View clinical trials related to Central Venous Catheter.
Filter by:The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a central venous catheter (CVC) care protocol, which was created using current guidelines, research results, and expert opinions, on developing CVC-related bloodstream infection in patients with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) until discharge.
Oncology and hemotology patients under anticancer treatments are exposed to increased risks of central venous catheter-related complications due to the underlying cancer and its treament. This prospective observational monocentric french study aims at describing the incidence of such complications, their morbimortality, and analyzing some risk factors in order to contribute to propose some strategies to reduce these complications' rate and consequences
Central venous catheters (CVC) are commonly inserted in surgical or critically ill patients. However, CVC placement can cause severe complications. To reduce the incidence of complications and increase procedural safety and quality, ultrasound (US)-guided CVC insertion is recommended by various scientific societies, including the American Society of Anesthesiologists. During conventional US-guided CVC placement, the correct position of the needle tip in the venous vessel is confirmed by direct US visualization and aspiration of blood using a syringe connected to the needle. After blood aspiration, the operator must discontinue US-guidance to disconnect the syringe and the needle and to pass the guidewire through the needle (without direct US visualization). This step bears the risks of dislocating the needle tip and puncturing the posterior wall of the target vein or an adjacent artery. Some authors thus propose an US-guided wire-in-needle technique - in which the guidewire is directly adapted to the needle (without a syringe) from the beginning of the procedure and the guidewire is advanced under direct US visualization. Whether the wire-in-needle technique decreases the procedure time, the number of needle passes, and complications compared to conventional US-guided CVC remains scarcely investigated. We thus propose a randomized controlled trial to investigate whether the US-guided wire-in-needle technique for CVC placement in the internal jugular vein (IJV) is faster and safer than the conventional US-guided technique in patients having cardiac surgery.
A lot of complications occur during central venous catheter insertion in intensive care units all over the world most commonly pneumothorax, misplacement and infection. So in this study we will assess the effect of using ultrasonography guidance for CVC insertion to reduce incidence of complications and to confirm placement compared to standard blind technique.
This is a prospective, multi-center, single-arm study designed to assess the safety and performance of the Pristineā¢ Long-Term Hemodialysis Catheter.
Studies that used a dilute citrate formulation (4%) demonstrated efficacy as an anticoagulant with minimal to no risk of bleeding in HD sessions. This study will compare effectiveness and safety utilizing 4% sodium citrate vs. heparin as a lock solution in central venous hemodialysis catheter among hemodialysis patients.
Patients, ages between 18-70 years, who require central venous catheter will be enrolled for the study. Central venous catheter will be inserted using patient's height formula by Seldinger technique. Anterioposterior chest radiography will be used to assess the correct tip position. Catheters that are below the carina more than 1 cm, will be pulled back for repositioning. Catheters that are above the carina more than 1 cm, will be changed by another catheter. The investigators aim to evaluate the formula for correct tip positioning for central venous catheters
Central venous catheterisation is a medical technique that has become established over many decades and can be rated as State of the Art. However, there is only few clinical evidence for the use of Certofix® Paed and additional clinical data need to be collected to underline the long-term performance and safety in paediatric patients. An updated summary overview of Binninger and Roschke describes the potential incidence rates of the classically catheter-related complications, e.g. catheter malposition, catheter fracture, occlusion, thrombosis and catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) which may have an impact on overall morbidity, mortality and treatment costs. These catheter-related complications should be evaluated in this non-interventional study in paediatric patients.
Research Question: In adult SCD patients with CVC, is it feasible and safe to conduct an adequately powered RCT to evaluate the use of rivaroxaban as thromboprophylaxis in this population? Study Design: The study is a vanguard pilot double blind multi-centre randomized controlled trial. Participants with SCD and CVC will be randomized to either rivaroxaban 10mg PO daily or placebo for the duration of CVC in situ or for up to one year, whichever is less. After screening (day -7 to day -1), patients will be followed at day 1, months 3 (+/- 15 days), 6 (+/- 15 days), 9 (+/- 15 days), and 12 (+/- 15 days). Study Objectives: The primary objective is to estimate the proportion of eligible patients who will enroll into a trial of thromboprophylaxis. Secondary objectives include (a) document indications for central venous catheter (CVC), (b) summarize duration of CVC insertion prior to enrollment, (c) estimate adherence to the study drug, (d) estimate proportions of participants being compliant with study procedures, and lost to follow up. Exploratory objectives will assess thrombotic, bleeding, and quality of life outcomes.
This is a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial designed to compare the antimicrobial efficacy of Tegaderm CHG I.V. Securement Dressing and transparent dressings for deep vein catheterization in adult ICU patients.