Cervical Ripening Clinical Trial
Official title:
Misoprostol Versus Effox (Individually or in Combination) as Cervical Ripening Agent Prior to 1st Trimesteric Surgical Evacuation
Ninety healthy pregnant women candidate for surgical evacuation after confirming 1st trimester pregnancy loss were enrolled in the study. They were randomized in three groups; misoprostol group in which 30 candidates were receive 2 tablets of misoprostol (i.e. 400 ug) 4 hrs prior to surgical evacuation, Effox group in which 30 candidates were received 2 tablets of Effox (i.e 40 mg) 4 hrs prior to surgical evacuation & combination therapy group in which 30 candidates were received 1 tablets of misoprostol 200ug & 1 tablets of Effox 20 mg 4 hrs prior to surgical evacuation. For all participants, the route of administration was the intravaginal route 1ry outcomes included cervical consistency & dilatation immediately before the procedure. 2ry outcomes included total duration of the operation and the occurrence of drug-related side effects
Objective: To compare the efficacy of the individual use of Misoprostol or Effox or their
combination as cervical ripening agents in cases with 1st trimesteric pregnancy loss
candidate for surgical evacuation.
Study Design: A randomized Single-blind comparative study. Setting: The Obstetrics and
Gynecology casuality department of Kasr El Aini hospital (Cairo University - Egypt) in the
period from November 2015 to June 2016.
Methodology: ninety healthy pregnant women candidate for surgical evacuation after
confirming 1st trimester pregnancy loss were enrolled in the study. They were randomized in
three groups; misoprostol group in which 30 candidates were receive 2 tablets of misoprostol
(PGE1) 200ug (i.e. 400 ug) 4 hrs prior to surgical evacuation, Effox group in which 30
candidates were received 2 tablets of Effox (Isosorbide mononitrate) 20 mg (i.e 40 mg) 4 hrs
prior to surgical evacuation & combination therapy group in which 30 candidates were
received 1 tablets of misoprostol 200ug & 1 tablets of Effox 20 mg 4 hrs prior to surgical
evacuation. The study was approved by the Hospital Ethical Committee. Informed consents were
obtained from all participants after explanation of the aim of the study & the potential
adverse effects. The study was not supported by any pharmacological company.
Inclusion criteria included maternal age 18-40 years, 1st trimesteric pregnancy loss with
gestational age 12 weeks or less (diagnosis was confirmed using transvaginal ultrasound
according to the following criteria: Crown-rump length {CRL} of 7 mm or more and no
heartbeat, Mean sac diameter {MSD} of 25 mm or more and no embryo, absence of embryo with
heartbeat 2 wk or more after a scan that showed a gestational sac without a yolk sac and
absence of embryo with heartbeat 11 days or more after a scan that showed a gestational sac
with a yolk sac)* & closed firm cervix. Exclusion criteria included evidence suggesting
spontaneous onset of abortion (vaginal bleeding or and uterine cramps), previous trial to
induce abortion or the use of any cervical ripening agent during the current pregnancy,
presence or suspicion of septic abortion (fever > 38 C, offensive vaginal discharge &
leukocytosis), Uterine anomalies or history of any cervical surgery or manipulation. For all
patients, full history was taken followed by complete physical examination (including
cervical assessment), transvaginal ultrasound (to confirm early pregnancy loss) & routine
preoperative investigation. Patient is then randomized to one of the three groups (using
computer generated random numbers) and accordingly the investigator gave her either 2
tablets of misoprostol 200ug (misoprostol group) or 2 tablets of Effox 20 mg (Effox group)
or 1 tablets of misoprostol 200ug & 1 tablets of Effox 20 mg (Combination therapy group).
For all participants, the route of administration was the intravaginal route (tablets were
places high up in the posterior fornix of the vagina. Only patients were blinded to the
nature of the tablets. 4 hrs later, the patient was admitted to the operating room for
surgical evacuation with the following technique: under general anesthesia & after
assessment of cervical consistency (soft or firm) & dilatation (tested by the number of the
largest Hegar's dilator passed without resistance), ultrasound-guided suction evacuation was
done followed by fine curettage using the appropriate size curette. All participants were
monitored for any changes in vital signs (every hour), occurrence of headache & severe
abdominal cramps since the onset of drug administration till 6 hours postoperative. 1ry
outcomes included cervical consistency & dilatation immediately before the procedure. 2ry
outcomes included total duration of the operation and the occurrence of drug-related side
effects namely high temperature (38 or more) and severe abdominal pain for the misoprostol
or headache and low blood pressure for the Effox.
;
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Masking: Single Blind (Subject), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT04949633 -
Oxytocin vs Prostaglandins for Labor Induction of Women With an Unfavorable Cervix After 24h of Cervical Ripening
|
Phase 3 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT00953641 -
Vaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening Prior to Endometrial Biopsy
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01127581 -
Efficacy & Safety Study Comparing Misoprostol Vaginal Insert (MVI) Versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert (DVI) for Reducing Time to Vaginal Delivery
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00374621 -
Trial of Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction Using Misoprostol With or Without Intravaginal Isosorbide Mononitrate
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02732522 -
Comparison Between Vaginal and Sublingual Misoprostol 50 µg for Cervical Ripening Prior to Induction of Labor
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05864326 -
Heated Saline in Cervical Balloon for Labor Induction, a RCT
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02975167 -
Patient Satisfaction During Outpatient Versus Inpatient Foley Catheter Induction of Labor
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03138252 -
Study of the Effectiveness of Cervical Ripening Balloon With and Without Oxytocin
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT01720394 -
Efficacy of Induction of Labor on Term Using a Double Balloon Catheter Compared to Dinoprostone Vaginal-insert
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00468520 -
Adjuvant Oxytocin for Preinduction Ripening With a Foley catheter--a Clinical Trial
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02762942 -
Comparison of Vaginal Misoprostol Plus Supracervical Balloon Versus Vaginal Misoprostol Alone for Induction of Labor
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01283022 -
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Study of the 200 Microgram (mcg) Misoprostol Vaginal Insert (MVI 200) in Women at Term Gestation (The MVI-PK Study)
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00886860 -
The Comparison of Efficacy for Cervical Ripening in Labor Induction Between Titrated and Conventional Oral Misoprostol
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT01156948 -
Misoprostol For Nulliparous Women Before Hysteroscopy
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00504465 -
Combined Agent Randomized Trial of Induction of Labor
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01428037 -
Safety and Efficacy Study of Vaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
|
Phase 3 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT00815542 -
Induction of Labor in Oligohydramnios
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01170819 -
Double Balloon Catheter Versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert for Cervical Ripening.
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00346840 -
Safety and Efficacy Study of Misoprostol Vaginal Insert for Induction of Labour
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00442663 -
Trial of Foley Catheter With and Without Extra-Amniotic Saline Infusion for Labor Induction
|
N/A |