laparoscopic Versus Transabdominal Ultrasound in Morbidly Obese Patients
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04279223 -
Does Using a 5 mm Telescope in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Reduce the Incidence of Trocar Site Hernia?
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT01708109 -
Optimal Handling of Common Bile Duct Calculus, a Prospective Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01881399 -
Fluorescence Versus Intraoperative Cholangiography in the Visualization of Biliary Tree Anatomy
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT01146184 -
Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using a Flexible Endoscope and Ethicon Manually Articulating Devices (MAD)
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT00910325 -
Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery: Laparoscopic-Assisted Transvaginal Cholecystectomy
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04672902 -
Treatment of Mirizzi Syndrome
|
||
Completed |
NCT03180229 -
Granisetron Effect on Hemodynamic Changes in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02375529 -
A Trial of Single Incision Versus Four Ports Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT01339325 -
Laparo-endoscopic Single Site (LESS) Cholecystectomy Versus Standard LAP-CHOLE
|
Phase 4 | |
Terminated |
NCT00486655 -
NOTES-Assisted Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Surgery
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00131131 -
Epidemiology of Gallbladder Sludge and Stones in Pregnancy
|
N/A |