Cervical Adenocarcinoma Clinical Trial
Official title:
Utility of Preoperative FDG-PET/CT Scanning Prior to Primary Chemoradiation Therapy to Detect Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With Locoregionally Advanced Carcinoma of the Cervix (IB2, IIA ≥ 4 CM, IIB-IVA) or Endometrium (Grade 3 Endometrioid Endometrial Carcinoma; Serous Papillary Carcinoma, Clear Cell Carcinoma, or Carcinosarcoma (Any Grade); and Grade 1 OR 2 Endometrioid Endometrial Carcinoma With Cervical Stromal Involvement Overt in Clinical Examination or Confirmed by Endocervical Curettage
Verified date | November 2018 |
Source | National Cancer Institute (NCI) |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This phase I/II trial is studying how well fludeoxyglucose F 18 PET scan, CT scan, and ferumoxtran-10 MRI scan finds lymph node metastasis before undergoing chemotherapy and radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer or high-risk endometrial cancer. Diagnostic procedures, such as a fludeoxyglucose F 18 positron emission tomography (PET) scan, computed tomography (CT) scan, and ferumoxtran-10 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan, may help find lymph node metastasis in patients with cervical cancer or endometrial cancer.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 384 |
Est. completion date | July 16, 2016 |
Est. primary completion date | September 2014 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Female |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of 1 of the following: - Invasive carcinoma of the cervix meeting all of the following criteria: - Previously untreated, primary disease - Locoregionally advanced (stage IB2, IIA [>= 4 cm], or IIB-IVA) disease - Any cell type allowed - High-risk endometrial carcinoma meeting 1 of the following criteria: - Grade 3 endometrioid or non-endometrioid endometrial carcinoma (clear cell or serous papillary) or carcinosarcoma diagnosed from an endometrial biopsy or dilation and curettage or - Grade 1 or 2 endometrioid endometrial carcinoma with cervical stromal involvement overt on clinical examination or confirmed by endocervical curettage - Under consideration for chemoradiotherapy (patients with cervical cancer) - Undergone appropriate surgery for cervical or endometrial carcinoma with appropriate tissue available for histologic evaluation to confirm diagnosis and stage - Appropriate surgical candidate to undergo extraperitoneal or laparoscopic lymph node sampling OR hysterectomy and lymph node sampling - No surgery for patients with advanced lymphadenopathy - No recurrent invasive carcinoma of the uterus or uterine cervix regardless of previous treatment - No known metastases to the lungs or scalene lymph nodes - No metastases to other organs outside of the pelvis or abdominal lymph nodes at the time of the original clinical diagnosis - Patients with endometrial cancer with known intraperitoneal disease are eligible provided they undergo pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy per protocol - Participants must be enrolled at an American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN)-affiliated institution that is accredited by Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) - GOG performance status 0-2 - Creatinine within normal institutional limits OR, in participants with creatinine levels above institutional normal, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) must be > 60 mL/min; there is no lower limit of normal for serum creatinine for this protocol - Ferritin levels =< 600 ng/mL OR saturation of transferrin level =< 50% - Patients with high levels of ferritin or transferrin are eligible if documented hematology rules out iron overload - Not pregnant or nursing - Negative pregnancy test - No patients weighing greater than that allowable by the PET/CT scanner - No renal abnormalities, such as a pelvic kidney, horseshoe kidney, or renal transplantation, that would require modification of the lymphadenectomy - No history of anaphylactic or life-threatening allergic reactions to any contrast media - No other invasive malignancies within the past 5 years with the exception of nonmelanoma skin cancer - No contraindication to MRI (e.g., severe claustrophobia, pacemaker, aneurysm clips, defibrillators, or other institutional contraindication to MRI) - No history of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biological composition to ferumoxtran-10 (e.g., iron preparations, parenteral iron, parenteral dextran, parenteral iron-dextran, or parenteral iron-polysaccharide preparations) - No immunodeficiencies that would predispose patient to specific or nonspecific mediator release - No history of cirrhosis - No poorly controlled, insulin-dependent diabetes (i.e., fasting blood glucose level > 200 mg/dL) - No prior pelvic or abdominal lymphadenectomy - No prior pelvic radiotherapy - No prior anticancer therapy that would contraindicate study participation - No ferumoxides within the past 2 weeks - No investigational agents within the past 30 days - No other concurrent investigational agents |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Canada | CHUQ - Pavilion Hotel-Dieu de Quebec | Quebec City | Quebec |
Japan | Kagoshima City Hospital | Kagoshima City, Kagoshima | |
Japan | Saitama Medical University International Medical Center | Saitama | |
Japan | Hokkaido University Hospital | Sapporo | Hokkaido |
Korea, Republic of | Keimyung University-Dongsan Medical Center | Jung-Ku | Daegu |
Korea, Republic of | Asan Medical Center | Seoul | |
Korea, Republic of | Gangnam Severance Hospital | Seoul | |
Korea, Republic of | Korea Cancer Center Hospital | Seoul | |
Korea, Republic of | Seoul National University Hospital | Seoul | |
United States | Georgia Regents University Medical Center | Augusta | Georgia |
United States | Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center | Boston | Massachusetts |
United States | Island Gynecologic Oncology | Brightwaters | New York |
United States | Montefiore Medical Center-Einstein Campus | Bronx | New York |
United States | Carolinas Medical Center | Charlotte | North Carolina |
United States | University of Cincinnati | Cincinnati | Ohio |
United States | Case Western Reserve University | Cleveland | Ohio |
United States | Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute | Detroit | Michigan |
United States | Brooke Army Medical Center | Fort Sam Houston | Texas |
United States | Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center | Los Angeles | California |
United States | University of California at Los Angeles Health System | Los Angeles | California |
United States | Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center | Nashville | Tennessee |
United States | The Hospital of Central Connecticut | New Britain | Connecticut |
United States | Mount Sinai Medical Center | New York | New York |
United States | Weill Medical College of Cornell University | New York | New York |
United States | UMDNJ - New Jersey Medical School | Newark | New Jersey |
United States | University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma |
United States | Fox Chase Cancer Center | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania |
United States | Providence Cancer Center -The Plaza | Portland | Oregon |
United States | Providence Portland Medical Center | Portland | Oregon |
United States | Women and Infants Hospital | Providence | Rhode Island |
United States | Mayo Clinic | Rochester | Minnesota |
United States | Sarasota Memorial Hospital | Sarasota | Florida |
United States | Olive View-University of California Los Angeles Medical Center | Sylmar | California |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
National Cancer Institute (NCI) | NRG Oncology |
United States, Canada, Japan, Korea, Republic of,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | The Diagnostic Sensitivity of PET/CT for Detection of Lymph Node Metastasis in Abdomen | The sensitivity is defined as the percentage of patients who test with lymph node metastases by pre-operative PET/CT among the patients who have lymph node metastases identified by post-surgery pathology in abdomen. The reported sensitivity is reader average sensitivity by seven experienced PET-CT readers. | Before surgery (FDG-PET-CT) and after surgery (pathology) | |
Primary | The Diagnostic Specificity of PET/CT for Detection of Lymph Node Metastasis in Abdomen | The specificity is defined as the percentage of patients who test without lymph node metastases by pre-operative PET/CT among the patients who do not have lymph node metastases identified by post-surgery pathology in abdomen. The reported specificity is reader average specificity by seven experienced PET-CT readers. | Before surgery (FDG-PET/CT) and after surgery (pathology) | |
Secondary | The Diagnostic Sensitivity of PET/CT for Detection of Lymph Node Metastasis in Pelvis | The sensitivity is defined as the percentage of patients who test with lymph node metastases by pre-operative PET/CT among the patients who have lymph node metastases identified by post-surgery pathology in pelvis. The reported sensitivity is reader-averaged sensitivity. | Before surgery (DCT) and after surgery (pathology) | |
Secondary | The Diagnostic Specificity of PET/CT for Detection of Lymph Node Metastasis in Pelvis | The specificity is defined as the percentage of patients who test without lymph node metastases in pelvis by pre-operative PET/CT among the patients who do not have lymph node metastases in pelvis identified by post-surgery pathology. The reported specificity is reader-averaged specificity. | Before surgery (FDG-PET/CT) and after surgery (pathology) | |
Secondary | The Diagnostic Sensitivity of PET/CT for Detection of Lymph Node Metastasis in Combination of Abdomen and Pelvis | The sensitivity is defined as the percentage of patients who test with lymph node metastases by pre-operative PET/CT among the patients who have lymph node metastases identified by post-surgery pathology in combination of abdomen and pelvis. The reported sensitivity is reader-average sensitivity. | Before surgery (FDG-PET/CT) and after surgery (pathology) | |
Secondary | The Diagnostic Specificity of PET/CT for Detection of Lymph Node Metastasis in Combination of Abdomen and Pelvis | The specificity is defined as the percentage of patients who test without lymph node metastases by pre-operative PET/CT among the patients who do not have lymph node metastases identified by post-surgery pathology in combination of abdomen and pelvis. The reported specificity is reader-averaged specificity. | Before surgery (FDG-PET/CT) and after surgery (pathology) | |
Secondary | Sensitivity for Detection of Lymph Node Metastasis in Abdomen by CT Alone | The sensitivity is defined as the percentage of patients who test with lymph node metastases by pre-operative CT alone among the patients who have lymph node metastases identified by post-surgery pathology in abdomen. The reported estimate of sensitivity is reader-average sensitivity across all 7 experienced PET-CT readers. | Before surgery (FDG-PET/CT) and after surgery (pathology) | |
Secondary | Sensitivity for Detection of Lymph Node Metastasis in Pelvis by CT Alone | The sensitivity is defined as the percentage of patients who test with lymph node metastases by pre-operative either CT alone among the patients who have lymph node metastases identified by post-surgery pathology in pelvis. The reported estimate of sensitivity is reader-average sensitivity across all 7 experienced PET-CT readers. | Before surgery (FDG-PET/CT) and after surgery (pathology) | |
Secondary | Sensitivity Between for Detection of Lymph Node Metastasis in Combination of Abdomen and Pelvis by CT Alone | The sensitivity is defined as the percentage of patients who test with lymph node metastases by pre-operative by CT alone among the patients who have lymph node metastases identified by post-surgery pathology in pelvis. The reported estimate of sensitivity is reader-average sensitivity across all 7 experienced PET-CT readers. | Before surgery (FDG-PET/CT) and after surgery (pathology) | |
Secondary | Specificity for Detection of Lymph Node Metastasis in Abdomen by CT Alone | The specificity is defined as the percentage of patients who test without lymph node metastases by pre-operative CT alone among the patients who do not have lymph node metastases identified by post-surgery pathology in pelvis. The reported estimate of specificity is reader-average specificity across all 7 experienced PET-CT readers. | Before surgery (FDG-PET/CT) and after surgery (pathology) | |
Secondary | Specificity Between for Detection of Lymph Node Metastasis in Pelvis by CT Alone | The specificity is defined as the percentage of patients who test without lymph node metastases by pre-operative byCT alone among the patients who do not have lymph node metastases identified by post-surgery pathology in pelvis. The reported estimate of specificity is reader-average specificity across all 7 experienced PET-CT readers. | Before surgery (FDG-PET/CT) and after surgery (pathology) | |
Secondary | Specificity for Detection of Lymph Node Metastasis in Combination of Abdomen and Pelvis by CT Alone | The specificity is defined as the percentage of patients who test without lymph node metastases by pre-operative CT alone among the patients who do not have lymph node metastases identified by post-surgery pathology in pelvis. The reported estimate of specificity is reader-average specificity across all 7 experienced PET-CT readers. | Before surgery (FDG-PET/CT) and after surgery (pathology) | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants in Whom PET/CT Detects Biopsy-proven Disease Outside the Abdominal Lymph Nodes | Before surgery (FDG-PET/CT) and after surgery (pathology) | ||
Secondary | Percentage of Participants in Whom PET/CT Detects Biopsy-proven Disease Outside the Pelvic Lymph Node | Before surgery (FDG-PET/CT) and after surgery (pathology) | ||
Secondary | Cervical Cancer Patients With Adverse Events (Grade 3 or Higher) at Least Possibly Attributed to Extra-peritoneal or Laparoscopic Abdominal and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy | Number of participants with cervical cancer and a maximum grade of 3 or higher during treatment period. Adverse events are graded and categorized using CTCAE v3.0. | During surgery and up to 30 days after surgery. | |
Secondary | Cause of Delay in the Initiation of Chemo-radiation Therapy More Than 4 Weeks After PET/CT for Cervical Cancer Patients | Number of cervical cancer patients with reasons of delay in the initiation of chemo-radiation therapy | Within 4 weeks from PET/CT | |
Secondary | Cause of Interruption in Radiation Therapy in Cervical Cancer Patients | Number of cervical cancer patients with reasons of interruption in radiation therapy | Within 6 weeks after surgery |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT02562729 -
Complete Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00054444 -
Radiation Therapy and Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05210348 -
Clinical Evaluation of Detection of High Risk HPV in Urine
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02140021 -
Biospecimen Collection and Testing for the Prevalence of Anal Dysplasia and Anal Cancer in Patients With Cervical, Vaginal and Vulvar Dysplasia and Cancer
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00068549 -
Radiation Therapy Plus Cisplatin and Gemcitabine in Treating Patients With Cervical Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT01711515 -
Chemoradiation Therapy and Ipilimumab in Treating Patients With Stages IB2-IIB or IIIB-IVA Cervical Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
Terminated |
NCT00924066 -
Ixabepilone to Treat Cervical Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00559377 -
FDG and FMISO PET Hypoxia Evaluation in Cervical Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00309959 -
ABI-007 in Treating Patients With Persistent or Recurrent Cervical Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05613283 -
Primary Cervical Cancer Screening by Self-sampling HPV Test
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03742869 -
HPV Integration and Tumorigenesis of Uterine Cervical Adenocarcinoma
|
||
Withdrawn |
NCT03834571 -
Testing the Addition of Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Given After Standard Chemotherapy and Radiation for Cervical Cancer in HIV-positive Women
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01266460 -
Vaccine Therapy in Treating Patients With Persistent or Recurrent Cervical Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00064077 -
Comparison of Four Combination Chemotherapy Regimens Using Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Stage IVB, Recurrent, or Persistent Cancer of the Cervix
|
Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02257528 -
Nivolumab in Treating Patients With Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02466971 -
Testing the Addition of a New Anti-Cancer Drug, Triapine, to the Usual Chemotherapy Treatment (Cisplatin) During Radiation Therapy for Advanced-stage Cervical and Vaginal Cancers
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02164461 -
Axalimogene Filolisbac (ADXS11-001) High Dose in Women With Human Papillomavirus (HPV) + Cervical Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT01281852 -
Paclitaxel, Cisplatin, and Veliparib in Treating Patients With Advanced, Persistent, or Recurrent Cervical Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04622670 -
Yoga Therapy During Chemotherapy and Radiation Treatment for the Improvement of Physical and Emotional Well-Being in Patients With Stage IB2-IIIB Cervical Cancer
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02921269 -
Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab in Treating Patients With Recurrent, Persistent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
|
Phase 2 |