Cervical Dystonia Clinical Trial
Official title:
Multicentre Open Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Toxin A (500 Units Dysport®) in the Treatment of Heterogeneous Forms of Cervical Dystonia
Verified date | March 2023 |
Source | Ipsen |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The aim is to demonstrate equivalent efficacy and safety in the treatment of the two most frequent forms of cervical dystonia (predominantly rotational torticollis and predominantly laterocollis) with the standard initial dose of 500 units Dysport®. The patients will be assigned to one of the two basic types of cervical dystonia, either predominantly rotational torticollis or predominantly laterocollis on the basis of clinical examination. This will determine which therapy is to be administered, using the clearly defined, structured injection protocols.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 516 |
Est. completion date | April 2008 |
Est. primary completion date | February 2008 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - De novo patients with cervical dystonia - Outpatient - Patients to be of age 18 years or older - Written informed consent to participate in the study Exclusion Criteria: - Pre-treatment of cervical dystonia with botulinum toxin - Pre-treatment with botulinum toxin for any indication other than cervical dystonia within the past 12 months - Pure retro- or antecollis - Neurological or other diseases which may affect head and neck motor function or neuromuscular transmission, e.g. polyneuropathy with pareses, myasthenia, myopathy, motor neurone diseases, Bekhterev's disease |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Austria | Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder | Graz | |
Austria | NÖ LKH Grimmenstein-Hochegg | Grimmenstein | |
Austria | Univ.-Klinik für Neurologie | Innsbruck | |
Austria | Konventhospital der Barmherzigen Brüder | Linz | |
Austria | O.Ö. Landes-Nervenklinik Wagner-Jauregg | Linz | |
Germany | Neurolog. Klinik des RWTH Aachen | Aachen | |
Germany | Praxis für Anästhesiologie | Ahaus | |
Germany | Praxis für Neurologie und Psychiatrie | Apolda | |
Germany | Sächsisches Krankenhaus | Arnsdorf | |
Germany | Praxis für Neurologie | Aschaffenburg | |
Germany | Klinikum für Rehabilitation | Bad Oeynhausen | |
Germany | Praxis für Neurologie | Bad Reichenhall | |
Germany | Krankenhaus Hohe Warte | Bayreuth | |
Germany | Neurologische Rehabilitationsklinik | Beelitz | |
Germany | NRZ Neurologisches Rehabilitationszentrum Leipzig | Bennewitz | |
Germany | Gemeinschaftspraxis für Neurologie | Berlin | |
Germany | Krankenhaus Henningsdorf | Berlin | |
Germany | Neurologisches Facharztzentrum am St.-Gertrauden-KH | Berlin | |
Germany | Praxis für Neurologie | Berlin | |
Germany | Praxis für Neurologie | Berlin | |
Germany | Universitätsklinikum Charité, Campus Benjamin Franklin | Berlin | |
Germany | Universitätsklinikum Charité, Campus Virchow-Klinikum | Berlin | |
Germany | SALUS Fachkrankenhaus Bernburg | Bernburg | |
Germany | Neurologische Klinik GILEAD im Evang. KH Bielefeld EVKB | Bielefeld | |
Germany | Berufsg. Kliniken Bergmannsheil | Bochum | |
Germany | Praxis für Neurologie | Bochum | |
Germany | St.-Josef-Hospital | Bochum | |
Germany | Medizinische Einrichtung Rhein. F.-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn | Bonn | |
Germany | Zentralkrankenhaus Bremen-Ost | Bremen | |
Germany | Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH | Chemnitz | |
Germany | Praxis für Neurologie | Dachau | |
Germany | Bezirksklinikum Mainkofen | Deggendorf | |
Germany | Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus | Dresden | |
Germany | Malteser Krankenhaus St. Anna | Duisburg | |
Germany | University Hospital, Neurology Clinic | Düsseldorf | |
Germany | Landesklinik Eberswalde | Eberswalde | |
Germany | HELIOS Klinikum Erfurt | Erfurt | |
Germany | Uniklinik Erlangen | Erlangen | |
Germany | Alfried-Krupp-Krankenhaus | Essen | |
Germany | Universitätsklinik Essen | Essen | |
Germany | Kreiskrankenhaus Freiberg | Freiberg | |
Germany | Praxis für Neurologie und Psychiatrie | Giessen | |
Germany | Zentrum für Neurologie | Giessen | |
Germany | Praxis für Neurologie | Gießen | |
Germany | Sächsisches Krankenhaus für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Neurolgie | Großschweidnitz | |
Germany | Bezirkskrankenhaus Günzburg | Günzburg | |
Germany | Katholisches Krankenhaus Hagen | Hagen | |
Germany | Klinikum Ambrock | Hagen | |
Germany | Städt. Krankenhaus Martha-Maria | Halle | |
Germany | Gemeinschaftspraxis für Neurologie | Hamburg | |
Germany | Praxis für Neurologie | Hamburg | |
Germany | Neurologische Uniklinik | Hannover | |
Germany | Praxis für Neurologie | Hannover | |
Germany | Universitätskliniken des Saarlandes | Homburg | |
Germany | Gemeinschaftspraxis für Neurologie/Psychiatrie | Ilmenau | |
Germany | Praxis für Neurologie | Itzehoe | |
Germany | Uniklinik Jena | Jena | |
Germany | Westpfalz-Klinikum GmbH | Kaiserslautern | |
Germany | Universitätsklinikum Kiel | Kiel | |
Germany | Kath. Klinikum/Brüderkrankenhaus | Koblenz | |
Germany | Klinikum Koeln-Merheim | Koeln | |
Germany | Neurologische Praxis | Landshut | |
Germany | Gemeinschaftspraxis für Neurologie | Leipzig | |
Germany | Gemeinschaftspraxis für Neurologie/Psychiatrie | Leipzig | |
Germany | Universitätsklinikum Leipzig | Leipzig | |
Germany | Klinikum Lippe-Lemgo GmbH | Lemgo | |
Germany | Universitätsklinikum | Lübeck | |
Germany | Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen | Ludwigshafen | |
Germany | Gemeinschaftspraxis für Neurologie/Psychiatrie | Lüneburg | |
Germany | Universitätsklinikum | Magdeburg | |
Germany | Universitätsklinikum | Mainz | |
Germany | Klinikum Mannheim | Mannheim | |
Germany | Praxis für Neurologie | Mannheim | |
Germany | Klinikum Minden | Minden | |
Germany | Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH | Mönchengladbach | |
Germany | Klinikum rechts der Isar | München | |
Germany | Neurologisches Krankenhaus München | München | |
Germany | Universitätsklinikum Münster | Münster | |
Germany | Praxis für Neurologie und Nervenheilkunde | Neubrandenburg | |
Germany | Klinikum Nürnberg-Süd | Nürnberg | |
Germany | Evangelisches Krankenhaus Oldenburg | Oldenburg | |
Germany | Praxis für Neurologie und Psychiatrie | Ostfildern | |
Germany | St. Vincenz-Krankenhaus GmbH | Paderborn | |
Germany | Klinikum Ernst von Bergmann | Potsdam | |
Germany | St.-Josefs-Krankenhaus | Potsdam | |
Germany | Zentrum für Psychiatrie Weissenau | Ravensburg | |
Germany | Knappschafts-Krankenhaus | Recklinghausen | |
Germany | Universitätsklinikum | Rostock | |
Germany | Evang.-Freichkirchl. Krankenhaus | Rüdersdorf | |
Germany | Praxis für Neurologie | Schorndorf | |
Germany | Klinikum Uckermark GmbH | Schwedt/Oder | |
Germany | HELIOS Kliniken Schwerin | Schwerin | |
Germany | Asklepios Kliniken Schildautal | Seesen | |
Germany | EMSA | Singen | |
Germany | Landesfachkrankenhaus für Psychatrie und Neurologie | Stadtroda | |
Germany | Praxis für Neurologie | Stralsund | |
Germany | Neurologische Praxis | Straubing | |
Germany | Landesklinik Teupitz | Teupitz | |
Germany | Zentrum für Neurologie und Hertie-Institut für Klinische Hirnforschung | Tübingen | |
Germany | Klinikum Weiden | Weiden | |
Germany | Stiftung Deutsche Klinik für Diagnostik | Wiesbaden | |
Germany | Gemeinschaftspraxis für Neurologie | Wolfenbüttel | |
Germany | Klinikum Wuppertal | Wuppertal | |
Germany | Medizinisches Studienzentrum | Würzburg | |
Germany | Universitätsklinikum Würzburg | Würzburg | |
Germany | Paracelsus Klinik | Zwickau |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Ipsen |
Austria, Germany,
Hefter H, Benecke R, Erbguth F, Jost W, Reichel G, Wissel J. An open-label cohort study of the improvement of quality of life and pain in de novo cervical dystonia patients after injections with 500 U botulinum toxin A (Dysport). BMJ Open. 2013 Apr 18;3(4 — View Citation
Hefter H, Kupsch A, Mungersdorf M, Paus S, Stenner A, Jost W; Dysport Cervical Dystonia Study Group. A botulinum toxin A treatment algorithm for de novo management of torticollis and laterocollis. BMJ Open. 2011 Jan 1;1(2):e000196. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-20 — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Change From Baseline in the Total Score of the Tsui Rating Scale (Patient in Sitting Position) at the First On-treatment Visit (Week 4 or Week 12) | The Tsui rating scale measures severity and duration of head deviation, shoulder elevation and head tremor. This instrument is based on 4 subscores:
Subscore A: amplitude of rotation, deflection (tilt) and ante- / retrocollis (range: 0-9 points) Subscore B: duration of movement (values 1 or 2) Subscore C: severity and duration of shoulder elevation (range: 0-3 points) Subscore D: severity and duration of tremor (range: 0-4 points). The total score was calculated as follows: total score = subscores (A x B) + C + D. The total score ranges between 0 and 25 points. A high total score represents severe CD. The mean change in the total score of the Tsui rating scale (patient in the sitting position) between baseline (Week 0 visit) and the first on-treatment visit (Week 4 or Week 12 visit) is presented. |
Baseline to Week 4 or Week 12 (up to 12 weeks) | |
Secondary | Change in the Total Score of the Tsui Rating Scale (Patient in Sitting Position) Between Visit 1 (Week 0) and Visit 3 (Week 12) | The Tsui rating scale measures severity and duration of head deviation, shoulder elevation and head tremor. This instrument is based on 4 subscores:
Subscore A: amplitude of rotation, deflection (tilt) and ante- / retrocollis (range: 0-9 points) Subscore B: duration of movement (values 1 or 2) Subscore C: severity and duration of shoulder elevation (range: 0-3 points) Subscore D: severity and duration of tremor (range: 0-4 points). The total score was calculated as follows: total score = subscores (A x B) + C + D. The total score ranges between 0 and 25 points. A high total score represents severe CD. The mean change in the total score of the Tsui rating scale (patient in the sitting position) between baseline (Week 0 visit) and the Week 12 visit is presented. |
Baseline to Week 12 | |
Secondary | Change in the Total Score of the Tsui Rating Scale (Patient Walking) Between Baseline (Week 0) and Visit 2 (Week 4) and Visit 3 (Week 12) | The Tsui rating scale measures severity and duration of head deviation, shoulder elevation and head tremor. This instrument is based on 4 subscores:
Subscore A: amplitude of rotation, deflection (tilt) and ante- / retrocollis (range: 0-9 points) Subscore B: duration of movement (values 1 or 2) Subscore C: severity and duration of shoulder elevation (range: 0-3 points) Subscore D: severity and duration of tremor (range: 0-4 points). The total score was calculated as follows: total score = subscores (A x B) + C + D. The total score ranges between 0 and 25 points. A high total score represents severe CD. The mean changes in the total score of the Tsui rating scale (patient walking) between baseline (Week 0 visit) and the Week 4 and Week 12 visits are presented. |
Baseline to Week 4 and Week 12 | |
Secondary | Change in the 4 Subscores of the Tsui Rating Scale (Patient in the Sitting Position) Between Visit 1 (Week 0) and Visit 2 (Week 4) and Visit 3 (Week 12) | The Tsui rating scale measures severity and duration of head deviation, shoulder elevation and head tremor. This instrument is based on 4 subscores:
Subscore A: amplitude of rotation, deflection (tilt) and ante- / retrocollis (range: 0-9 points) Subscore B: duration of movement (values 1 or 2) Subscore C: severity and duration of shoulder elevation (range: 0-3 points) Subscore D: severity and duration of tremor (range: 0-4 points). A higher score for each subscale represents severe CD symptoms. The total score was calculated as follows: total score = subscores (A x B) + C + D. The total score ranges between 0 and 25 points. A high total score represents severe CD. The mean changes in the subscores A to D of the Tsui rating scale (patient in the sitting position) between baseline (Week 0 visit) and the Week 4 and Week 12 visits are presented. |
Baseline to Week 4 and Week 12 | |
Secondary | Change in the Craniocervical Dystonia Questionnaire (CDQ-24) Total Score and Subscores Between Visit 1 (Week 0) and Visit 2 (Week 4) and Visit 3 (Week 12) | The CDQ-24 is a disease-specific quality of life (QoL) instrument and was assessed at Visits 1 to 3. It consists of 24 items investigating problems in daily living skills related to CD.
This instrument is based on 5 subscales: Stigma, Emotional well-being, Pain, Activities of daily living (ADL), Social/family life to which a number of the 24 items are assigned. There are five possible answers to each item representing increasing severity of impairment (scores 0 to 4). The total scores ranged from 0 to 96 (best to worst QoL). In order to obtain scores of the individual subscales, the total score of each subscale (sum of the individual item scores) was transformed linearly to a 0 to 100 scale (best to worst QoL). The mean changes in the CDQ-24 total score between baseline (Week 0 visit) and the Week 4 and Week 12 visits are presented. |
Baseline to Week 4 and Week 12 | |
Secondary | Changes in the Items of the Patient Diary Based on Day-to-day Function and Activities, Pain and Duration of Pain Between Visit 1 (Week 0) and Visit 2 (Week 4) and Visit 3 (Week 12) | The weekly recorded patient diary consists of the three items: Day-to-Day Capacities and Activities, Pain and Duration of Pain. Each item was rated by the patient on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 = no problems at all to 10 = most severe problems (the actual wording is adapted to each item in question).
The mean changes between the baseline (Week 0 visit) and the Week 4 and Week 12 visits are presented. |
Baseline to Week 4 and Week 12 | |
Secondary | Categorical Changes in the Items of the Patient Diary Based on Day-to-day Function and Activities, Pain and Duration of Pain Between Visit 1 (Week 0) and Visit 2 (Week 4) and Visit 3 (Week 12) | The weekly recorded patient diary consists of the three items: Day-to-Day Capacities and Activities, Pain and Duration of Pain. Each item was rated by the patient on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 = no problems at all to 10 = most severe problems (the actual wording is adapted to each item in question).
The following categorical changes between the baseline (Week 0 visit) and the Week 4 and Week 12 visits are presented: Improvement, No change and Deterioration. |
Baseline to Week 4 and Week 12 | |
Secondary | Number of Patients Without Pain and/or With a Reduction in Pain Based on a Global Assessment of Pain by the Investigator and by the Patient at Visit 2 (Week 4) and Visit 3 (Week 12) | Global pain was assessed at Visit 2 (Week 4) and Visit 3 (Week 12); investigators and patients assessed change in global pain according to the following response categories:
= no pain (anymore) = less pain = no change = more pain The numbers of patients falling under each of these categories as assessed by the investigator and patient at Weeks 4 and 12 are presented. |
Week 4 visit and Week 12 visit | |
Secondary | Global Assessment of Efficacy by the Investigator and by the Patient at Visit 2 (Week 4) and Visit 3 (Week 12) | At Visit 2 (Week 4) and Visit 3 (Week 12) investigators and patients assessed global efficacy of injection of 500 U Dysport® according to the following response categories:
= very good = good = moderate = insufficient The numbers of patients falling under each of these categories as assessed by the investigator and patient at Weeks 4 and 12 are presented. |
Week 4 and Week 12 |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03617367 -
Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Repeat Treatments of DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection in Adults With Isolated Cervical Dystonia (ASPEN-OLS)
|
Phase 3 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04057911 -
A Trial of Non-invasive Stimulation in Cervical Dystonia
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT02180139 -
tDCS in Cervical Dystonia
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00541905 -
Daily Dystonia Practice - A Trial to Investigate NT 201, the Duration of Treatment Effect After One Injection Session and in Long-term Treatment in Cervical Dystonia
|
Phase 4 | |
Unknown status |
NCT00418925 -
Efficacy of Dronabinol for the Treatment of Cervical Dystonia
|
Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05715138 -
Comparison of Pallidal With Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Cervical Dystonia
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02959645 -
Assessment of Brain Activities in Cervical Dystonia
|
||
Completed |
NCT02131467 -
Safety and Tolerability of Perampanel in Cervical Dystonia
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03805152 -
Abobotulinum Toxin and Neubotulinum Toxin Injection in Cerivical Dystonia
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT04949594 -
Relief of Pain in Patients With Cervical Dystonia Through the Use of Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation (TENS)
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT01664013 -
The Impact of Botulinum Toxin Treatment in Quality of Life of Cervical Dystonia Patients
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00210431 -
Post Marketing Surveillance Study of Dysport
|
||
Completed |
NCT05157100 -
Clinical Study of Ingrezza (Valbenazine) for the Treatment of Cervical Dystonia
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00257660 -
Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study of AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®) for the Treatment of Cervical Dystonia
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT05103202 -
Efficacy and Safety of 10-Week or Shorter vs 12-Week or Longer Injection Intervals of Botulinum Toxin
|
||
Terminated |
NCT00760318 -
Keppra for Cervical Dystonia
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00323765 -
Plasticity in Cervical Dystonia
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04171258 -
Clinical Trial to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Botulax® Versus Botox® in Patients With Cervical Dystonia
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT04849988 -
A Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of ABP-450 in the Treatment of Cervical Dystonia
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03471923 -
Non-Motor Features of Cervical Dystonia (CD)
|