Cholecystitis, Acute Clinical Trial
Official title:
Piperacllin Versus Placebo in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Acute Cholecystitis
The benefit from antibiotic prophylaxis in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis is insufficiently known. The aim of the present double-blind randomized controlled is to compare piperacilin with placebo in patients undergoing cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis with anamnesis not exceeding 5 days. Altogether 100 patients are intended to be included. Primary endpoint is biliary contamination. Secondary endpoints are postoperative hospital stay, health-related quality of life, pain perception, postoperative markers of inflammatory response, surgical site infections, infectious complications other than surgical site infections, health economy and relationship between symptom anamnesis and bile contamination.
Background
Inflammation in the gallbladder due to obstruction of gallstones (acute cholecystitis) is a
common condition and one of the most common indications for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In
most cases, the procedure may be performed without great risk of severe complications. In
some cases, however, the congested bile in the gallbladder may become infected.
In clinical routine, acute cholecystitis is often managed as an infectious condition, despite
the fact that previous studies have shown that the bile in most cases of acute cholecystitis
is sterile. On the other hand, antibiotic prophylaxis may reduce the risk of surgical site
infections in those cases when there is a manifest bacterial contamination and, perhaps, also
reduce the risk of contamination. There is firm evidence supporting acute surgery,
prefereably laparoscopic cholecystectomy, but the benefit from antibiotic treatment has not
been full evaluated.
Previous studies have shown that the benefit from antibiotic prophylaxis is very limited in
case of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for uncomplicated gallstone disease. There are, however,
very few studies that have assessed antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery for acute
cholecystitis.
The aim of the present study is to assess the benefit of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients
undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.
Methods The study is based on patients admitted for acute cholecystitis at the department of
acute surgery, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge. In case the patients fulfill the
inclusion critera and are suitable for laparoscopic surgery, written and oral information
about the study is given.
In case they agree to participate in the study, treatment allocation is determined by a
sealed envelope system. The patients are randomised to receive either Piperacillin 4g x 3 iv
preoperatively as prophylaxis or placebo (saline infusion). The study is double-blind.
Piperacillin/placebo is administrated by a research nurse after allocation. The infusion is
covered by a bag in order to maintain blinding. Neither the surgeon performing the procedure,
nor the patient or staff caring for the patient are informed about the allocation. The
procedure should be performed within 24 days after inclusion. Administration of
Piperacillin/placebo is started immediately after inclusion and continued until the procedure
is completed.
If a categorical indication for antibiotic treatment occurs during surgery, the allocated
infusion is removed and the patient is given antibiotic as decided by the surgeon. In such
cases, the patient stays in the study and is analysed according to an intention to treat.
During the laparoscopic cholecystectomy, at least 10 cc of bile is aspirated under sterile
conditions from the fundus of the gallbladder with a long needle before the start of the
peritoneum dissection. The bile is sent for aerobic and anaerobic culture. Bacteria are
identified using standard laboratory procedures.
Sample size estimation If the incidence of positive cultures is 50% and in the placebo group
and this is reduced to 25% if antibiotic prophylaxis is given, 36 patients in each arm would
be required in order to reach 80% chance of detecting this difference at a p<0.05 level of
significance (one sided test). A total sample of 100 patients should thus be sufficient to
test the primary outcome measure.
Follow-up Samples for CRP, interleukins, bilirubin, AST, ALT and ALP are taken daily from the
peroperative day until postoperative day 2.
Quality of life is assessed by SF-36 preoperatively. Level of pain is estimated based on the
MacGill Pain Questionnaire from the day of the procedure until postoperative day 2.
One month postoperatively, the patient is invited to follow-up. At follow-up, SF-36 is filled
in.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03767881 -
AXIOS™ for Gallbladder Drainage as an Alternative to Percutaneous Drainage IDE
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05975385 -
Acupuncture for Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03470220 -
The Role of Ultrasound in Cholecystitis
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT02972944 -
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy or Conservative Treatment in the Acute Cholecystitis of Elderly Patients
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05702775 -
Endosonography-guided Gallbladder Drainage vs Non-endoscopic Treatment in Inoperable Acute Cholecystitis
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04542512 -
Risk Factors for Necrotic Cholecystitis During COVID-19 Pandemic.
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04103762 -
Interest of Intravenous Cholangiography With Indocyanine Green in the Context of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Grade 1 and 2 Acute Gallstone Cholecystitis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03014817 -
Ultrasonically Activated Scalpel Versus Electrocautery Based Dissection in Acute Cholecystitis Trial
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04612413 -
A Phase 2 Study Evaluating Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Different Doses and Regimens of Allocetra-OTS for the Treatment of Organ Failure in Adult Sepsis Patients
|
Phase 2 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT04167072 -
Observation vs Early Removal of LAMS in EUS Guided Cholecystoenterostomy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04874103 -
Hong Kong Follow up Protocol After EUS Gallbladder Drainage for Acute Cholecistitis
|
||
Completed |
NCT05041686 -
Usefulness of the CADISS® System for the Cleavage of Severe Adhesions in Cholecystectomy
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05339282 -
Effectiveness of Empirical Antibiotic Use in Mild to Moderate Acute Inflammatory Gallbladder Disease
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06330688 -
Prospective Evaluation of Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Cholecystostomy With the Trocar Technique
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04661371 -
Necessity of Preoperative Empirical Antibiotic Use in Acute Cholecystitis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03050242 -
Benefits of Glycopyrrolate on Intubation With Rigid-videostylet (OptiScope®)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06178848 -
EEG Parameters Between Remimazolam- and Propofol-based Anesthesia
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02394327 -
Endoscopic Nasogallbladder Drainage Versus Gallbladder Stenting Before Cholecystecomy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05179629 -
M-Tapa Block for Laparoscopic Cholesistectomy
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03021447 -
Prediction of Postoperative Pain by Injection Pain of Propofol
|
N/A |