Supporting Patient Decisions About UE Surgery in Cervical SCI

Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Clinical Trial

Official title:

Supporting Patient Decisions About Upper Extremity Surgery in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury (Aim 2)

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03464409
• Other study ID #: 201706092
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: March 13, 2018
• Est. completion date: August 30, 2021

Study information

• Verified date: November 2021
• Source: Washington University School of Medicine
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The goal of this study is to collect and describe patient and caregiver reported outcomes regarding surgical and non-surgical treatment for improving hand and arm function in the setting of cervical spinal cord injury. Eligible study participants will be recruited across the 4 sites and the investigators plan to recruit the following groups and numbers of participants: 1. Nerve or tendon transfer recipients: people who have elected to undergo nerve (N=10) or tendon (N=10) transfer surgery to restore some hand and arm function as part of their standard clinical care and their caregiver (N=20) 2. Non-surgical control group: people with cervical SCI (N=20) and their caregiver (N=20)

Description:

At present, there is limited information that provides the exact time course and probability of gain in specific function (such as hand function) that might help patients and clinicians make decisions regarding novel and time-sensitive surgical treatment options. Understanding the pros and cons of any surgical intervention, especially in the setting of complex and often incomplete information, is challenging. Ultimately, this project will create a decision support intervention (DSI) that can be used to help clinicians and people living with cervical level SCI and their caregivers. It will be most useful to those with acute or sub-acute injury (< 1year after SCI) for both military personnel and the general public. Clinicians and patients will have evidence to help them make decisions about treatments to improve upper extremity function. In such a manner, patients can make more well-informed choices that are consistent with their values, needs and goals.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 46
• Est. completion date: August 30, 2021
• Est. primary completion date: August 30, 2021
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 80 Years

Eligibility

CERVICAL SPINAL CORD INJURY PARTICIPANTS

Inclusion criteria:

• Adult subjects (=18 years and < 80 years) with cervical level SCI ASIA A, B or C (minimum 6 months and maximum 20 years post-injury).

Exclusion criteria:

• Patient who chooses simultaneous tendon and nerve transfer procedure (this would preclude separation of the influence of one surgery compared to the other)
• Patient has ASIA D status (these patients may have progressive return of functionally useful motor function below the level of the SCI and would not routinely be offered acute surgical intervention and their experiences are less-relevant to the target patient population). CAREGIVER PARTICIPANTS

Inclusion criteria:

• At least 18 years of age
• Able to answer questions about the primary participant's experiences with cervical spinal cord injury

Exclusion criteria:

• The caregiver/spouse declines to participate in the study. Note: Caregiver participation is preferred, but not required, for SCI participant enrollment.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Cervical Spinal Cord Injury
• Spinal Cord Injuries

Intervention

Other:
• Semi-structured interview
Semi-structured interviews to be conducted by a study team member.
• Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM-SR)
The Spinal Cord Independence Measure - Self Report (SCIM-SR) is a self-report instrument for assessing functional independence of persons with spinal cord injury.
• SF-36
A health-related quality of life (QoL) self-reported survey.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System	Palo Alto	California
United States	Veterans Affairs St. Louis Health Care System	Saint Louis	Missouri
United States	Washington University School of Medicine	Saint Louis	Missouri
United States	Stanford University	Stanford	California

Sponsors (5)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Washington University School of Medicine	Stanford University, United States Department of Defense, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, VA St. Louis Health Care System

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (14)

Anderson KD, Fridén J, Lieber RL. Acceptable benefits and risks associated with surgically improving arm function in individuals living with cervical spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2009 Apr;47(4):334-8. doi: 10.1038/sc.2008.148. Epub 2008 Nov 25. — View Citation

Bertelli JA, Ghizoni MF, Tacca CP. Transfer of the teres minor motor branch for triceps reinnervation in tetraplegia. J Neurosurg. 2011 May;114(5):1457-60. doi: 10.3171/2010.12.JNS101519. Epub 2011 Jan 21. — View Citation

Bertelli JA, Ghizoni MF. Nerve transfers for elbow and finger extension reconstruction in midcervical spinal cord injuries. J Neurosurg. 2015 Jan;122(1):121-7. doi: 10.3171/2014.8.JNS14277. — View Citation

Bertelli JA, Tacca CP, Ghizoni MF, Kechele PR, Santos MA. Transfer of supinator motor branches to the posterior interosseous nerve to reconstruct thumb and finger extension in tetraplegia: case report. J Hand Surg Am. 2010 Oct;35(10):1647-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.07.012. — View Citation

Cain SA, Gohritz A, Fridén J, van Zyl N. Review of Upper Extremity Nerve Transfer in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury. J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj. 2015 Aug 6;10(1):e34-e42. eCollection 2015 Dec. Review. — View Citation

Curtin CM, Gater DR, Chung KC. Upper extremity reconstruction in the tetraplegic population, a national epidemiologic study. J Hand Surg Am. 2005 Jan;30(1):94-9. — View Citation

Curtin CM, Hayward RA, Kim HM, Gater DR, Chung KC. Physician perceptions of upper extremity reconstruction for the person with tetraplegia. J Hand Surg Am. 2005 Jan;30(1):87-93. — View Citation

Fox IK, Davidge KM, Novak CB, Hoben G, Kahn LC, Juknis N, Ruvinskaya R, Mackinnon SE. Nerve Transfers to Restore Upper Extremity Function in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: Update and Preliminary Outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Oct;136(4):780-792. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001641. Review. — View Citation

Fox IK, Davidge KM, Novak CB, Hoben G, Kahn LC, Juknis N, Ruvinskaya R, Mackinnon SE. Use of peripheral nerve transfers in tetraplegia: evaluation of feasibility and morbidity. Hand (N Y). 2015 Mar;10(1):60-7. doi: 10.1007/s11552-014-9677-z. — View Citation

Fox PM, Suarez P, Hentz VR, Curtin CM. Access to surgical upper extremity care for people with tetraplegia: an international perspective. Spinal Cord. 2015 Apr;53(4):302-5. doi: 10.1038/sc.2015.3. Epub 2015 Feb 17. — View Citation

Fridén J, Gohritz A. Brachialis-to-extensor carpi radialis longus selective nerve transfer to restore wrist extension in tetraplegia: case report. J Hand Surg Am. 2012 Aug;37(8):1606-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.05.005. Epub 2012 Jun 30. — View Citation

Joseph-Williams N, Newcombe R, Politi M, Durand MA, Sivell S, Stacey D, O'Connor A, Volk RJ, Edwards A, Bennett C, Pignone M, Thomson R, Elwyn G. Toward Minimum Standards for Certifying Patient Decision Aids: A Modified Delphi Consensus Process. Med Decis Making. 2014 Aug;34(6):699-710. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13501721. Epub 2013 Aug 20. — View Citation

Stacey D, Légaré F, Col NF, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Thomson R, Trevena L, Wu JH. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 28;(1):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4. Review. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4:CD001431. — View Citation

Wagner JP, Curtin CM, Gater DR, Chung KC. Perceptions of people with tetraplegia regarding surgery to improve upper-extremity function. J Hand Surg Am. 2007 Apr;32(4):483-90. — View Citation

* Note: There are 14 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Qualitative (interview) Analysis	All interviews will be transcribed verbatim and analyzed using standard qualitative text analysis. Members of the research team will read the transcripts for accuracy and to determine potential topics for coding. The investigators will develop a codebook using inductive and deductive codes. Deductive codes will be directly linked to our research questions. Adding inductive codes, where topics and codes are not pre-determined but are derived directly from the data, will allow the research team to develop a sense of how patients experience the surgical process, and allows for unexpected findings to emerge. Once the codebook is determined, two members of the research team will code the transcripts. Codes will be compared between raters. The investigators will use the codes to infer themes in the data.	24 months
Secondary	Quantitative (survey) Data Analysis	The data analysis will be conducted within each group. To account for correlations among repeated measures from the same patient, the longitudinal data will be analyzed using a mixed model to examine the change in survey outcomes.	24 months

External Links

•   Center for Nerve Injury & Paralysis, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine