View clinical trials related to Choledocholithiasis.
Filter by:This study compare 2 techniques to treat difficult bile duct stones endoscopically
Laboratory change induced by common bile duct (CBD) stone is in general observed as the higher elevation of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and gamma-glutamyl transpeptideas (ɤ-GT), in comparison to those of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT). However, some patients with CBD stone show the marked increased level of aminotransferase, which sometimes leads to misdiagnose those as liver disease caused by viral hepatitis, ischemia, and drug toxicity. The aim of this study is to investigate the clinicopathologic features of patients with CBD stones with the high level of aminotransferase in serum.
Carbon dioxide (CO2) gas is widely used for luminal insufflation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) of the biliary tract. While frequently observed during routine ERCP, there are few data on the topic of "air" or "CO2" cholangiography. Our primary aim is to compare radiographic cholangiograms in patients with biliary tract disease (from stones or strictures) during ERCP obtained by using carbon dioxide as the contrast medium vs. conventional iodinated contrast.
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been widely used in diagnosis and treatment of pancreaticobiliary diseases. Traditionally, ERCP has been performed in the prone position. The prone position for ERCP can facilitate selective bile duct cannulation, offer a better fluoroscopic image of pancreaticobiliary anatomy, and prevent aspiration of gastric contents. However, in cases of difficult in the prone position, ERCP has been performed in the left lateral or supine position. Compared with the prone position, left lateral position is more comfortable for patients, especially with limitation for cervical movement including cervical cord injury, cervical spine operation, parkinson's disease, contracture due to cerebral infarction, and allow more easy passage of the scope through the pharynx, and useful to secure airway. However, in the left lateral position, it is difficult to obtain fluoroscopic image of right hepatic duct and intrahepatic bile duct. In cases of severe abdominal pain, severe abdominal distension, large amount of ascites, recent abdominal surgery or cervical spine surgery, intra-abdominal catheter insertion, severe obesity, it is difficult to position in prone or left lateral, therefore, ERCP may be performed in the supine position. In supine position for ERCP, there has been documented increased risk of cardiopulmonary adverse event and decreased success rate of selective bile duct cannulation. There have been reported the efficacy and safety between the prone position and supine position for ERCP in several studies. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety between the prone position and left lateral position for ERCP in this prospective, randomized study.
Bile duct stone extraction is impossible after endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) alone in approximatively 10% of cases (mostly because of stones' size). Adjunction of a mechanical lithotripsy (ML) is well established to improve clearance of common bile duct (CBD) stones. Because of inconstant success, high cost, and length of procedure, an alternative method was proposed in 2003: endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large balloon dilatation (ESLBD). If the safety of ESLBD is accepted in all recent published studies, it remains controversial wether ESLBD is superior to conventional endoscopic treatment associating ES± ML for CBD stones. Procedure treatment and place of ESLBD in CBD stones therapeutic strategy is unclear. The purpose of this prospective comparative multi center randomized study is to evaluate the superiority or not of ESLBD on conventional treatment (ES±ML) for the treatment of large bile duct stone (≥13mm) after standard ES, and to propose a new CBD stones therapeutic strategy.
Patients with gallstone and confirmed common bile duct stones are registered in this study. The three managements for common bile duct stones are endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST), laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) and laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration (LTCBDE). Patients will be assessed at baseline, preoperative investigations, operative method, operative time, conversion to open procedure, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and the presence of retained and recurrent stones. All patients were followed up for 3 years by telephone interview ang outpatient visits. Abdominal US and liver function tests were carried out whenever any abdominal symptom appeared during the follow-up period. If there were unusual findings, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography(MRCP) was carried out.
Protection of Oddi's sphincter remains a huge argument especially in the long term complications like common bile duct stone recurrence or cholangitis after ERCP, which determined to destroy the sphincter of Oddi. The purpose of this study is to compare the long-term outcomes of ERCP sequential LC versus LCBDE for choledocholithiasis.
Initial cholecystectomy with intraoperative cholangiogram, followed if required by ERCP, has been implemented at the investigators institution as the standard management strategy for patients at intermediate risk of common bile duct stone migration, following a randomized controlled trial previously published by the same investigators team. The aim of this study is to prospectively analyze the outcomes of this strategy.
This study was aimed to to evaluate the efficacy of the new multibending ultra-slim endoscope compared with a conventional ultra-slim endoscope for free-hand insertion of an endoscope into the bile duct for direct POC.
We hypothesise that the use of the LMA-Supreme provides greater ease of insertion and reduced haemodynamic variability during insertion compared to the tracheal tube, whilst still maintaining a patent airway to facilitate elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy in selected patients.